Guardian Fiddling With Propaganda While Science Is Destroyed

Deconstructing the Guardian’s lies one at a time.

Fiddling with global warming conspiracy theories while Rome burns

The latest global warming conspiracy theory of ‘fiddling with the data’ is nonsense

Fiddling with global warming conspiracy theories while Rome burns | Dana Nuccitelli | Environment | The Guardian

Temperatures are being massively fiddled with, and turn cooling into warming. The Guardian is lying.

ScreenHunter_7083 Feb. 12 05.58

It shouldn’t need to be said, but the Earth really is warming. Air and ocean temperatures are rising fast, ice is melting across the planet, ecosystems are shifting, sea levels are rising, and so on.

Satellites show little or no warming, global sea ice is normal, sea levels have been rising for 20,000 years – and Greenland has gained a near record amount of ice mass this autumn.  The Guardian is lying.

ScreenHunter_7084 Feb. 12 06.01 Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Budget: DMI (14) (512×412)

The latest zombie climate myth to rise from the dead involves the oldest form of global warming denial. It’s a conspiracy theory that the Earth isn’t really warming; rather, fraudulent climate scientists are “fiddling” with the data to introduce a false warming trend.

That is exactly what they are doing. The Guardian is lying.

gissfiga2002-2014 (4)

In The Telegraph, which is a mostly serious UK newspaper, Christopher Booker calls scientists’ adjustments to temperature data “the biggest science scandal ever.” These accusations have echoed through conservative media and online blogs, even being aired on Fox News (three times).

Booker is correct. The Guardian is lying.

In reality climate scientists process the raw temperature data for very good reasons. Sometimes temperature monitoring station locations move. Sometimes the time of day at which they’re read changes. Sometimes changes are made to the instruments themselves. In each case, if adjustments aren’t made, then biases will be included in the data that don’t reflect actual changes in temperatures.

The fact that they can provide theoretical justifications for the general concept of data tampering, tells us absolutely nothing about the correctness of what they are actually doing. The actual adjustments could be 100% fraudulent. Governments generate fake data all the time. People write incorrect software all the time. The adjustments should be cooling the present due to UHI, and reducing the trend – not increasing it.

images (3)

Richard Muller at UC Berkeley was skeptical that climate scientists were doing all these adjustments correctly, so he assembled the Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature (BEST) team to check the data for themselves. The biggest initial financial contribution to the project came from the Koch brothers.

Muller is skeptical of nothing. He has always been a flaming alarmist who wanted to prove the hockey stick was real.

By Richard Muller on December 17, 2003

Let me be clear. My own reading of the literature and study of paleoclimate suggests strongly that carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history. It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate. I would love to believe that the results of Mann et al. are correct, and that the last few years have been the warmest in a millennium.

Medieval Global Warming – Page 2 | MIT Technology Review


“It is ironic if some people treat me as a traitor, since I was never a skeptic”

Richard Muller, Climate Researcher, Navigates The Volatile Line Between Science And Skepticism

As Muller discusses in the video below, his team confirmed that the Earth’s surface temperatures are warming. In fact, BEST finds that NASA, NOAA, and the UK Met Office have slightly underestimated the warming over the past 15 years.

Utter bullshit. There has been no warming for the past 15 years over land, but Best shows a huge amount of warming. The Guardian is lying.

ScreenHunter_7081 Feb. 12 05.48

As always, no one will make any attempt to debate me on this issue. They will just launch more personal attacks like they always do. They know that they would lose an honest debate.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to Guardian Fiddling With Propaganda While Science Is Destroyed

  1. nigelf says:

    Lying about their lies, it’s what leftists do. And most scientists are on the left so it fits the mold perfectly.
    I predict you and others exposing this will be called liars by the liars for exposing their lies once again, which will make them liars for the third time on this subject.

    • Andy Oz says:

      I love James Woods recent twitter quote:
      “Scratch a leftist and you’ll find a fascist underneath.”
      Or Hitler’s quote
      “If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed”.

      The Guardian has zero integrity, the same as the SMH in Oz.
      Keep up the great work Tony H !

  2. roaldjlarsen says:

    Personal attacks is what you get when you are right about the science. In a way, they are actually confirming your findings, but they are too stupid to get that.

    • Gail Combs says:

      That and the fact they refuse to debate skeptics. Instead they come on skeptic blogs and unload their BS, non sequiturs and propaganda. If you call it like it is they will erupt spewing bile all over the place.

      I just had fun yanking Perlwitz chain by telling him I wanted to see him in court on charges of fraud and “Do you think we can get Accomplice before the fact on murder charges for all those poor people that died of fuel starvation in the UK and elsewhere? Climate Nuremburg trials? HUMMMmmm”

      You can watch him explode:

      One of his responses: “Now, you are some hater, aren’t you?

      I can classify your writings as nothing else than as utterly delusional….

      Leveling these accusations against me without any evidence makes you exactly the hater that you are.

      I suspect that you prefer a form of state/government where people are thrown into prison without any evidence that they have committed a crime.”

      Seems Perlwitz forgot that truth or what you believe is the truth is an absolute defense.

      • emsnews says:

        They really want us dead.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Yes they do. Ted Turner very bluntly stated:
          ”A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”

          Ex-senator Wirth who colluded with Hansen to scam Congress into believing in CAGW now is president of Turner’s United Nations foundation.

