Proof Of Collusion

Government agencies produce graphs like these of “independent temperature analysis”


These graphs don’t even vaguely match their own previously published data. The only way they could have ended up so similar is by collusion. Claims of independence are bullshit. Phil Jones admitted that they don’t have any reliable historical SST data over huge swaths of ocean.

gissfiga2002-2014 (4) ScreenHunter_7025 Feb. 10 11.00 ScreenHunter_7026 Feb. 10 12.08

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

31 Responses to Proof Of Collusion

  1. myrightpenguin says:

    On the same overall theme of fudging through revisionism.

    I have this fudging of the multidecadal oscillation (and cooling 1940-1970) down as a parallel to the fudging of the MWP/LIA. It’s all an effort to alter the data to try to fit the hockey schtick of course.

    • omanuel says:

      There is little if any doubt worldwide collusion was involved in the 1945 decision to hide neutron repulsion as the source of energy that destroyed Hiroshima with:

      1. False claims of an attractive, rather than repulsive nuclear force between neutrons in the cores of heavy atoms

      2. False claims interstellar clouds of hydrogen collapse to form stars when neutron-repulsion actually induces stars to emit neutrons, that decay in fifteen minutes into hydrogen atoms which are discarded to interstellar space by the stellar (solar) wind

      3. False claims an imaginary Big Bang made the primordial universe and filled it with hydrogen at time, t = 0.

      Thanks to the Climategate debate, lines of battle are now being drawn with world tyrants and “scientists” that adjust observations and experimental data and on the same losing side.

      • myrightpenguin says:

        I hope you are right but when I see Brussels commit 20% of their budget to “climate change action” [1] so many years after Climategate with the public hardly aware of the extent they are being robbed by the thieves’ cartel (landowners, wind/solar subsidy farmers, Siemens and other Agenda 21 multinational ‘sponsors’, Goldman Sachs, bureaucrats with snouts in the trough, etc., etc.) it does very much still feel like a battle against the odds facing the threat of a ‘borg’. One can only hope the EU will implode as soon as possible as the extent of scamming is just being hidden by kicking the can down the road with things such as quantitative easing. I’m mentioning all of this because some people are over-focusing on the “scientists” while underestimating the beast as a whole.

        This revitalised line of attack via. ‘Steven’ and Paul Homewood has been a positive development for sure though. It’s also made it very clear to me why realists have not made as much progress as we could have over the last couple of years due to WUWT allowing itself to become too comfortable within a status quo.

        The politicians clearly have their get-out already lined up [2], so basically they don’t care.


  2. gator69 says:

    Or proof that ignorance/denial of UHI is global.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Remeber Gavin Schmidt is English.
      Education BA (Oxon); PhD (London), both in mathematics
      Alma mater: Jesus College, Oxford University College London.

      Australia, the UK and the USA trade ClimAstrologists on such a frequent basis you get whiplash.

      Another example: Robert Watson, University of East Anglia (From WIKI)

      Watson was the Director of the Science Division and Chief Scientist for the Office of Mission to Planet Earth at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Watson then became Associate Director for Environment in the Office of the President of the United States in the White House.

      In 1996, Watson joined the World Bank as Senior Scientific adviser… is currently the Chief Scientist and Senior Adviser for Sustainable Development. He took up a position as Chair of Environmental Science and Science Director of the Tyndall Centre at the University of East Anglia, United Kingdom, in August 2007[5] and joined the British Government’s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) as Chief Scientific Adviser in September 2007.[6]…
      He was Chairman of the Global Environment Facility’s Scientific and Technical Advisory Panel from 1991 to 1994, Chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) from 1997 to 2002 and Board co-chair for the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment from 2000 to 2005. He is currently Director of the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology for Development and co-chair of the International Scientific Assessment of Stratospheric Ozone. He has been Chair or co-chair of other international scientific assessments, including the IPCC Working Group II, the United Nations Environment Programme/World Meteorological Organization (UNEP/WMO), and the UNEP Global Biodiversity Assessment.Professor of Environmental Sciences; Director of Strategic Development, Tyndall at the University of East Anglia,


      Prior to joining OSTP, Dr. Watson was Director of the Science Division and Chief Scientist for the Office of Mission to Planet Earth at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. From 1990-93, Dr. Watson served as Director of the Process Studies Program Office in NASA’s Earth Science and Applications Division, previously serving (from 1987-90) as Branch Chief for Upper Atmospheric Research and Tropospheric Chemistry Programs. He served as a NASA Acting Program Scientist from 1980-87. In addition, Dr. Watson served as a scientist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California from 1976-87….

  3. richard says:

    Sorry Steve , wrong place for this but as the MSM did not pick up on it , perhaps you have already seen it. Came off Facebook.

    It is outstanding.

