NCDC Hits New Milestones Of Fake Data

So far this year, more than 50% of USHCN data is fake, and NCDC is adjusting US temperatures upwards by more than one degree. New records for both.

ScreenHunter_7446 Feb. 26 08.05

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5/ushcn.tavg.latest.FLs.52i.tar.gz

ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ushcn/v2.5/ushcn.tavg.latest.raw.tar.gz

Monthly temperatures which are marked with an “E” are “estimated” rather than measured. More than half of the current data for 2015 is fake.

ScreenHunter_7444 Feb. 26 07.59

As more data comes in, these numbers will go down some, but the point is that the more data is missing, the higher the temperature. This is likely due to to loss of rural data, and infilling with UHI contaminated urban data.

Zeke and Mosher say this is all good.

Advertisements

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to NCDC Hits New Milestones Of Fake Data

  1. Reblogged this on The Grey Enigma and commented:
    .
    Got science?

  2. gator69 says:

    What is their hurry? Why not wait for the real data? Oh, silly me I forgot, they don’t even use real data when it is available.

  3. Edmonton Al says:

    Is anyone notifying Sen. Inhofe? Isn’t he supposed to be investigating this problem?

  4. Jason Calley says:

    The match between the two charts — divergence between final and raw, and percentage of estimated data — is so close that I cannot see how anyone can question the correlation. The more fake data, the greater the divergence. How can anyone not see this?!

    The fact that both those charts also have a linear correlation with the amount of CO2 in the air is clear evidence (if not proof beyond a reasonable doubt) that the fakery is being done on purpose and is not just a computer algorithm error.

  5. rogue says:

    How does this evolve over time? How many estimated stations for 2010 as reported in 2011, 2012, 2013 etc

  6. Eliza says:

    This is amazing! Is this usual? (every winter) we may be truly entering an ice age. The AGw deserves this I hope they all freeze in hell LOL
    http://iceagenow.info/2015/02/york-city-surrounded-ice-floes-short-video/

    • rah says:

      Eliza, as much as despise the deception and the scammers that fund and perpetrate it. I can’t wish for a new round of major glaciation. Such a thing would be damned hard on the human species and many others.

  7. emsnews says:

    What a hockey stick!

    At this rate, by 2020, there will be only one thermometer station left. Bet it will be in LA at the airport there. 😦

  8. A C Osborn says:

    I looked at some data last year and it was the same then, I went back to the Raw and the Real data was there, but not used. But just as bad is the Estimated data is used wholesale instead of historical Raw data and is also used where there is NO DATA.
    The excuse for this is to maintian the 1200 odd stations required for USHCN with long timelines, so they use stations with shorter timelines and infill them.
    They do not make all the station’s past cooler some actually make very cold records warmer, so that the Trend is Straightened out to better fit The Hockey Stick, The CO2 Trend and to make it easier for the GCM’s to fit to. ie get rid of the warm 30/40s and cold early 1900s & 70s.
    The next question is Do the USHCN RAW data or ADJUSTED data get used as GHCN/GISS Raw data?

  9. jmrSudbury says:

    It must have been too cold to read/fix the rural stations I guess. — John M Reynolds

  10. D. Self says:

    A sign of desperation. The Cold winter is hurting their cause to convince Americans that they need to be taxed into poverty.

  11. E Martin says:

    Pl put the name of the perps responsible on each chart showing their “adjustments” and “filll-ins” etc.

  12. AndyG55 says:

    The really remarkable thing is that despite all these missing temperatures, they are still able to match USCRN almost exactly.

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/national-temperature-index/time-series?datasets%5B%5D=uscrn&datasets%5B%5D=cmbushcn&parameter=anom-tmin&time_scale=p12&begyear=2005&endyear=2015&month=12

    Two totally different networks (3 if you include ClimDiv), and they all match almost exactly.

    Someone is doing some major fudging of data !!!

    And its COOLING by about 0.5F per decade.

Leave a Reply to Jason Calley Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s