1. Stop lying about sea ice. The amount of sea ice on Earth is near a record high.
2. Stop lying about global warming. There hasn’t been any significant troposphere warming for 18 years.
3. Stop lying about climate models. They are a disaster and 97% overpredict warming.
#4. Stop lying about sea level. 80% of tide gauges show less rise than the official “global average”. Many tide gauges show no rise in sea level, and almost none show any acceleration over the past 20 years.
Data and Station Information for ALAMEDA (NAVAL AIR STATION)
#5. Stop lying about drought. Droughts in the US are becoming less severe and less frequent, and the US has been wetter than normal over the past year.
Climate at a Glance: Time Series | National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)
#6. Stop lying about snow. Autumn/Winter snow cover has increased to record levels.
#7. Stop tampering with temperature data.
#8. Stop making up thermometer data where it doesn’t actually exist
By following any one of the simple principles of scientific integrity, a climate scientist can be guaranteed to be ostracized, have their funding cut off, have web sites set up to personally attack them, get fired, and possibly have the president of the US smear them.
It’s just easier to go along and collect a very nice pay check and be praised by your peers for your brilliance than to have a microgram of integrity.
They are not at fault. Selfishness is a problem that plagues all mankind.
However, there is reason to believe Stalin’s “Red Matrix of Deceit” – that geophysicists constructed for Stalin in 1945 to “save the world” – is finally crumbling:
So Happy New Year ! The arrogant illusion of tyrannical control of the world will end when the benevolent Higher Power at the core of the Sun is revealed.
December 30, 2014 at 4:55 pm
“They are not at fault. Selfishness is a problem that plagues all mankind. ”
They ARE at fault because it is their CHOICE to do what they do.
Correct we are each free to choose.
Dr, Bill Gray
Dr. Zbigniew Jaworowski
Dr. Murry Salby
Dr. Tim Ball
Dr. Tom Segalstad
Among others refused to submit to the bribes, peer pressure, firings and even lawsuits.
The Climastropogists could have stood up for science. They could have stood for the betterment of civilization. At minimum they could have slid sideways into another field and stayed neutral. Instead they made the choice to prostitute themselves. They KNOW they have harmed, robbed and even killed people They know they have brought their countries to the brink of economic disaster. They know they committed fraud, and that is why Phil Jones was contemplating suicide when the e-mails came out.
I have nothing but contempt for them. I hope they can be put on trial for fraud at a minimum or for man slaughter or treason. After the first deaths from ‘fuel poverty’ they had the chance to say ENOUGH and turned whistle blower. They did not therefore they are even more contemptible than the ‘facilitatiors’ in Hitler’s Germany.
But but but climate science is different than other fields of study.
They have no hope of accurately predicting climate with models, massaging the message is required to maintain the ‘climate shaman’ status.
Nice MMA style ground and pound to end what is sure to be the warmest year on record according to the upper echelon of the new world order religion. Just remember “figures do not lie but liars figure”.
Stop lying about sea level. 80% of tide gauges show less rise than the official “global average”…
The Israeli study showed 65% of all tide gauges showed sea levels falling or static…..
Do you have a link for that?
I have been using the 2.5 meter fall since the Holocene Optimum but it would be nice to have more current info to link to also.
Gail, I’m sure you of all people can find a more current measurement than a 5 or 6 thousand year old one from the HO… ; )
Niel, it is just such a great shut-up because they are always claiming ‘Climate’ is long term and ‘Deniers’ are cherry picking short term weather events. Also 2.5 meters (over 7 feet) makes the claimed rise of about 3 mm/year worldwide. (0.12 inches) look like the noise in the system that it actually is.
It also substantiates the fact Roman ports are found inland.
This article ar WUWT ames several more.
How much of the Roman ports being found far inland is due to sea level fall and how much to land rise? Do we know?
For the areas occupied by the Romans it was pretty close to zero or actually sinking! “..the pivot point is rather abrupt; Scotland is still rising due to the rebound effect which is correspondingly sinking England 2 millimetres into the North Sea each year.”
NIel, I also have a problem with this graph because it shows the the sea level 6,000 to 8,000 years ago lower than today when we know the sea level peaked and then fell.
Of course it is from WIKI and therefore has been William Connelly approved.
Of course it’s “approved.” It’s been properly smoothed and adjusted to get rid of those annoying peaks and valleys that don’t fit the narrative. If they do it “right” the first time they don’t have to send each other a bunch of incriminating emails figuring out how to hide it all after the fact.
Yep… Total shit….
Alarmists twist data and lie to continue funding… Promote the Cause…
You can’t use the mean of the tidal gauges and assume that total amount of subsidence will equal the total amount of uplift.
