Women’s Liberation Arrives In London

B9QZlj9CAAAOO8z

On of my favorite pictures I took as a kid, was of a girl in a miniskirt in front of Big Ben in 1969. I don’t have the picture with me here in Maryland unfortunately.

Advertisements

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

33 Responses to Women’s Liberation Arrives In London

  1. gator69 says:

    Stockholm syndrome, or capture-bonding, is a psychological phenomenon in which hostages express empathy and sympathy and have positive feelings toward their captors, sometimes to the point of defending and identifying with the captors. These feelings are generally considered irrational in light of the danger or risk endured by the victims, who essentially mistake a lack of abuse from their captors for an act of kindness. The FBI’s Hostage Barricade Database System shows that roughly 8% of victims show evidence of Stockholm syndrome.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

  2. Sophie says:

    May I ask if you’ve ever seen Iran’s most famous film actress? I’m guessing you haven’t? Well, you’re in good company, because neither have they! Worryingly in the UK they’re allowed to drive in a burka, Though I’ve only once seen a burka wearing driver and that was one night at a supermarket, when I observed them doing a wide swerve into the carpark. It looked like someone holding on to the reins of a runaway horse.

  3. Pathway says:

    Interesting that one sign says Ban Porn, yet OBL’s computer was filled with porn and the 9/11 mass murders spent time at strip clubs.

    • annieoakley says:

      The reason the porn and alcohol/strippers etc. is ok is when one dies in Jihad all sins are forgiven by the little black rock they call allah or his stand in Moeham.

  4. Dave says:

    Its amazing how liberals won’t touch Islam, which goes completely against their supposed values of women’s and gay rights. No editorials about this in the NY Times, just worries about “Islamophobia”.

  5. philjourdan says:

    Yea, those were the days! Same mini-skirts went out of fashion. 😉

  6. Sophie says:

    I do wonder what the one on the left is saying to the one on the second left, “Psss, Ameera, what do you think, does my bomb look big in this?”

  7. Pathway says:

    The left easily gravitates toward Islam because it is a totalitarian ideology just like Marxism.

  8. au1corsair says:

    Has everybody forgotten that Communism was “the perfect form of government?” Islam isn’t just religion–Islam is a form of government, too.
    Talk about endorsing anarchy!

  9. SMS says:

    I see the Supreme Court is in session. I’m having a hard time picking out Ruth Bader Ginsberg though. I think she’s the one carrying the sign that says “Freedom go to Hell”

  10. Neal S says:

    How do we know that some or all of those covered protesters might not actually be guys?

  11. Sophie says:

    The enemy within, with a petition signed by 100,000 people against the Charlie Hebdo magazine, this is a fundamental clash off cultures. http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/02/08/2577F14B00000578-2944946-Men_and_women_were_kept_separate_during_the_protest_out_of_respe-a-24_1423433935399.jpg

    They are obviously anti free speech, does this mean they’re suffering from ‘freedom-a-phobia?

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2944946/Thousands-British-Muslims-protest-against-Charlie-Hebdo-magazine-publishing-cartoons-Prophet-Mohammed.html

  12. Adam Gallon says:

    Starting from the left, No it doesn’t, I bloody well hope not, no dear, unfortunately true, can’t argue with that one! (Especially if we’re discussing their honesty & expense accounts), rings true, funny idea of honour IMHO, maybe for women (But the men just bugger little boys and white women instead- see Rotherham gang rape scandal) & no thanks luv!

  13. oeman50 says:

    Where are the male relatives that are supposed to accompany each one of the burka-clad ladies, according to sharia law? Or maybe, as Neal has suggested, they are really guys.

    • Gail Combs says:

      The guys are the ones with the cameras. They are also the ones who made the signs and ORDERED the women to hold them.

      Do not forget that the women are little more than slaves and can be beaten or even killed in accordance with Sharia law.

      Bosch Fawstin, a former Muslim raised in America, was recently interviewed (18 min) by Jamie Glazov….

      Fawstin spoke of how he was raised in a so-called “moderate” Muslim family – a family where Hitler was greatly admired.

      Fawstin spoke of Islam’s hatred toward women and how commonplace physical abuse was in his immediate and extended family. He spoke of arranged marriages, of tears shed when babies were born who were girls, and of girls being told to expect physical violence after they are married….

      Fawstin spoke of how very few leaders speak the truth about Islam. In fact, essentially no leaders…..
      http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/11/former_muslim_sounding_the_alarm.html

      In one of the interviews Fawstin speaks of a relative pushing his wife down the stairs and the action causing no comment.

      • Neal S says:

        I think we could reduce terrorist acts, if we undertook to use pig fat as part of the lubrication of all weapons, and placed some combination of either purified pig urine, or pork rinds in various places in all public conveyances (with some of it hidden). So long as nothing bad happens to that bus or plane, nobody comes into contact with anything. Might want to dip some bullets in pigs blood too. I think there were even some commercially available rounds known as ‘Jihawgs’. Of course, if such measures are too effective, Muslim clerics will just pull out of their butts some excuse that says that martyrs get a special exemption.

  14. Gail Combs says:

    Actually use pigskin for the seats in all air lines and other public transportation and dump pig manure along the border crossings.

    http://fawstin.blogspot.com/

  15. Gail Combs says:

    Also from Bosch Fawstin creator of Pigman, Via Jihad Watch:

    Oxford University Press bans mention of pigs in books to avoid offending Muslims

    And with that, Oxford becomes less Western and more Islamic. While jihadists wage literal war on the civilized world, “Moderate” Muslims pressure Non-Islamic institutions to become more Islamic- incremental step by incremental step- and gutless Westerners are always ready to submit. This must be fought Every Step of the Way. This must be fought Every Step of the Way. Help me spread this post and its graphic wherever you can.

    • gator69 says:

      Not to be confused with ManBearPig…

    • We have the tools. Give me a few days and I can have the complete Oxford University Press offering properly sanitized:

      Once upon a time, there were three little Progressives who went off to build their houses.

      The first little Progressive built his house of straw, which was not very strong.

      One day, the big bad wolf came and said, “Little Progressive, little Progressive, let me come in.”

      “Not by the hair of my chinny chin chin,” said the first little Progressive.

      The rest will take longer. I also expect difficulties with the complete works of Shakespeare. It’s only a question of time before one of the imams hears someone speculating about Sir Francis Bacon.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s