Huge Scandal – Just Not That One

Paul Homewood noted on his blog that NCDC has lowered global temperatures by several degrees since their 1997 version. There is a scandal here, but it isn’t necessarily that they lowered the temperature.

ScreenHunter_04 Feb. 23 07.24

ScreenHunter_02 Feb. 23 07.23

The problems are that as of 1997 they didn’t even pretend to have accurate long term records of sea surface temperatures, and that they have tampered with Southern Hemisphere temperatures.

The graph below shows how fake the Southern Hemisphere temperature data is. As of 1978 NOAA showed the Southern Hemisphere extra tropics surface temperatures cooling from 1958 to 1977

ScreenHunter_456 Mar. 12 08.47

PaintImage28

journals.ametsoc.org/doi/pdf/10.1175/1520-0493(1978)106<0755%3AGTVSMA>2.0.CO%3B2

GISS now shows the same period warming in that region.

ScreenHunter_7387 Feb. 23 11.58

data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/tabledata_v3/ZonAnn.Ts.txt

They accomplished this by massively tampering with data in places like South America, turning cooling into warming. Paul uncovered the damage NCDC and GISS were doing in South America.

PuertoCasado

GISS didn’t even start publishing pre-1950 land/ocean temperatures until about 2003, because they knew the data was inadequate. Now they mix in fake ocean data and tampered surface data, to make a 100% fraudulent temperature record.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Huge Scandal – Just Not That One

  1. A C Osborn says:

    Anybody else in Science would be strongly questioning an Organisation that openly admits it has got the temperatures wrong by 4.2 F in 1997, it smacks of severe incompetence, but no-one questioned them at the time.
    They have totally revised just about every form of temperature data available.

    • The 4.2 difference is due to using ocean temperatures in one version, but not the other. It is not an apples to apples comparison.

      • A C Osborn says:

        I suggest that you read it again, the 1997 data specifically says
        “The chart reflects variations from the 30-year average (1961-1990) of the combined land and sea surface temperatures.”
        So they had to reduce one or both by over 4.2 degrees F for 1997 and 4.5 degrees F for 1998.
        However the 1997 summary does not show the individual sea & land data, that comes in the 1998 version.

  2. g2-9ed9acc685824c6663c51c5b093476cc says:

    Good. Lord. It ain’t the science that’s “settled,” it’s the conspiracy.

  3. emsnews says:

    Alice is Weather Wonderland! 🙂

  4. gator69 says:

    Secretary of State John Kerry continued to beat the drum on the dangers of climate change Friday, noting that “there is no Planet B.” The secretary made the remarks at the swearing-in ceremony for Ambassador-at-Large for Religious Freedom David Saperstein. He drew a religious connection to the issue of climate change, saying that “when it comes to the fundamental health of Earth, folks, we’d better stick to the Creator’s original plan.”

    Hey John! There is a ‘Planet B’, and it has a creator with a plan, but it doesn’t need saving. And BTW, Planet A is also doing fine, except for you lunatics.

  5. Hugh K says:

    This ongoing fraudulent behavior could be interpreted as a violation of RICO.
    It would be very interesting to pursue in the courts. But then, we would need a US Attorney General willing to place his/her job above partisan politics. Never mind…

  6. omanuel says:

    You and Paul Homewood “pulled the curtain on the modern Wizard of Oz”: The Unholy, 1945 Alliance of World Leaders with Greedy-Scientist-for-Hire.

    The AGW fable was but one of many worldwide falsehoods resulting from a 1945 decision to forbid public knowledge of the energy in cores of heavy atoms, some planets, stars and galaxies – NEUTRON REPULSION – with unfounded claims:

    1. Science Disproves Religion
    2. A Standard Nuclear Model
    3. A Standard Climate Model
    4. A Standard Solar Model &
    5. Big Bang Cosmology . . .

    Click to access Solar_Energy_For_Review.pdf

    Conclusion: The AGW debate ended quietly behind closed doors of badly-shaken world leaders after you two reported and confirmed data tampering. Science and spirituality can now merge into beneficial ways of knowing reality if world leaders and leaders of the scientific community accept that the Sun made and sustains every atom, life and world in the solar system, including the climate of each planet, the vibrations of each atom, and the heart-beat of every life, including those of politicians and scientists !

  7. Eliza says:

    They are getting quite desperate (probably because there will be an Senate/Congress investigation into the adjustments). Im guessing they may be using BEST as a front to represent them (GISS, NOAA, Ect). JC has allowed Zeke again to post a justification for TOBS.Just do a one liner posting LOL

  8. Eliza says:

    Re paraguay Puerto casado was only one! Unfortunately they did that to ALL the stations here LOLWhat a bunch of Cretinos!

  9. omanuel says:

    Tony, you and Paul learned in a few months what I would not admit for over forty-nine years (1960-2009):World leaders and puppet scientists formed an unholy alliance that rules the world exactly as George Orwell predicted in a book he started writing in 1946, “Nineteen Eighty-Four”.

  10. omanuel says:

    Good News/Bad News

    Good News: Tony and Paul are talented and brave, on the side of truth and justice in a battle they will definitely win – eventually.

    Bad News: Stalin and his allies had a seventy-year head start, energized by greed and delusions of control over the entire world. They are out of contact with reality and will definitely lose the battle – eventually.

  11. To Tony and Paul. You both deserve to receive Obama’s and Gore’s Nobel Prize

  12. omanuel says:

    Will The Internet Survive?

    Is the entire future of the internet now at risk, as Tom Fernandez suggests?

    http://tomfernandez28.com/2015/02/24/future-of-entire-internet-at-stake/

  13. chili palmer says:

    NY Times 1981 front page carried Hansen group explanation for global warming in the midst of apparent global cooling: “Their conclusion that the climate has warmed by almost one degree in the last century is based on a re-analysis of global observations, paying special attention to the Southern Hemisphere. ”The common misconception that the world is cooling,” they say, ”is based on Northern Hemisphere experience to 1970.”” 8/22/1981, “STUDY FINDS WARMING TREND THAT COULD RAISE SEA LEVELS,” NY Times, Walter Sullivan

  14. gator69 says:

    Speaking of scandals…

    Pachauri quits U.N. climate panel after sexual harassment complaint

    (Reuters) – India’s Rajendra Pachauri stepped down as chair of the U.N. panel of climate scientists on Tuesday, ending 13 turbulent years in charge after allegations of sexual harassment, which he has denied.

    Pachauri, aged 74 and chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) since 2002, pulled out of an IPCC meeting in Kenya this week after Indian police started an investigation into a sexual harassment complaint against him.

    Maybe Gore or Biden can step in now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s