    “You’re a 19 year old kid.
    You are critically wounded and dying in the jungle somewhere in the Central Highlands of Viet Nam.
    It’s November 11, 1967.
    LZ (landing zone) X-ray.
    Your unit is outnumbered 8-1 and the enemy fire is so intense from 100 yards away, that your CO (commanding officer) has ordered the MedEvac helicopters to stop coming in.
    You’re lying there, listening to the enemy machine guns and you know you’re not getting out.
    Your family is half way around the world, 12,000 miles away,
    and you’ll never see them again.
    As the world starts to fade in and out, you know this is the day.
    Then – over the machine gun noise – you faintly hear that sound of a helicopter.
    You look up to see a Huey coming in. But.. It doesn’t seem real because no MedEvac markings are on it.
    Captain Ed Freeman is coming in for you.
    He’s not MedEvac so it’s not his job, but he heard the radio call and decided he’s flying his Huey down into the machine gun fire anyway.
    Even after the MedEvacs were ordered not to come. He’s coming anyway.
    And he drops it in and sits there in the machine gun fire, as they load 3 of you at a time on board.
    Then he flies you up and out through the gunfire to the doctors and nurses and safety.
    And, he kept coming back!!
    13 more times!!
    Until all the wounded were out. No one knew until the mission was over that the Captain had been hit 4 times in the legs and left arm.
    He took 29 of you and your buddies out that day. Some would not have made it without the Captain and his Huey.
    Medal of Honor Recipient, Captain Ed Freeman, United States Air Force, died last Wednesday at the age of 70, inBoise, Idaho
    May God Bless and Rest His Soul.
    I bet you didn’t hear about this hero’s passing, but we’ve sure seen a whole bunch about the thug Michael Brown, Trayvon Martin,
    and the bickering of congress over Health & OBAMA CARE!
    Medal of Honor Winner Captain Ed Freeman
    Shame on the media !!!
    Now… YOU pass this along.
    Honor this real hero”

  4. ren says:

    Temperatures falling in the northern states. Frost comes to Florida.

  5. ren says:

    At the beginning of next week, temperatures in the Northeast falls below -30 degrees C. Now it’s snowing again in Boston.

  6. tsuhtt1 says:

    Just thought you might be interested in knowing I just got blocked by Lobos Motl The Reference Frame from posting the below

    At this point it looks like a he said she said argument. You contend adjustments made to the raw data are made without bias with little or no facts to support it. Steve Goddard says the raw data is adjusted with extreme bias to cool the past and warm the present for the purpose of helping to shore up the anthropogenic global warming theory. Looking at both sides It appears to me that the facts support Steve Goddard side that temperature data was and is being adjusted with extreme bias.

    The other factor that supports Steve Goddard is the motivation by the government advocates of anthropogenic global warming to adjust the records with bias is enormous. Billions of tax payer dollars are being “invested” in green energy, government can roll in tons of money via carbon taxes, the Saudis can continue their monopoly on oil resources, etc etc etc.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Lobos is in no mood to hear reason.

      I hit him with a modified version of these comments starting HERE, that also show independent support for Steve Goddard’s argument that the adjustments are not valid. He refused to post the comments.

      I get the feeling Lobos got hit with a lot of other information that also show the adjustments are not valid since several people have been working on the subject for years.

      Lobos shot from the hip based on what Zeke and Mosher said and their claim Anthony Watts agreed. He then got smacked down and does not like it so he closed the thread took his marbles and went home.

      • richard says:

        with the speed of the internet all these stories quickly do the rounds and they end up looking really childish.

        • richard says:

          I get the sense, following comments on MSM stories, that the general public is waking up quickly to the fraud.

          The Booker telegraph article on temps has hit 27,000 comments. Their poll has hit 123,000 with 87% agreeing that there has been fraud.

        • myrightpenguin says:

          87% of people voting in that Daily Telegraph poll say that it is a fraud? Will the DT get rid of Geoffrey Lean then? lol.

        • emsnews says:

          Wait, shouldn’t it be 92% believe it is fraud? 🙂 We have a consensus!

  7. ren says:

    Does anyone know the current volume of ice in the Arctic?

  8. I got banned from desmugblog – I think it was after I said “are you suggesting that if I am aware of fraud that I should not report it to the police”?

  9. ren says:

    According to Senior Meteorologist Henry Margusity, “The storm could bring life-threatening conditions, especially in New England with very low temperatures and strong winds combining with snow to bring blizzard conditions.”

    • emsnews says:

      ARRGH…I am seriously running out of places to snow plow the snow on my mountain. When the first storm hit, I pushed the snow as far off as possible expecting this to be a very brutal winter but now it has piled up higher and higher, higher than my snow plow vehicle.

      This is so annoying…I did tell the global warmist group I refuse to snow plow them out anymore. They get to do it by hand and save the planet from heating this way. No more CO2 snow plowing for them! My truck stays home.

  10. Robert B says:

    I find it strange that there is no obvious correlation with the Sun’s activity. At least not until after 2000

    • myrightpenguin says:

      Correlation with solar activity is long term (e.g. Minoan, Roman, Medieval, current warm periods, as well as Milankovitch on an even longer timescale). Once you get to multidecadal scale other drivers become more apparent in the ‘noise’ such as AMO/PDO, ENSO, volcanic activity, etc., etc., a bit like the transition from climate to chaotic weather with ultra-short timescales.

      I’m not convinced TSI tells the whole story either with sunspot activity / Svensmark to be also considered for example (which has kind of gone into the background with this scientific area for now, awaiting further breakthroughs).

      I do also have a suspicion that airborne aerosolised particulates (SOx, NOx) have played some role, which has to factor in scrubber technology advances in the West (cleaner air, less albedo) but at the same time expansion of coal fired plant capacity with China/India.

      • Robert B says:

        I put it up as I was concerned about even the satellite data. I don’t know why there seems to be a correlation before 2000 with the derivative. Maybe there is a delay or the change causes the changes in circulation (more meridonal than zonal jet streams? Leads to transfer of heat as latent heat from tropics to polar regions high in the atmosphere?) The problem is we might never know because even the satellite data is probably corrupted. We can’t look at it scientifically.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s