Gavin’s Spectacular Data Tampering In The 1990’s

Earlier today I showed Gavin’s spectacular data tampering before 1980, to create the lower half of the hockey stick.

NASANorthernLatititudes1981-1999-2015

1981 version : 1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf
1999 version : 1999_Hansen_etal_1.pdf
Current version : Fig.B.gif (407×678)

But that is only half of the hockey stick. Some of Gavin’s finest tampering is done in the 1990’s data.

Hansen 1999 showed no net warming during the 1990’s

ScreenHunter_6734 Feb. 03 21.33

pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1999/1999_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

In 2001, the GISS website also showed no net warming during the 1990’s

FiG.C.2001

NASA Goddard Institute: Surface Temperature: Graphs

But GISS now shows the 1990’s as the fastest warming decade.

PaintImage66

They built the rest of the hockey stick by simply making up data.

This image shows how the 1990’s station data has been altered since Hansen 1999.

ScreenHunter_6746 Feb. 04 05.46

The animation below shows the spectacular alterations to GISS 1990’s surface between 2001 and 2015, tripling the warming during the decade.

GISSFigA2001-2015.gif

2001 : FigA.txt
Current : Fig.A.txt

We also know that the post 2000 warming is fake, because none of the other data sets show any warming post 2000.

In summary, the entire blade of the hockey stick is a fraud, from one end to the other.

Advertisements

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

33 Responses to Gavin’s Spectacular Data Tampering In The 1990’s

  1. Dave N says:

    Amazing how far “science has progressed” (a common alarmist excuse) in less than 15 years, eh?

  2. Goodwill and trust are earned. For many years NASA truly earned goodwill, trust and admiration from the public.
    These things are not guaranteed. If the public at large believes they are being scammed that trust will be gone for a very long time.
    Keep up the good work.

    • B says:

      What few realize is that the debate on climate change (as well as other things) has actually become a debate on trusting authority. Many people are simply seeing that the experts by which rule by expert is accomplished are untrustworthy. In the end the battle lines are falling along those who still trust authority because it is all they know and those who have learned that experts have abused trust to the point that they should no longer be trusted under any circumstances.

      I’ve found it doesn’t matter how much data I show, those who trust authority cannot be swayed by data. I’ve found people simply feel, react emotionally, and when they have the option of realization they have been duped or want to continue being duped and socially acceptable, they choose the later. Or sometimes it’s simply questioning the experts of authority that they find unacceptable. I believe it makes them uncomfortable. They become rather vicious and attack along social lines. Climate change isn’t even the most vicious of these debates, that goes to vaccines.

      • Gail Combs says:

        You are correct. Once the eyes are open to the fraud in the government and MSM you start to question everything.

        As a starting point I have found the bankers to be a really good wedge. Most whether Progressive or Conservative can see the Federal Reserve Fraud. So if we can see the fraud why has Congress allowed the fraud to suck the wealth from the citizens of this country for 100 years? If Congress blesses the Fractional reserve fraud what other frauds have Congress blessed for their wealthy cronies?

        • B says:

          I agree that it is the biggest crack, but I haven’t had much luck with that beyond ‘the bankers are crooks’. People still believe in authority, believe in experts. They still believe in all the mechanisms the bankers and wall street use to steal from us are somehow necessary or people will all be starving in the streets. They still believe in everything that experts like Krugman put forth. They see the wealth and income inequality and then clamor for more of the very policies, regulations, laws, etc that caused it.

          I don’t think this can be solved until either total collapse or breaking the hold on the schools. Sadly it’s not like the movies, not like “The Running Man” (the first film) where it’s just taking over the TV signal and showing people the truth. People just wouldn’t accept the truth into their perception. It wouldn’t do any good.

        • Gail Combs says:

          B
          Until it impacts their lives and really shakes them up they rather be blind, deaf and dumb unfortunately. That is what the Elite count on. They hope to have the slave collars snapped shut before the general population wakes up.

          I just keep chipping away one person at a time. At least now I find a greater percentage of people awake compared to 2005.

        • Jason Calley says:

          @ B and Gail Combs

          Another good wedge for talking with people is the data for unemployment and inflation.

          “That global warming is starting to be a real problem!”
          “Maybe… but remember, the people who tell us that are the same people who tell us unemployment is under 6% and inflation is 2%! Me? I don’t trust them on ANYTHING!”

