Rewriting The Past At The IPCC

In the 1990 IPCC report, they showed little warming since 1900.

ScreenHunter_5444 Dec. 21 20.25

In the 1995 IPCC report, they showed no troposphere warming from 1958 onward.

ScreenHunter_5421 Dec. 21 09.02

Now they show the world heating out of control since the start of the 20th century.


“He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.”

― George Orwell, 1984


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Rewriting The Past At The IPCC

  1. Hey that’s hysterical. They are comparing global temps to the 1961 – 1990 average, but if you look at 1961 to 1990 on the graph, they have error bars going from +.3 to -.5 degrees for an error range of 0.8 degrees. That means they don’t know what the temperatures were then.

    Where is the Medieval Warm Period? Mike the Pilt got rid of that years ago:

  2. Actually, IPCC itself has very, very quietly backed away from the hockey stick. Compare Mann’s version in the 2001 report (which you have posted here) with the corresponding graphs on page 409 (in Chapter 5) of the 2013 report: they show medieval temperatures comparable to those of our time.

    Click to access WG1AR5_Chapter05_FINAL.pdf

  3. emsnews says:

    Except it was warmer back in the good old Medieval Prime Era!

    And there was a population bubble which popped with the Little Ice Age. I am assuming that all those Medieval Knights stopped driving their SUVs and returned to using horses in 1400. 🙂

  4. jdseanjd says:

    Thought you might like this :
    Must have been a lot of CO2 in that dust.

  5. jdseanjd says:

    Try :
    & put in : 1816 the year without a summer
    which does seem to work, for some reason.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Here is your URL:

      Please notetwenty years ago the idiots in Washington DC decided to get rid of the US strategic grain reserves because Goldman Sachs and the Grain traders wanted to make money off starvation….

      Note Amstutz did the writing under Reagan but the WTO and farm bill were not made law until Clinton. It is one of the reasons I am so cynical about there being much difference between DemiRats and ReBooblicans. The elites come up with an idea and if it doesn’t fly under a republican they get it through under a Democrat. The Federal Reserve Act is another classic example. It started out as Republican Senator Aldrich’s baby.

      • mjc says:

        Also don’t forget that what may have started as a somewhat reasonable idea from a Republican, once in the hands of a Demirat ends up morphed and transformed into something that should be staked through the heart, drawn, quartered, shot, beheaded and burned at the stake, with its ashes scattered on the wind…

        • Gail Combs says:

          “Also don’t forget that what may have started as a somewhat reasonable idea from a Republican, once in the hands of a Demirat politician ends up morphed and transformed into something that should be staked through the heart, drawn, quartered, shot, beheaded and burned at the stake, with its ashes scattered on the wind…

          There fixed it for ya.
          The actual problem:
          Law degrees are held by 169 Members of the House (38% of the House) and 57
          Senators (57% of the Senate) and 20 Representatives (but no Senators) have doctoral (Ph.D. or D.Phil.) degrees – Membership of the 113th Congress: A Profile

          Close to half or more of our representatives have no real everyday experience in creating REAL WEALTH; Farming, Construction, Mining, Industry, the activities that actually generate the wealth that makes our civilization viable so they have ZERO respect for that wealth creation or the people who do it.

          I am talking about get yourself sweaty activities. Not the Mitt Romney Corporate Raider ‘wealth stripping’ activities using ‘Leveraged buyouts’ (aka Banker fairy dust) to convert solid mid-level no debt companies into cash cows for the raiders and bankers that were so prominent under Reagan. I worked for a really good debt free company that was killed off by a corporate raider, dismantled, sold off and shipped overseas leaving hundreds of Americans with no jobs. NONE of the companies I or my husband worked for are left.

          Of mergers and acquisitions each costing $1 million or more, there were just 10 in 1970; in 1980, there were 94; in 1986, there were 346. A third of such deals in the 1980’s were hostile. The 1980’s also saw a wave of giant leveraged buyouts. Mergers, acquisitions and L.B.O.’s, which had accounted for less than 5 percent of the profits of Wall Street brokerage houses in 1978, ballooned into an estimated 50 percent of profits by 1988… THROUGH ALL THIS, THE HISTORIC RELATIONSHIP between product and paper has been turned upside down. Investment bankers no longer think of themselves as working for the corporations with which they do business. These days, corporations seem to exist for the investment bankers…. In fact, investment banks are replacing the publicly held industrial corporations as the largest and most powerful economic institutions in America…. THERE ARE SIGNS THAT A VICIOUS spiral has begun, as each corporate player seeks to improve its standard of living at the expense of another’s.
          Corporate raiders transfer to themselves, and other shareholders, part of the income of employees by forcing the latter to agree to lower wages. January 29, 1989 (wwwDOT)

          After Clinton’s signed the five new banking laws that created the foreclosure crisis, the REBOOBLICANS did nothing to help the little guy. Instead they raided the tax payers and made sure the bad banking decisions were covered by AIG ‘insurance’ AS WELL AS the collateral (houses) of the people with foreclosed mortgages.

