Smoking Gun Of Incompetence At The IPCC

In 2001, the UN IPCC said “Mild winter temperatures will decrease heavy snowstorms”

BepTksDCMAEkCHw (1)

IPCC Third Assessment Report – Climate Change 2001 – Complete online versions | GRID-Arendal – Publications – Other

Bdi6xZUCEAAYLXL

IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

Since they made that forecast, UN headquarters has seen five of its ten largest snowstorms.

ScreenHunter_6453 Jan. 26 06.26

Updates on Historic Northeast Blizzard

Advertisements

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Smoking Gun Of Incompetence At The IPCC

  1. omanuel says:

    Standing in the ruins of Hiroshima in AUG 1945 [1], Paul Kazuo Kuroda realized that “. . . the beginning of the world may have been just like this.”

    The UN was formed in OCT 1945 and world leaders began using federal research grants to guide science away from Kuroda’s finding, toward goals in UN’s Agenda 21 [2].

    That is how Kuroda’s finding in AUG 1945 became “the greatest secret of the universe” in 2009.

    The UN’s primary goal may have been to avoid the possibility of worldwide nuclear annihilation – mentioned in the last paragraph of Aston’s 1922 Nobel Lecture [3] – by forbidding public knowledge of the source of energy that destroyed Hiroshima.

    This practice violated basic principles of science but remained practically invisible to the public until the UN’s Agenda 21 [2] was finally published in 1972.

    Climategate emails in late Nov 2009 showed how the UN’s IPCC used UN’s Agenda 21 to guide global temperature data.

    Princeton Professor Will Happer explains in this video [5] how the myth of carbon pollution is used by the UN today to hide Kuroda’s 1945 discovery.

    References:

    1. P. K. Kuroda, The Origin of the Chemical Elements and the Oklo Phenomenon (Springer Publishing, 1982) 165 pp. The quote is from p. 2 http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Chemical-Elements-Oklo-Phenomenon/dp/3642686699 or http://www.springer.com/chemistry/physical+chemistry/book/978-3-642-68669-6

    2. “United Nations Agenda 21” (1972) http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/index.htm

    3. Aston’s PROMISE & WARNING (Dec 1922); CHAOS & FEAR (Aug -Sept 1945)
    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf

    4. “Solar energy,” Advances in Astronomy (submitted for on-line review, 6 JAN 2015):
    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy_For_Review.pdf

    5. Will Happer, “The Myth of Carbon Pollution” (2014 Video)
    http://marshall.org/events/the-myth-of-carbon-pollution/

    • omanuel says:

      I.e., misinformation from the UN’s IPCC is not caused by incompetence but by design to advance UN Agenda 21:

      http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/index.htm

    • omanuel says:

      Tonight I am pleased to conclude that Occam’s razor shaved Big Brother!

      • omanuel says:

        Big Brother’s beard had been growing for seventy years and “National” Academies of the Sciences had agreed on names for each whisker: Consensus Model of Global Climate; Big Bang Cosmology; Standard Solar Model; Standard Nuclear Model, etc., etc.!

      • omanuel says:

        Here’s how whiskers sprouted from Big Brother ‘s chin:

        In 1946, the UK’s Royal Society first published changes in the foundations of astronomy, astrophysics, climatology, cosmology, etc., by changing the internal composition of the ordinary Sun-like stars from:

        a.) Mostly iron (Fe) in 1945, to
        b.) Mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946

        Supposedly independent “National” Academies of the Sciences worldwide all agreed to this absurd change, without any discussion or debate.

        It took several decades for me to recognize that all of these Standard, Consensus Models grew from the chin of the same Big Brother, into a growth well-suited for Occam’s razor

  2. Gail Combs says:

    Interesting that there is no big storms during the late 1960s to early 1970s when the crops were failing and the world was worried about a coming Ice Age.

    The 1974 CIA report: “A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems”

    …. Since 1972 the grain crisis has intensified…. Since 1969 the storage of grain has decreased from 600 million metric tons to less than 100 million metric tons – a 30 day supply… many governments have gone to great lengths to hide their agricultural predicaments from other countries as well as from their own people…

    pg 9
    The archaeologists and climatotologists document a rather grim history… There is considerable evidence that these empires may not have been undone by barbarian invaders but by climatic change…. has tied several of these declines to specific global cool periods, major and minor, that affected global atmospheric circulation and brought wave upon wave of drought to formerly rich agricultural lands.

    Refugees from these collapsing civilizations were often able to migrate to better lands… This would be of little comfort however,… The world is too densely populated and politically divided to accommodate mass migration.

    Page 18 talks of coming glaciation.
    Scientists are confident that unless man is able to effectively modify the climate, the northern regions… will again be covered with 100 to 200 feet of ice and snow. That this will occur within the next 2,500 years they are quite positive; that it may occur sooner is open to speculation….

    • bleakhouses says:

      I was going to comment that the pattern certainly appears to follow pre adjustment temperatures very closely but I am not one to confuse correlation with causation like those “experts.”

  3. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    The question should be have they gotten anything right … lol

  4. Stephen Richards says:

    Doesn’t the UKMO Betts contribute significantly to this group?

  5. Dave N says:

    The standard excuse is that “science has progressed further since then”. I doubt their understanding of climate has progressed enough in 14 years to make such a statement, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they were making claims of decreased snowstorms as little as 5 or 6 years ago.

    Funny how when things don’t go as predicted, science suddenly “progresses”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s