If You Like Your Current Climate, You Can Keep It. Period. End Of Story

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

19 Responses to If You Like Your Current Climate, You Can Keep It. Period. End Of Story

  1. gator69 says:

    “Read my lips: no new temperatures.”

  2. au1corsair says:

    Economics policy–fail.

    Peace initiatives–fail.

    Climate–refuses to cooperate.

    It’s always somebody else’s fault!

    When are we getting a president in the White House?

  3. omanuel says:

    No one likes the current climate under a totalitarian, one-world government.

    That was the threat we all feared fifty-seven years ago, when the USSR took control of space by launching Sputnik in 1957.

    President John F. Kennedy blocked the USSR plans in 1960 by starting the US Apollo Program.

    jFK was assassinated in 1963, his brother, Robert, was assassinated in 1968, and Henry Kissinger secretly flew to China in 1971 to re-establish peace with the USSR and China by ending the Apollo Program.

    President Nixon announced the end of the Apollo Program in January 1972.

    Since then, the US space program and NASA have been completely gutted.

    Today, in 2015, the USA relies on Russian rockets for space travel to the International Space Station.

    Senator Cruz may be seriously trying to salvage NASA’s space program:


    It is not clear if Russia will allow the US to again compete for control of space and the right of people to regain self-governance on planet Earth.

  4. Mike says:

    Reblogged this on makeaneffort and commented:
    I will Lie directly to you because You’re Stupid.

  5. Emanuelle Goldstein says:

    I found this priceless Google Scholar Alert in my Inbox

    Death Matters: Victimization by Particle Matter from Coal Fired Power Plants in the US, a Green Criminological View (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10612-015-9266-7)
    MJ Lynch, KL Barrett – Critical Criminology, 2015
    Abstract The present study examines deaths and diseases associated with pollution from
    coal fired power plants (CFPPs) and compares the volume of those deaths and diseases to
    deaths and injuries associated with street crimes.

    Did you know that you are being “victimized” by particles, and it’s just as bad as being hit with a baseball bat by a street thug? Who knew?

    • gator69 says:

      “To estimate the PM2.5-related benefits associated with reducing emissions from EGUs, the PIE model first calculates the impact on ambient air quality…”

      More modeled mayhem.

    • Gail Combs says:

      A question on climate change and asthma

      Is the University of Rochester trying to hide its illegal human experiments?

      We learned last October, that the University of Rochester has been conducting the same sort of air pollution experiments on human subjects as EPA researchers. Based on documents we obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, we determined that the EPA-conducted experiments were flagrantly illegal.

      Suspecting that the University of Rochester experiments were similarly illegal we wrote the University of Rochester general counsel….
      [lots of back and forth and finally]
      We responded today (May 15) as follows:

      Dear Mr. Spencer,

      Thank you for your note, however, without seeing the documents that I have previously requested, your conclusion has no demonstrable basis in fact and, so, this matter is hardly “closed.”

      Aside from the black box/secret nature of the review, the unidentified board certified pulmonologists cannot be presumed to have any expertise or knowledge whatsoever with the current EPA-determined science of PM2.5 and/or diesel exhaust.

      So the review you claim to have occurred appears to be nothing more than whitewash.

      At this point, there can be no doubt that the EPA-funded PM2.5 human clinical research URochester has conducted flatly violates the Common Rule as well as the Nuremberg Code.

      Consequently, the physicians conducting the experiments have likely violated New York state law by committing batteries on the study subjects.

      Keep in mind that one student has already died from URochester negligence in conducting an air pollution clinical study.

      I renew my request for copies of the relevant IRB applications and consent forms. I can assure you that they will not remain secret in perpetuity and I caution you against destroying them.

      University of Rochester and their history of lying:
      The University of Rochester experimented on my Mother. First she was exposed to a high level of radiation (called an accident) and then was used as a guinea pig in the first human chemotherapy trials which finally killed her. She died at age 62 from multiple heart attacks not cancer so the trial was a ‘success.’ Her heart had been fine prior to the Chemo. She had extensive tests before her radical mastectomy three months before. The doctors were well aware that chemotherapy attacked the heart but they played deaf and dumb. Chem Engineering News had just published a recent article stating Chemo ‘affected the heart’ which I repeatedly pointed out to the cancer doctor and the heart doctor but I got “That is not my area of expertise” from both – lying B@$t@rds.

      Mayo Clinic, Where my Mother went for a second opinion prior to starting chemo, and Harvard Health Publications now both say Chemo increases heart disease (and so does radiation therapy) Nice to know Mom helped advance medical knowledge but it would have been nice if they didn’t take the experiment to the point when the UNKNOWING Guinea Pig died.
      Congressional Hearings On Radiation Experiments…. REPORT: “American Nuclear Guinea Pigs: Three Decades of Radiation Experiments on U.S. Citizens”


      March 22, 2013 EPA un-scrubs data base of experiment exposing children to diesel exhaust

      Presumably our FOIA request asking who ordered the data deletion caused a rethink at EPA.

      On February 25, I reported that EPA had scrubbed from its data base evidence of agency-funded University of Southern California researchers testing diesel exhaust on children.

      On February 27, JunkScience.com submitted a FOIA request asking for:

      … copies of e-mails,telephone logs and other documentary evidence explaining who made changes, and why changes were made to the EPA extramural grants database concerning the 2005 Progress Report for grant number R831861C002 between the dates December 14, 2012 and February 25, 2013. I am specifically interested in knowing why the progress report was modified (i.e., text deletion) between those two dates.

      Today (March 22), just for grins, I went back to check whether any changes had been made to the data base — surprise, surprise — there was the original document entirely restored.

      So here’s the document trail…..

      Interestingly, this is the precise pattern of conduct followed by the EPA when we exposed the deletion of grants during the Peter Gleick scandal.

    • darrylb says:

      Yes there were some mercury, arsenic and sulfur oxide ions in coal burning emissions.
      However, work was done to remove the particles from emissions. None of these are considered to be greenhouse gases.
      Incidentally, sulfur oxides, which are also prevalent in volcanic emissions will cool the atmosphere.

  6. Lance says:

    I like my lies, so i’ll repeat them….

  7. Wonder why nobody talks about acid rain anymore. Wonder if any young people have ever heard about it?

    • Gail Combs says:

      The EPA already regulates sulfur so that issue is dead besides CO2 has a much bigger gain.

      Who controls the food supply controls the people; who controls the energy can control whole continents; who controls money can control the world. ~ Henry Kissinger

      MONEY — Federal Reserve Act of 1913. the ‘reserve’ is effectively zero
      (Remove *)

      FOOD — Food Safety Modernization Act (Jan 2011) handed effective control of US farming to the WTO/OIE and FAO (WTO agreement on Agriculture) they have already written ‘Good Farming Practices’ and Good Agriculture Practices’ that US farmers must comply with.

      ENERGY — this is what CAGW is really about.

  8. Hugh K says:

    But….but…I was really like super-excited waiting to see Obama wave his magic pen halting the rise of oceans so our planet might begin to heal. Why do the Dems hate polar bears?

  9. Gail Combs says:

    Tony, Why are so many of my links causing word-press to not even dump the comment to moderation?




    Are examples of three live links not verboten on your site.

    I had the same problem at Jo Novas and at E.M. Smith’s —WEIRD!

    (And yes I shut down and restarted and I use Opera and Linux)

  10. omanuel says:

    Thanks to the insight and ability of a few bloggers like you to communicate, “The Great Social Experiment of 1945-2015″ is over.

    Click to access Social_Experiment.pdf

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s