          It really is a small well connected group and they want us dead or in serf’s collars.

  3. cheshirered says:

    That they’ve chosen Dana to address this issue says it all; he’s their head of hysterical climate propaganda (there’s tough competition, mind) and nothing but nothing EVER goes against his beloved theory.
    The Guardian is an integral part of the Green Blob so there’s NO way they’ll do anything other than continue to perpetuate their green BS, and that includes defending their climate propaganda in an open court.

  4. gator69 says:

    When ‘adjustments’ cancel out the heat of the 1930’s and 1940’s, they are no longer ‘adjustments’, they are acts of fraud.

    When ‘adjustments’ do not counter UHI, but instead spread it across rural areas, they are no longer ‘adjustments’, they are acts of fraud.

    • Jason Calley says:


      I am all for giving people the benefit of a doubt, but when a consistent and long term pattern of self-serving misdeeds is evident, any unbiased person must at least consider that fraud is being committed.

  5. Neal S says:

    I am guessing that Gavin and GISS have never publicly shared the code that they use to make their ‘adjustments’ to the temperature record. I am also guessing that if that code ever became public, that a careful analysis would prove just how fraudulent their adjustments are.

    What possible valid scientific reason could there be for surgically adjusting down temperatures in the 30’s and 40’s and not so much those immediately before, or just after? (crickets either freeze or chirp)

  6. Neal S says:

    One of the comments on the guardian article was “Another reason the accussations (sic) by the deniers fall apart if that none of the national meteorological organisatyions (sic) comer (sic) out and complain that their data has been tampered with, that their analysis of their own data shows otherwise etc.” . But I seem to recall that there was at least one if not two cases where national meteorological organizations did actually complain.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Oh yes they did complain. Iceland did (See Paul Homewood – link )

      And so did Russia at the time of Climategate e-mails in 2009.
      a href=””>Russian paper

      News Article: December 16, 2009 Russians accuse Hadley Centre of falsifying Russian temperatures

      The mystery of the accusations of Russian involvement in the Climategate scandal suddenly deepened yesterday, when a key Russian ministry accused the UK Met Office Hadley Centre, closely partnered with the East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU), of misreporting Russian weather-station data in order to allege warming trends that, the Russians now say, their data do not support.

      According to an article in Kommersant, reproduced here at RIA Novosti (and quoted here at The Air Vent), the Institute for Economic Analysis (IEA), in Moscow, issued a report Tuesday alleging that the Hadley Centre, when compiling its contribution to the Hadley-CRU Temperature (HadCRUT) surveys, used data from a select 25% of Russian weather stations.

      The problem: the remaining stations, covering 40% of Russian territory, have shown no substantial warming in recent decades. Furthermore, the stations selected mostly include those with incomplete datasets….

  7. philjourdan says:

    It is Dana. Which means there is no truth on it.

  8. Hell_Is_Like_Newark says:

    Does anyone here expect a small, downward ‘blip’ in the satellite sea level due to the amount of snow we are getting in the Northern Hemisphere?

  9. Gail Combs says:

    Speaking of the groiniad one commenter at Delingpole’s Green scientists caught tampering with the historical record. Again article had this to say:

    SuffolkBoy > colliemum • 4 hours ago

    The Guardian commenters fantasize over beheading and tattooing their opponents rather than the Gulag and greenbrushing. In response to a suggestion to just ignore them, one wrote: “Don’t ignore them, just behead the big players and just tattoo the hangers-on.”
    Another is fantasizing over software that automatically detects and removes denier comments from blogs.


    And Pearlwitless wonders why I show a few teeth…

    • Dave N says:

      “Another is fantasizing over software that automatically detects and removes denier comments from blogs.”

      Nice display of cluelessness by whomever said that.

      • Gail Combs says:

        Given the amount of censoring I have run into at this site (By WordPress) I can see where he might think it can be done.

  10. UnderminingOrthodoxy says:

    Hi folks. Just dropped by from the Grauniad to burst your bubble. Have any of you “sceptics” actually checked on Steve’s claim re Greenland? “and Greenland has gained a near record amount of ice mass this autumn. The Guardian is lying.”
    If you follow his link to the source and read the text, you will find that the Surface Mass Balance does not tell the whole story, it only accounts for the difference between precipitation and surface melt. They go on to say :
    “Over the year, it snows more than it melts, but calving of icebergs also adds to the total mass budget of the ice sheet. Satellite observations over the last decade show that the ice sheet is not in balance. The calving loss is greater than the gain from surface mass balance, and Greenland is losing mass at about 200 Gt/yr.”
    Got that? Greenland is not gaining mass, it is losing 200Gt/year
    Goddard is lying

  11. Truthseeker says:

    “Deconstructing the Guardian’s lies one at a time.”

    At the rate they produce lies, that means we are going backwards at an alarming rate.

  12. Miles says:

    If the majority climate scientists are right and we do nothing about it, we have a pretty huge catastrophe on our hands.

    If we do something about it and the climate predictions are wrong, we will have encouraged new industries to grow to produce clean and renewable energy, clean air, and generally make the world a better place, all for nothing.

    That is a conspiracy I’m happy to live with.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s