It probably is not correct to assume that sites are random enough that 50% are subsiding and 50% are up lifting so that the median corresponds to rising component in all of them, but it has to be a better estimate and it looks like it might be 0.
Don’t hold your breath…
This is great. Send it to your warmist pals
Stop lying about the polar bears.
They should also stop lying about tornados and hurricanes. It’s so easy to check tornado and hurricane frequency data for oneself, that it’s amazing they think they can get away with lies about that.
Stop lying about typhoons. The frequency of severe typhoons was far greater in the 1970’s and 1980’s that it has been from 2000-2014.
Stop lying about ocean temperatures.
Stop lying about ocean acidification.
Stop lying about glacier fed rivers drying up.
Stop lying about the frequency of extreme weather.
Stop the periodic re-writing of historical satellite sea level data.
Stop indoctrinating school children with global warming theory.
Stop squandering our national treasure.
Go find a real job.
Unfortunately if the climateers actually were to take notice of all this climate data they would have to conclude that climate sensitivity is under 1 C/doubling. Which is harmless, since it is a logarithmic relationship. There isn’t enough fossil fuel in the ground to produce CO2 based warming of 2 C.
In such light it was interesting yesterday that one of our more excitable climateers Prof Matthew England of UNSW acknowledged publicly that the PDO was responsible for the run up in global temperature during 1978-1998. He failed to make the connection with sensitivity, but what it shows is they know quite well that late 20thC warming was due to the ~60 year cycle, not CO2. No climate scientist could not make that connection in their own mind. So they can no longer even profess ignorance. Which confirms they are perpetuating CAGW for unscientific reasons.
Any thoughts on this data fraud? http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/12/23/touchy-feely-science-one-chart-suggests-theres-a-phraud-in-omitting-ocean-acidification-data-in-congressional-testimony/
It is refuted here:
How ever I am not surprised the ocean acidification fraud is showing up again because everything else has been shown to be junk science.
This just up at Team Watts: Initial conclusion? No pHraud. http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/12/30/ph-sampling-density/
It would seem to be more convenient incompetence as opposed to fraud perhaps?
Buffered systems have been know to Chemists for years. The oceans are buffered systems. This too has been know for years.
Ocean Acidification is a flat out LIE!
Another reference: http://www.infoplease.com/cig/chemistry/buffers.html
(And yes I am a chemist.)
Seems the most likely cause was laziness to me. I thing that it was put into the “too hard” pile is probably the best explanation.
I don’t buy into it either Gail and I’m certainly no chemist. The claim of “acidification” is both intentionally misleading and fraudulent. But I’m just saying that in the case of Ocean pH data analysis being left out of the Congressional testimony in question I think it was just too much work to compile all that data let alone analyze it to drawl conclusions from it.
What is the acid gas carrying capacity of an infinitely buffered alkaline solution?
This is a good start to a list of all the lies peddled constantly by the Warmistas and Climateers, but it is just the tip of the iceberg.
Fantastic! Thank you. And happy new year.
Stop lying about people who disagree with you.
Regarding models: they should also stop pretending that increased model resolution provides a better result. It does not, as there’s no more real data going in, so more ‘invented’ data is used, making the result LESS reliable [h/t to Prof Tim Ball for making this point in his recent book.]. Why this very obvious point is missed by both the climate (so called) scientists and also the MSM beats me.
Apparently the alarmists have never heard of Bonini’s Paradox:
“The less information a model carries about its subject, the less useful it’s going to be in helping someone understand that subject. And yet, the more information a model carries about its subject, the less useful it’s going to be in helping someone understand any single point of that subject.”
“This leads to models of considerable complexity, the tragedy being that complexity usually does not pay for the holist”
de Wit, C.T. (1978). Summative Address 1. “Plant Relations in Pastures”. Wilson, J.R.. (Ed.) CSIRO
The IPCC point blank says their models are crap:
Yet over the past 15 years we have been treated to more and more crap science and shriller cries of Doom.
Never ever imply again that the man burning fossil fuels is going to cause a “run away green house effect” and become like the atmosphere on Venus which has about a 96% concentration of C02 under tremendous pressure, with clouds containing Sulfuric Acid and surface temp in excess of 460 C.
The temperature gains need not be so extreme as Venus’ for our Earthly goose to be cooked. We are headed for 4 deg C, 5 times current warming. Nature asks, “Feeling lucky, punk?”
I know, why should I bother?
A lot of creative graph making here. Let’s just take #2, your precious hiatus, as an example of your intellectual integrity. And if #2 is in doubt, well..why spend any time on the rest of it?
First, tell me IF warming stopped WHY did it stop? Did the sun cool in the last 18 years? Did CO2 stop absorbing IR? Did God just change His (Her) mind? Did a black hole suck heat out of the atmosphere? Or do you not “believe” in causation.
