Learning To Think Like A Progressive

Being a progressive means linking any two pieces of unrelated information together to justify your need to control other people. Check out this piece of progressive logic.

ScreenHunter_6039 Jan. 13 16.17ScreenHunter_6037 Jan. 13 16.13ScreenHunter_6038 Jan. 13 16.13

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Learning To Think Like A Progressive

  1. gator69 says:

    ED HENRY, FOX NEWS SENIOR WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: Why wouldn’t you use the phrase right there, that we are gonna take on Islamic extremism. You said all forms of violent extremism —

    JOSH EARNEST, WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: She asked me what the summit would discuss and all forms of violent — violent extremism would be discussed, and obviously the most potent and certainly the most, you know, graphic display that we’ve seen in recent days is, again, is motivated by those individuals that seek to invoke the name of Islam to carry out these violent attacks, and that’s certainly something we wanna work very hard to counter and mitigate and we’ve got a strategy that we’ve been discussing for some time to exactly do that.

    HENRY: What is the most potent form according to you of extremism, why isn’t the summit on countering Islamic extremism?

    EARNEST: Because violent extremism is something that we wanna be focused on and it’s not just — it’s not just Islamic violent extremism that we want to counter there. There are other forms of —

    HENRY: Paris, Australia, Canada, isn’t the thread through them that it’s Islamic extremism?

    EARNEST: Well, certainly those are — the examples you cite are examples of individuals who’ve cited Islam as they’d carry out — carried out acts of violence. There’s — there’s no — there’s no arguing that.

    Then what are we arguing about? Rioters in Ferguson? The NRA?

    • Dave says:

      Obama’s choices for spokes-idiots are strange. Josh Earnest sounds like a putz to me. Instead of being white house press secretary he sounds more suited to be a fashion designer. I would think you’d select someone that came across as authoritative whether its a man or a woman rather than some man-child “metrosexual”.

  2. jay352 says:

    Progressives don’t need to read and learn about facts..All the facts they need are already in their heart 🙂

  3. markstoval says:

    Well, finally you hit the nail on the head. It is public schooling causing the problems as you say in your tweet. So, let us move to more home schooling and private schooling. 🙂

    Disclaimer: I think children should be homeschooled if possible, private schooled if homeschooling is out, and not schooled at all if public school is the only alternative.

    ~ Mark

  4. MrX says:

    Progressives had to call themselves that because if they didn’t constantly remind themselves how forward thinking they are, no one would know.

  5. Dave N says:

    Lanza’s mother was also a member* of the Newtown Bridge Club; they must be a terrorist organisation.

    (*Actually, I don’t know whether she was, but you get the point)

  6. philjourdan says:

    So when did his mother go on a shooting rampage?

  7. Jason Calley says:

    I am not sure what, exactly, an “NRA certificate” is, but the NRA confirms that neither Adam nor his mother were ever NRA members. I suspect that the so-called “Progressives” will not shout “Once again, a non-NRA member murders!”

  8. Bill S says:

    NRA provides free firearm safety instruction and issues a certificate upon completion. At least was true in 1962 when I got mine.

  9. Pathway says:

    I received my Pro-Marksman certificate on June 17, 1963 and have yet to commit murder.

  10. Jimmy Haigh says:

    What if there was a National Muslim Rifle Association? Would they try to ban that too?

  11. stpaulchuck says:

    I also don’t remember any killer shouting they were killing because someone disrespected the 2nd Amendment!

  12. Streetcred says:

    I trained in the military … top marksman and demolitions expert … since returning to civilian life 35 years ago, I haven’t shot or blown up anybody.

  13. dom says:

    Yup, liberals aren’t known for mastering the application(s) of Boolean Algebra; perhaps that is why so many of them also disregard the application of categorical imperatives (such as Kant’s) too. The fork in the road where a person follows the impulse to depart from logic and into emotion seems to comes very (extremely) early in the cognitive-journey for some people. Or is it simply the money?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s