Hansen and Schmidt Removing The 1940’s Blip

In 1981, Hansen reported high temperatures at the Northern Latitudes (23.6N – 90N) around 1940, followed by a strong cooling. But that didn’t support the theory, so NASA’s finest simply made the 1940’s blip disappear through repeated data tampering.

NASANorthernLatititudes1981-1999-2015

1981 version : 1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

1999 version : 1999_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

Current version : Fig.B.gif (407×678)

They climategate team didn’t like the 1940’s blip, so they disappeared it.

From: Tom Wigley <wigley@ucar.edu>
To: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk>
Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <santer1@llnl.gov>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Hansen and Schmidt Removing The 1940’s Blip

  1. _Jim says:

    This … is what fraud looks like …

    • gator69 says:

      Interesting that almost to a person, leftists cannot see obvious fraud in their own ranks.

      • Gail Combs says:

        All that is important to Leftists is ‘The Cause’™

        They are much like ISIS in that lying and cheating and killing are perfectly acceptable in the name of ‘The Cause’™ Why else do you think they have so much sympathy for those killers?

    • sfx2020 says:

      With out the emails, would we even know about this? That there was a group effort, done in secret, to alter the presentation of past data? (isn’t there a word for that? When a group plans in secret to do something like this?)

  2. _Jim says:

    From: Tom Wigley
    To: Phil Jones
    Subject: 1940s,
    Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009

    Phil,

    Here are some speculations on correcting SSTs to partly explain the 1940s warming blip.

    If you look at the attached plot you will see that the land also shows the 1940s blip (as I’m sure you know).

    So, if we could reduce the ocean blip by, say, 0.15 degC,then this would be significant for the global mean — but we’d still have to explain the land blip.

    It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

    – – – – – – – – – – – – –

    IMAGINE if Exxon-Mobil tried to ‘adjust’ their books using book keeping like this, this would be construed as a conspiracy to commit fraud by the IRS if this was a maneuver to juggle the books to avoid paying taxes … and ‘the left’ would never let anyone forget this (and rightly so). But let NOAA/NASA GISS commit this fraud? Nary a word! Crickets!

    • omanuel says:

      It is FRAUD, plain and simple. The National Academies of Science, the federal research agencies, and the publishers of scientific journals are trying to hide the source of energy that destroyed Hiroshima – the force that creates and sustains atoms, lives and worlds.

      Their chance of success is zero, but they are incapable of grasping their fate.

  3. Old Goat says:

    Tesco tried something similar and got away with it for a while, before the whole house of cards came crashing down around their ears. Now, they are in deep doo-doo, firing staff, closing stores, and pulling the plug on new ones.

    There may be hope, yet…

  4. omanuel says:

    Stalin’s little helpers in publishers and worldwide National Academies of science hid the inversion of nuclear structure at ~150 amu (when alpha emission starts) to prevent the public from knowledge of the energy that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki – neutron repulsion!

    After forming the UN in OCT 1945 to take totalitarian control of society, NAS and publishers changed physics to hide Neutron Repulsion in cores of atoms, planets, stars and galaxies heavier than 150 atomic mass units (when nuclear structure inverts [1] into neutrons at the core; neutron-proton pairs at the nuclear surface).

    Whether or not skeptics succeed, world leaders will certainly fail to control God’s force of creation.

    1. See page 3, “Solar energy,” Adv. Astronomy (submitted for on-line review, 6 JAN 2015): https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy_For_Review.pdf

    • Robertv says:

      The biggest problem for those with absolute power is that they are mortal too. Once they can solve that problem We The People are no longer needed certainly not in large numbers. The small guy always has been and will be the cannon fodder and the guinea pig for the elite.

      “A soldier will fight long and hard for a bit of colored ribbon”

      Napoleon Bonaparte

  5. Ri-chard says:

    Steven, this is a little off point but thought you may find it of interest. I’m not sure how I feel about the global warming statements Maybe you could assist them with those facts.

    • omanuel says:

      Chem-trails are used to frighten the public. They are used at sunrise and sunset to demonstrate the bluff and bluster of wannabe world rulers.

      Chem-trails may appear bigger than the Sun, like the egos of those who think they rule the world, but in fact they too are mostly bluff and bluster.

      • omanuel says:

        Big Brother is nothing but a bunch of hopeless cowards trying to control the world by scaring the public.

        Our fears are a good measure of their success.

        • Robertv says:

          They control the education brainwash system. That’s all they need. Now the question is who your kid believes more, the teachers or the parents. Would your kid tell the teacher they are wrong or the parents they are wrong. Imagine being a kid of a climate denier. It was the Hitler Jugend fighting until the end for their beloved lider. Remember that most kids have been brainwashed for most of their live.