OR, as the scientists discovered, have the oceans absorbed a bit more heat than usual due to changing wind patterns.
Second, “is climate change, at last, over?” I am not convinced of that, as I have not seen any evidence of it. For example,
The hiatus: Warming has stopped? Not.
New study explains the role of oceans in global ‘warming hiatus’
The Planet Just Had Its Warmest August On Record
The Planet Just Had Its Hottest September On Record
Hottest October And Year To Date On Record Globally, NOAA Reports
Hottest 12 Months On Record: NOAA Data ‘Show No Pause In Warming’
The global temperature data for 2013 are now published. 2010 and 2005 remain the warmest years since records began in the 19th Century. 1998 ranks third in two records, and in the analysis of Cowtan & Way, which interpolates the data-poor region in the Arctic with a better method, 2013 is warmer than 1998 (even though 1998 was a record El Nino year, and 2013 was neutral).
– See more at: http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2014/01/global-temperature-2013/#sthash.o7XcJbwh.dpuf
It is odd that with all of this ‘knowledge’, none of the climate models built upon this ‘foundation’ predicted the pause. Oh but they can hindcast! 😆
And the first ‘evidence’ she picks is Forbes- Peter Gleick the ‘ethics’ chairman who should be in jail for wire fraud.
A History of Solar Activity over Millennia
Notice that sunspot number is only one measurement of solar activity. That paper is quite an interesting read. However since sunspots are what most people are familiar with I will stick with them.
What the Warmists neglect is that the Modern grand maximum ended in cycle 22 not 23. 23 was a ‘transition cycle’ Notice 21 and 22 are ‘short’ cycles which is characteristic of strong cycles.
Cycle 21 started in June 1976 and lasted 10 years and 3 months.
Cycle 22 started in September 1986 and lasted 9 years and 8 months.
Cycle 23 started in May 1996 and lasted 12 years and 6 months.
Cycle 24 started in December 2008.
Notice the starting minima of 21 and 22 are stronger than that of 23 and the start of 24 is scraping bottom.
You can also see the change in albedo soon after the start of cycle 23.
This paper out of the Air Force Research Lab and Jet Propulsion Lab is probably one of the best on Solar Variability and Climate change: Geomagnetic aa index and Global Surface Temperature
From comments at http://joannenova.com.au/2015/01/happy-new-year/#comments
January 1, 2015 at 10:41 am · Reply
happy new year one and all…
short, to the point, easy to follow – have emailed it to less sceptic friends & acquaintances:
Steven Goddard: New Years Resolutions For Climate Scientists
January 1, 2015 at 11:13 am · Reply
Great. He could add
More new year’s resolutions to add to the list
Stop lying about ‘ocean acidification’.
Stop lying about the imminent destruction of the great barrier reef
Stop lying about massive sea level rises
Stop lying about 97% of scientists
Stop lying about record temperatures
Stop lying about bush fires being climate change
Stop lying about drought being climate change
Stop lying about floods being climate change
Stop flying. Just stop flying. 30,000 people to Rio, Copenhagen, New York, Durban, Dubai, Lima.
Stop buying up depressed beach front property, Tim and Al.”
Perhaps we should put the whole list together and send it to each scientific society, each journal and the dean of each university, not to mention all the politicians.
Sure, but the current dean at my former employment has been fired as she wouldn’t go along with the new prez. He wants a major in Criminal Investigations because of the popularity of CSI and spin-offs he thinks he can swindle tuition and loan moneys from uninformed high school grads,
Happy New Year and thanks for your chemistry.
Sums up the sorry pseudoscientific situation very well.
Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
A dignified scientist / politician / journalist should read this post using basic scientific rigour to recognise the empirical evidence presented that massively contradicts the human CO2-derived “Global Warming” hypothesis/hysteria that has tragically become the greatest scientific scandal and subsequent environmental religion in the history of mankind.
The very fact that the exact (climatic) opposites are now occurring of what the ‘experts’ predicted time and time again would happen, should be enough to blow this scam out of the ball park for good.
The dignified and the “97%” consensus minions might perhaps take heed of the saying out of language taught to students of medicine ~ “There’s no such thing as truth in medicine, only current information.”
Stop lying and start practicing science, even if it means you got it wrong. After all, that is what science is all about – falsifying a hypothesis, in order to advance knowledge and learn.
Best post yet!
I love the graphics.
Reblogged this on Green Jihad and commented:
Please read Steven Goddard’s New Year’s Resolution for Climate Scientists.
Happy New Year everyone. This is a great compilation. It amazes me how the Cagw crowd are still in existence. But, Politics is all about spin and deception. Never mind the facts.
All the best for 2015.