Actually, The Temperature Adjustments Are Extremely Fraudulent

Yesterday I showed how Addison, New York January temperatures had been massively tampered with to cool the past by three degrees, and eliminate the cooling trend.

AddisonNYJan

ScreenHunter_6976 Feb. 09 05.44

Perhaps they had good reason for this, and it needed to be homogenized with a nearby station to bring it in line?

Let’s look at the next station over at Elmira, N.Y. Guess what, exactly the same data tampering – they knocked three degrees off the past temperatures and made the cooling trend disappear. The early part of the 20th century was cooled five degrees. What possible error could require five degrees of data tampering?

ElmiraNYJanScreenHunter_7042 Feb. 10 22.13

Perhaps they believe there was a massive conspiracy of global warming deniers in 1895 tampering with the temperature record? Or more likely the temperature adjustments being made today are fraudulent, and intended to turn cooling into warming.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

31 Responses to Actually, The Temperature Adjustments Are Extremely Fraudulent

  1. Bill Irk the science jerk says:

    Steven, Keep on them, I know you will. This is a clear violation of responsible data handling. The truth will prevail.

  2. Gail Combs says:

    Down Town Elmira NY

    Total Population = 29,200

    The weather station is Elmira, Elmira / Corning Regional Airport

    Location:
    http://www.airport-data.com/airport/ELM/maps.html

  3. ossqss says:

    3 degrees. And the estimated increase since 1850-60 is what currently ?

    Don’t worry, we look at eddies in the gulf stream at the pixel level to predict snow storms now.

    Imagine that?

    https://mobile.twitter.com/RyanMaue/status/565195988646649858?p=v

    The Mann says so…..

  4. ren says:

    Is Newspapers inform the public opinion?

    • Gail Combs says:

      Yes ren the newspapers help form people’s opinion.

      The nice thing is a PEW foundation poll found only 18% of the US population believed what they read in the New York Times.

  5. markstoval says:

    “Or more likely the temperature adjustments being made today are fraudulent, and intended to turn cooling into warming.”

    That is what is going on. We all know that.

    Can you imagine the changes in theory that would have to be made in climate “science” if we had honest data to work with?

  6. Steven, unless I’ve missed something, this fraud is occurring in US institutions. If I knew of such evidence against UK institutions I personally would gather the evidence together and present it to the police and demand they investigate (and also ensure that every news outlet had the evidence).

    So, why isn’t this happening?

  7. ren says:

    The Karkonosze Mountains on the Czech side went down yesterday, the highest in 30 years an avalanche.

  8. ren says:

    It can be seen that the lowest pressure in the lower stratosphere is exactly over the North magnetic pole. There also is the largest secondary galactic radiation.

  9. Steve what is the stated reasoning for these particular adjustments? Do you believe there to be any necessity for adjustments due to say, changes in instrumentation?

  10. crioux says:

    Ice Age is coming, and they prepare themsevles while making masses believe the opposite. 🙂

  11. bill hunter says:

    “Perhaps they had good reason for this, and it needed to be homogenized with a nearby station to bring it in line?”

    No worry about the authorities refusing to prosecute. . . .obviously there is no evidence of fraud.

    It would be more appropriate to say that the adjustments are unreliable due to the lack of information provided as to why the station was adjusted.

    Then that could be extended to the gridded temperature record to say that it is unreliable due to a lack of documentation due to the large number of these kinds of undocumented changes.

    One also needs to recall that the raw data that Phil “Hide the Decline Trickster” Jones dog ate that is a critical part of every surface temperature record in the world renders all the worlds long-term temperature records unreliable.

    The lack of random siting of surface temperature stations, the lack of controls to ensure they are all measuring the same thing in the same way, the lack of documentation as to why thousands of stations were excluded and a much smaller number selected, the hundreds of undocumented station adjustments we have seen, the lack of validating science to support gridding/extrapolation techniques amounts to a solid conclusion that what all the surface temperature records best represent is the “Tower of Babel”. No fraud there, just mass incompetence with a touch of mass hysteria mixed in.

    What really scares the bejeebers out of the academic community and helps perpetuate this in a growing body of science that is pointing it out is if political momentum were achieved to eliminate all science funding that mentions global warming as one of its reasons to go forward, academic science would cease to exist. That fact should scare the bejeebers out of all of us for a whole passel of reasons..

    • Gail Combs says:

      “No worry about the authorities refusing to prosecute. . . .obviously there is no evidence of fraud.”

      You are a a few years too late with that feeble defense there is plenty of evidence.

      Perhaps the two most telling graphs:

      US Temperatures Show No Correlation With CO2

      CO2 Drives NCDC Data Tampering

      “…So I tried correlating the magnitude of the tampering with the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere, and found almost perfect correlation – shown below.”

      And Steve is just one among many gathering the evidence.

    • Neal S says:

      In the US legal system, tampering with or destroying evidence is known as spoilation. Generally the evidence that has been tampered with or lost is then regarded in the worst way for the party responsible for the spoilation. This provides an incentive in the US legal system to NOT destroy evidence, even if it is somewhat adverse to ones interests.

      I think that for the AGW alarmists, the destroyed data should be treated similarly. We should assume that it was destroyed expressly because it does NOT support AGW.

      I also think the world would get along ‘just fine’ if there were no more funding for any climate research of any kind. Some people might have to get ‘real’ jobs. The worlds smallest violin (nano-scale) is too large to play the song of my pity for them.

  12. nickreality65 says:

    I seem to recall some Biblical text about honest weights and measures and bearing false witness. This temperature manipulation is similar to a butcher’s thumb resting on the scale. So if it isn’t a crime is it maybe a sin?

  13. kingbum78 says:

    Reblogged this on kingbum78's Blog and commented:
    This is just criminal…be skeptical of all surface readings these days

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s