        • Robertv says:

          of their lives

        • Gail Combs says:

          Robert they now start as young as a few months old in GOVERNMENT REGULATED preschools.

          That was what the child abuse scare several years ago was all about. The Progressives wanted to be in control of the kiddies from birth on so they manufactured child abuse scandals and got people to accept government regulation of the raising of their children.

          http://www.religioustolerance.org/ra_edent.htm

          http://www.cyberussr.com/hcunn/witch/fells.html

          In Scotland it is even worse. Every Child in Scotland to Be Supervised by State-Appointed Busybody: True danger lies in the notion that the state should decide if you are parenting your kids correctly.

        • Robertv says:

          In the near future being a climate change denier will be a reason for government to take your kid away.

        • omanuel says:

          They are good at deceit but totally powerless over the creator and sustainer of every atom, life and world.

          Big Brother is now going down.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Robert they have already started.
          google child abuse spanking religious

          And what do you find?
          The Week brought to you by GEICO aka Warren Buffett

          Christians have no moral rationale for spanking their children

          …Eighty percent of born-again Christians believe that spanking is acceptable. This is 15 percent higher than the general population….

          Many social scientists have explored the effects of spanking on children, and the majority of their results are overwhelming negative. Elizabeth Gershoff, a professor at University of Texas, spent 15 years systematically reviewing hundreds of studies conducted over more than 60 years on corporal punishment.

          “There’s no study that I’ve ever done that’s found a positive consequence of spanking,” Gershoff said. She adds that spanking “doesn’t make your kids better behaved. You think it does. … It doesn’t.”…..

          Recent studies have also shown that children who are spanked may develop less grey matter in their brains, which hampers their ability to evaluate rewards and consequences or make critical decisions. This may also predispose them to addiction or depression. Contrary to Ingram’s (and James Dobson’s and other conservative Christians’) assertions, the more you physically punish your children, the less self-control they have….

          And I thought Loony lewandowsky’s peer-reviewed papers were bad…

          What the heck do these pampered ivory tower types think happened to kids for the first 120,000 years of mankind’s existence? Heck child labor laws were not really enacted till 1938 and third world countries still have child slavery. My mares will nip their foals in the butt if they bite while nursing and my goats will discipline their kids. Pity the poor kid/foal/lamb who tries to nurse from the wrong Mom! Animal mothers are not all sweetness and light by any stretch of the imagination.

          Protecting the Unprotected: Religious Extremism and Child Endangerment
          Journal of Law & Family Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2, p. 391, 2010

          Abstract:
          This Article’s primary thesis is that male and female children alike are victims of child abuse and neglect in the name of FLDS [Church of Fundamental Latter-Day Saints] religious doctrine. While others have addressed “terror in the name of God” (attacking internal and external targets alike) child endangerment in the religion paradigm is, I suggest, fundamentally different. Simply put, it is the deliberate injury to one’s own child predicated on religious faith, in particular religious extremism. To that end, this Article will focus on the danger to members of an internal community (members of a particular faith) rather than to an external community (members of other faiths).

          Radical Extremists Are Spreading Disease in American Schools, Infecting Our Children
          Sound like they are talking of Muslim extremists? You would be wrong they are talking about white Christians….

          ….It’s indisputable that U.S. Authorities would bend over backward to try to prevent brown skinned Muslim extremists from sending potentially diseased children into our schools. So why the hell are they handing out “religious exemptions” for white skinned Christian extremists to do the exact same thing?

          Is it because they’re white or is it because they’re Christians?

          I believe in freedom of worship as much as the next person. Hell, I even believe in the 14th Amendment and it’s guarantee that all citizens be given that freedom of worship equally, regardless of their religious beliefs or yours….

          Most of the articles are aimed at Christians. You don’t see anything like this –
          Real abuse here in the USA:

  6. Andy DC says:

    Those inconvenient 1930’s, 1940’s and 1950’s, when it was often hotter than today! Those were followed by the inconvenient cooling trend during the 1960’s and 1970’s, while at the same time CO2 was rapidly increasing. Now we are having the inconvenient pause from 1998-2015.

    Our leading climate scientists have a lot of inconvenient decades that need to be adjusted out of existence. But it comes to data manipulation and creating their hockey stick of settled science, they are always up to the task!

  7. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    Mother nature presents to the believers at NASA and NOAA, the real climate, which she produces, and which they can not understand, why it doesn’t match what their expensive climate models say should be happening. To them Mother Nature must be wrong not their fancy models! I’d say their is little hope for them and lets hope future “real” scientists use the movement as a sample of what not to do again!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s