          I am amazed that the US government, in the midst of the worst financial crises ever, is content for short-selling to drive down the asset prices that the government is trying to support….The bald fact is that the combination of ignorance, negligence, and ideology that permitted the crisis to happen still prevails and is blocking any remedy. Either the people in power in Washington and the financial community are total dimwits or they are manipulating an opportunity to redistribute wealth from taxpayers, equity owners and pension funds to the financial sector. (Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury)

          This is who OWNS both the Republicans and the Democrats, heck Top Senate Democrat, Dick Durbin even confessed to it: “And the banks — hard to believe in a time when we’re facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created — are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place.”

          The Network of Global Corporate Control
          Stefania Vitali, James B. Glattfelder, Stefano Battiston

          The structure of the control network of transnational corporations affects global market competition and financial stability… We present the first investigation of the architecture of the international ownership network, along with the computation of the control held by each global player. We find that transnational corporations form a giant bow-tie structure and that a large portion of control flows to a small tightly-knit core of financial institutions. This core can be seen as an economic “super-entity” that raises new important issues both for researchers and policy makers.

          An earlier work by the same physicists.

          World’s Stocks Controlled by Select Few
          A pair of physicists at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich did a physics-based analysis of the world economy as it looked in early 2007. Stefano Battiston and James Glattfelder extracted the information from the tangled yarn that links 24,877 stocks and 106,141 shareholding entities in 48 countries, revealing what they called the “backbone” of each country’s financial market. These backbones represented the owners of 80 percent of a country’s market capital, yet consisted of remarkably few shareholders.

          “You start off with these huge national networks that are really big, quite dense,” Glattfelder said. “From that you’re able to … unveil the important structure in this original big network. You then realize most of the network isn’t at all important.”

          The most pared-down backbones exist in Anglo-Saxon countries,.. these same countries are considered by economists to have the most widely-held stocks in the world.. But while each American company may link to many owners, Glattfelder and Battiston’s analysis found that the owners varied little from stock to stock…

          In 2012, the Swiss Federal Institute in Zurich (SFI) released a comprehensive study entitled, “The Network of Global Corporate Control” which demonstrates how this relatively small consortium of corporations, and overwhelmingly dominated by mainly banks, actually run the world’s corporate daisy chain. According to their study, approximately 147 corporations form a “super entity” and have control 40% of the world’s corporate economy. The centre of the cartel includes the following giants: Barclays, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Vanguard Group, UBS, Deutsche Bank, Bank of New York Mellon Corp, Morgan Stanley, Bank of America Corp, and Société Générale….

          Karen Hudes is a graduate of Yale Law School and she worked in the legal department of the World Bank for more than 20 years. In fact, when she was fired for blowing the whistle on corruption inside the World Bank….

          According to Hudes, the elite use a very tight core of financial institutions and mega-corporations to dominate the planet. The goal is control. They want all of us enslaved to debt, they want all of our governments enslaved to debt, and they want all of our politicians addicted to the huge financial contributions that they funnel into their campaigns. Since the elite also own all of the big media companies, the mainstream media never lets us in on the secret that there is something fundamentally wrong with the way that our system works.

          Remember, this is not some “conspiracy theorist” that is saying these things. This is a Yale-educated attorney that worked inside the World Bank for more than two decades.….

          Do you really think us little guys, with no power, no money and only one vote have much control over the Republican party?

      • jdseanjd says:

        Thanks for your help with this URL, Gail. 🙂
        Don’t know how I naffed that up.

        I knew about the plosone article & Karen Hudes.
        The article seems genuine, but Hudes I would take with a large pinch of salt.

        Her husband, Barry Spergel, seems to be a major Agenda 21 architect, & her main target seems to be the RC Church & its riches.

        Please let me know what you think & have you had a look at the book I recommended ?


  6. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    Presentation is everything facts are irrelevant!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s