When Studying Temperature History, Old Temperatures Are Meaningless

ScreenHunter_802 Jan. 20 17.22

Apparently Gavin went back in time and took new measurements. Do alarmists have any idea how irrational they are?

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

28 Responses to When Studying Temperature History, Old Temperatures Are Meaningless

  1. Timo Soren says:

    Keep at it!

  2. Billy Liar says:

    What Marc the Vegan means is -‘Winston Schmidt at The Ministry of Truth was supposed to have destroyed it after he had rewritten it to match the current party line’.

  3. gofer says:

    Old temps don’t fit the models, therefore there must be new temps created. Otherwise the whole con job collapses.

  4. Dave N says:

    We already know it’s “old” because it was produced a while ago. Slavin should explain why it is “meaningless”.

    • I suppose his real name is Angela Harris, the County Manager of Franklin County, NC. She hates old stuff and destroys it when she finds it:

      http://fcnonews.blogspot.com/2014/01/franklin-citizens-express-anger-at_7.html
      http://fcnonews.blogspot.com/2014/01/commissioners-comment-on-burning-of.html

      • Gail Combs says:

        WHAT! The book burning has already started!!!!!

        Perhaps we should burn every thing SHE OWNS and see how she likes it. Those documents WERE NOT HERS they belonged to the citizens of the county, the citizens of North Carolina and the USA.

        Were the Archives in the Kremlin burned? The Nazi archives? The Archives in the vatican?

        I do not care what the excuse you do not burn history!

        • Ben Vorlich says:

          Gail,
          Agree 100% so much knowledge has been lost. Knowledge is what dictators fear the most.

        • Gail Combs says:

          NOTE:
          The books/papers were mildewed. The state people took what they wanted and told her to dispose of the rest. The historical society found a place to store the material and arrived to pick it up only to find it had already been burned….

          I can just see something happening to my husband and I, our heirs coming in and finding most of my leather saddles, bridles and harnesses mildewed form the damp summer we just had so they destroy everything. They would have destroyed well over $10,000 of perfectly good high quality equipment that a bit of elbow grease could save. (I am highly allergic to mildew so cleaning everything is very slow going even with a mask.)

        • AndyG55 says:

          “you do not burn history!”

          Unless you want to re-write it. !!!

  5. nutso fasst says:

    Steven, science is constantly advancing our knowledge. For example, remember when Obama said in 2012 that “what we do know is the temperature around the globe is increasing faster than was predicted even 10 years ago” and people called him a liar?

    NCDC’s global temperature dataset for 1880-2014 has been improved with 122 changes from their previous 1880-2013 dataset, including a warming of 2013 and a cooling of 2011.

    As a result, what would have been a decadal trend over 4 years of about +0.14°C is now +0.51°C, higher that the IPCCs most dire projections.

    This scientific advancement not only made Obama honest, it made him prescient.

  6. Menicholas says:

    <>

    I have been pondering this, and actively questioning many of them about it. I seems clear that the answer is, incredibly, no.
    It is quite difficult, for some, to ever admit they may have been mistaken about anything.
    For these sort, who have stated publicly and repeatedly that there is no question and no debate, relenting now means admitting that they were not simply mistaken, but are in fact unscientific blowhards.
    They are in full blown denial, because they must be. Their egos demand it.
    Hoax deniers.
    I have lately been wondering, and asking, what it would take for them to reconsider their steadfast belief?
    If, for example, ten years from now there has been no warming, if there has instead been cooling, what then?
    Every time I have asked this, it has been the end of the conversation.
    For all these years, the hypothetical case that the globe may warm has boiled their blood,
    but it seems that considering this sort of hypothetical freezes their brains.
    Ironic indeed.

  7. stpaulchuck says:

    ROFLMAO!!
    he’s cut from the same idiot cloth as the ones who rave that the Constitution is no longer valid because it was written over 200 years ago by Old White Men.

  8. sfx2020 says:

    Did I mention how that”old graph” looks a lot like the current HASDCRUT 3 data?

  9. sabretoothed says:

    They have not been adjusted UPWARDS to increase the UHE lol get with the program!

  10. _Jim says:

    I’m going to use that ‘excuse’ the next time my ‘record’ is cited: “Those events are old and pretty much meaningless.” LOL

    Bald-faced lies are the best …

  11. sabretoothed says:

    If it is so hot, why has this not melted? This melted during the Holocene Climatic Optimum 6000-8000BP and is only 3500-4000 years old http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hans_Tausen_Iskappe

  12. MrX says:

    Doesn’t his tweet imply that someone in 2055 will say the exact same thing and that current charts are meaningless?

    • AndyG55 says:

      I like it 🙂

      But we are already saying that about GISS and HadCrut, because of the two rabid warmistas that somehow got in charge of them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s