Climate Alarmists Hate The Planet

Climate alarmists have hijacked and destroyed the environmental movement. But they have taken it a step further and now they say that clean air threatens the climate.

ScreenHunter_7666 Mar. 03 09.11

China’s War on Air Pollution May Cause More Global Warming – Scientific American

ScreenHunter_7667 Mar. 03 09.17


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

23 Responses to Climate Alarmists Hate The Planet

  1. Dan W. says:

    You might want to get a screen capture of the (un)scientific-american website. Front page article proclaims: “Climate Change Hastened Syria’s Civil War”

    • omanuel says:

      The AGW debate is over. The worldwide propaganda machine has been exposed after seventy years (1945-2015) of successful operation.

      The greatest danger now is some desperate action by world tyrants to retain power:

      1. Inciting racial, religious or ethnic violence
      2. Genuine or “false flag” wars

    • Anthony Scalzi says:

      Seth has a version of that article on the AP too.

  2. Gail Combs says:

    Look at all the effort International Corporations went to to clean up the air where they LIVE (USA, EU) and export the dirty industry they get rich off of to China where there are few pollution laws and cheap serf labor to maximize profit.

    Look at all the bribes that had to be paid to politicians!

    And now the Chinese want to scuttle their plans?


    Hustle out the tame ClimAstrologists and their propaganda rags to fight the idea.

  3. SxyxS says:

    Does anything exists that does not cause global warming these days?(except propagating&fighting global warming)

  4. Edmonton Al says:

    Scientific American is desperate for readership and will now print anything controversial..
    They are on a slow downhill path to receivership….IMO

  5. Joseph says:

    Why do progressives have to compare everything to war? (i.e. war on drugs, war on climate change, etc.)

    • Gail Combs says:

      It is not just comparing war to everything it is using a specific term LEGAL TERM ‘war’ for a specific legal reason having to do with the Constitutional rights of citizens during peace time and during war time.

      This is why a president will “Declare a war on…”

    • Edmonton Al says:

      Because they are mentally insecure, and blame normal [whatever that is] people for everything. It is ALWAYS someone else who is to blame for whatever they think is wrong.
      They also, accuse normal people of all the very same things that they are guilty of. IMO.
      We have to fight those _______________ [fill in your choice]. It’s war.

      • Disillusioned says:

        “They also, accuse normal people of all the very same things that they are guilty of. IMO.”

        • Gail Combs says:

          That is typical of thieves and progressives. Accuse your victim of your actions before they can level an accusation against you. It is the best defense of immoral/criminal behavior there is.

    • Tel says:

      War allows them to justify extraordinary government powers… which is the actual point of the whole exercise.

      As soon as you create a limited government, the bureaucracy starts thinking of ways to sneak around those limitations. Which US President sat three terms?

  6. B says:

    They are not idiots. This is a political and economic agenda to impoverish and control people. They have never really cared about the environment, they use our desire to protect the environment as a political weapon to advance an agenda that serves their careers. We have to stop acting like these people are incompetent idiots. They are not. They advance this agenda because it benefits them, empowers them, and/or brings about the sort of society they want. They use their authority and the fact that most of the people have been deliberately miseducated by a school system that is driven by the same aims to mislead and manipulate people to go along with it all.

    And before someone says “conspiracy theory”, there is no conspiracy in that sense. The people at the top of wealth and political pyramid set the agenda through funding it and hence the behaviors that are rewarded. The rest falls into place on its own. Take a 100 “scientists” and show them they can have a nice rewarding career advancing a certain political and economic agenda or they can struggle career wise their entire life in the name of scientific truth. My rough guess is about 97% will advance the agenda. And that’s not because of the debunked consensus number, it’s because generally speaking people who don’t go along to get along, who are able to go against social pressures, are about 3-5% of a population it seems from what I’ve learned. Not that a lot more people know the truth, they just won’t take the risks socially and economically.

  7. Climate alarmists hate people and they hate themselves.

  8. DD More says:

    How does Scientific American classify smoldering and burning bird feathers. Seems like the new concentrated solar energy plants really are smokin’

    • gofer says:

      From WUWT Comments, shows the insanity of the bird advocates:

      “Call the Audubon Society if you’re curious. I did. They told me the birds will die anyway. Because of Global Warming. So what’s a few dead birds to save the whole planet.?”

  9. Dave1billion says:


    Given a choice between high levels of sulfur/particulates/ozone vs a slight increase in CO2 I’d have to go for the latter.

    The people who think this is a bad deal obviously don’t have to wear face masks as they bicycle to work.

    Leave it to the CAGW crowd to denigrate something that has an ACTUAL POSITIVE IMPACT on health and the environment.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s