  3. SMS says:

    This is so obviously fraudulent; and needs to be investigated in open committees in the senate and house. It needs to be brought out in the open so that all citizens can see how criminals work and understand how we’ve all been taken to the cleaners for so many years and so many billions of dollars.

    • The biggest obstacle to getting this into Congress are a couple of prominent members of the skeptic community.

    • omanuel says:

      Fraudulent worldwide science is well documented since 1946, when

      1. George Orwell started writing his warning to the public, “Nineteen Eighty-Four”, and

      2. Sir Fred Hoyle published papers that changed mainstream opinions on the interior of the Sun
      _ a.) From mostly iron (Fe) in 1945 to
      _ b.) Mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946

      Why scientists agreed to this change without discussion or debate has not been explained.

      • omanuel says:

        Were National Academies of Science forced to sacrifice the integrity of science after WWII in order to save the world from nuclear annihilation?

        Worldwide adoption of “Better Red Than Dead” philosophy would explain why scientists in Asia, Europe, United States, South America, Africa and Russia all adopted Fred Hoyle’s 1946 change in the internal composition of the Sun without discussion or debate.

        Is there a better explanation?

    • B says:

      The experts are funded because their work empowers government. The opposition comes from a conflict of gravy chains not any fundamental issues of principle or doing science correctly. The “climate change” bandwagon has become so wide and vast, that I don’t see anyone in government doing anything to expose the scientific fraud.

      • Jason Calley says:

        The so-called “climate scientists” are primarily paid by the government to say what they say. The government will not stop the scam. They are the ones who ordered it in the first place.

        • omanuel says:

          Yes, governments do not prosecute those who follow orders.

          Which leads me to ask why USSR and later US troops were sent into the Islamic Republic of Afganastan?

          Do these super-powers cooperate to bring Muslim nations to their control?

  4. Eric Simpson says:

    I just watched the following video: How to Win Climate Change Debate Every Time. The African American presenter brings up a host of good points, but doesn’t even talk about the data manipulations going on. It was fun to watch, graphical, and I learned a number of things, and I’ll probably watch it again:

    Another solid video, at 12 minutes long, I’ll link to inline: Climate Change in 12 Minutes – The Skeptic’s Case with David Evans. The basic argument against the leftist climate loons is made very well. And we should get down pat what Dr. Evans says. It boils down to the loons say CO2 should cause 1.1° of warming and then we have 3x amplification. It turns out that amplification should be negative, arguably at 0.5x. So instead of 3.3°C of warming for a doubling of CO2 we get only about 0.55° warming, and that’s like going from 300ppm to 600ppm, only half a degree, and that would probably be washed out by the slightest natural variation. Considering that CO2 has been rising dramatically over the last 2 decades, and we’ve had virtually no warming, I’d tend to think the skeptic’s case is correct. And honestly, I’m a fan of this 4 minute video that, in looking at the ice core data, shows zero evidence of ANY effect of CO2 on temperature.

  5. Truthseeker says:

    Puck the hockey stick!

  6. omanuel says:

    This was Sri Krishna’s advice to Arjuna when Arjuna was reluctant to fight the battle of life:

    “Having made yourself alike in pain and pleasure, profit and loss, victory and defeat, engage in this great war and you will be freed from sin, Arjuna.”

  7. Latimer Alder says:

    Steve , this would be a lot more powerful if you could exactly line up the first two charts with the same scales and positions. Might be hard to do but worthwhile.

    Somehow we have to bring the climos to account for their ‘meddling’ with data.

  8. cheshirered says:

    Gavin probably has this site favoured and on his daily must-see list.
    An inquiry WILL happen one day. Not under this US administration, but one will occur . Given he’s put his work into the public domain rendering the magnitude of his adjustments undeniable, he must secretly be absolutely shitting it.

    Hi Gavin!

    • Sophie says:

      Interesting, can ‘Gavin’ now be used as a general description for anyone who is involved in trickery?
      So when confronted by someone who is trying to decieve you, now you can reply.’I don’t believe you, I think you’re havin’ a Gavin?’ Because with the data tampering, it is obvious that Gavin is havin’ a Gavin.

    • omanuel says:

      Perhaps Gavin assumes the world is under one-world communist control and he is immune from prosecution.

  9. omanuel says:

    Perhaps there is a power capable of restoring sanity to Earth:

    Having made yourself alike in pain and
    pleasure, profit and loss, victory and
    defeat, engage in this great war and
    you will be freed from sin, Arjuna.

  10. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    It’s amazing that they can get away with such blatant data tampering!

Leave a Reply to Jason Calley Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s