NOAA Demonstrates How To Defraud Taxpayers At Christmas

WASHINGTON — The Arctic and its future are looking dimmer every year, a new federal report says.

Spring snow cover in Eurasia reached a record low in April. Arctic summer sea ice, while not setting a new record, continued a long-term, steady decline. And Greenland set a record in August for the least amount of sunlight reflected in that month, said the peer-reviewed report from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and other agencies.

Report: Arctic losing more of signature snow – San Antonio Express-News

The fine scientists at NOAA are defrauding taxpayers with omissions of key information. Why did they refer only to April snow cover? Autumn snow cover just set an all-time record maximum.

nhland_season4 (3) Rutgers University Climate Lab :: Global Snow Lab

Since CO2 hit 350 PPM, autumn/winter snow cover is increasing much faster than the decline in spring/summer snow cover.

ScreenHunter_5555 Dec. 25 09.38Rutgers University Climate Lab :: Global Snow Lab

Arctic sea ice extent is at a 10 year maximum, and has been for the past two months.

ScreenHunter_5549 Dec. 25 08.28Ocean and Ice Services | Danmarks Meteorologiske Institut

Greenland has gained nearly 300 billion tons of ice since the end of August, and surface melt area has been generally below normal this year. NOAA forgot to mention these things.

ScreenHunter_5560 Dec. 25 13.44 ScreenHunter_5561 Dec. 25 13.47

Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Budget: DMI

NOAA’s intent was clearly to disinform, rather than to inform. So the question is, why does climate science peer-review allow such blatant propaganda through?

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to NOAA Demonstrates How To Defraud Taxpayers At Christmas

  1. gator69 says:

    “So the question is, why does climate science peer-review allow such blatant propaganda through?”

    The peer of a crook, is a crook. The peer of a lunatic, is a lunatic. Etc…

  2. daveandrews723 says:

    Climate science has become cult-like now. The ends justify the means for so many who have been indoctrinated. Peer review is a farce. They are in the same choir, all singing from the same sheet, with no critical or honest analysis whatsoever.

  3. kentclizbe says:

    “The authors pointed to several reasons for flawed studies, including “poor training of researchers in experimental design,” an “emphasis on making provocative statements,” and publications that don’t “report basic elements of experimental design.” They also said that “some scientists reputedly use a ‘secret sauce’ to make their experiments work—and withhold details from publication or describe them only vaguely to retain a competitive edge.”

    http://www.wsj.com/articles/hank-campbell-the-corruption-of-peer-review-is-harming-scientific-credibility-1405290747

  4. emsnews says:

    Note the cherry picking going on!

    NO mention of the super cold/super snow coverage of 80% of North America all last year! No, they hike over to a fraction of Europe and say, ‘No snow here! Warmest year ever!’ Sad.

    And disgusting since these same clowns roar at anyone mentioning the actual climate. ‘Weather, not climate!’ is their stupid retort.

  5. Gail Combs says:

    Steve I also noticed the shift of the ‘snowest’ from spring to fall. Does anyone know why?

  6. philjourdan says:

    And why now? April is spring. We are already into the next winter.

  7. Chewer says:

    It’s almost as bad a Dr. Feely’s report on ocean Ph using only data from 1988 through the end of the century to terrify the masses!

  8. Andy DC says:

    Peer reviewed propaganda. I am sure propaganda was also peer reviewed in the old Soviet Union.

  9. davidswuk says:

    NOAA didn`t f-o-r-g-e-t to mention, Steve, (with all respects) it
    A-V-O- I-D-E-D providing that information!!

  10. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    The simplest answer is usually best and in this case the misinformation is being driven by political appointees of Obama. There are in each department legal offices with the head a political appointment. These people are really political commissars there to make sure that the party line is followed.

  11. globalcooler says:

    Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog and commented:
    It just keeps coming. What does the NOAA think they are accomplishing by doing this? What do they gain? Who is pulling their strings? Will they ever be held accountable for these actions? Too many questions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s