NASA Rewriting The Past To Suit The Needs Of Their Climate Agenda

In 1981, NASA showed the 1930’s as the warmest decade globally.

 

ScreenHunter_5766 Jan. 04 10.43

http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

That didn’t suit the global warming narrative, so by 1999 they had almost erased the warm 1930’s

ScreenHunter_5764 Jan. 04 09.55 http://www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_07/

However, the small bit of warming from 1940 to 2000 didn’t suit the needs of the Hockey Stick, so NASA has since completely erased the warm 1930’s

Fig.A (1)

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.A.gif

The animation below shows the changes NASA made to the global surface temperature record between 1981 and 1999, and then from 1981 to 2014.

NASASurfaceTemp1981-1999-2014

From: Tom Wigley <wigley@ucar.edu>
To: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <santer1@llnl.gov>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to NASA Rewriting The Past To Suit The Needs Of Their Climate Agenda

  1. daveandrews723 says:

    Even under their most recent adjustment it shows the earth has warmed only about 1.2 degrees since 1880 (134 years) with almost half of that increase in the 60 years between 1880 and 1940. Just where is the CO2/AGW footprint in any of this?

  2. gator69 says:

    “WTB”

    I want it on a t-shirt.

  3. I’ve seen so many of these clear frauds and felt each time that this scam was about to fall, that whilst this and Jo Nova’s “Acidgate” ought to get me excited, what I know is that yet again I’m going to be disappointed by the total lack of press interested in the clearest possible evidence of fraud.

    If this was some banker fixing interest rates, like the LIBOR scandal in the UK, there would be immediate investigate, prosecution and minister’s heads would roll.

    But somehow, a $1trillion fraud in science doesn’t even make it into most of the numpty press.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s