Friday The Thirteenth Premier In DC!

A new scary Friday the 13th movie is premiering in DC tomorrow, only this time the whole planet is doomed.

ScreenHunter_7870 Mar. 12 19.26

ScreenHunter_7868 Mar. 12 19.25

Advertisements

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

72 Responses to Friday The Thirteenth Premier In DC!

  1. gator69 says:

    Merchants of Doubt = Truth in advertising.

    • Barbara says:

      The “Merchants” I recommend is Robert Zubrin’ s book Merchants of Despair. Subtitle is Radical Environmentalists, Criminal Pseudo-Scientists, and the Fatal Cult of Antihumanism. 45 pages of bibliography: well referenced, and one of the saddest books I have ever read.

  2. Hope says:

    Ohhh yea .. no ad hom here .. no DOUBT y’all fear the TRUTH the film covers.

    (maybe it’s the doom of your sowing doubt career you sense)

    • Tomorrow is Friday the 13th, dear. These things seem to fly right over your head. I’m looking forward to meeting the people behind this scam tomorrow.

      • Hope says:

        What does NOT fly over your head .. but what you do on purpose ..

        … is take that fact – add a Freddy Kugar wallpaper and a little bombast frosting; “only this time the whole planet is doomed” and make a nice little attack piece ..

        … as you complain to me in emails that the left alone does this.

        Doesn’t bother you that Singer simply sold doubt about tobacco danger in his last gig .. and now just does the same for climate?

        • Fred is a great guy. Intelligent and honest. Unlike your friends.

        • BruceC says:

          Hopeless is that stupid she thinks Freddy Krueger (correct spelling) was in the Friday the 13th movies.

          Hopeless dear, Freddy Krueger was in the Nightmare on Elm Street movies….Jason was in Friday the 13th.

          But you knew that didn’t you Hopeless, because those of us who have been trained by the fossil fuel industry are too stupid and dumb and know absolutely nothing.

        • BruceC says:

          BTW Hopeless, did you know that both Al Gore’s – Alliance for Climate Protection and the David Suzuki Foundation have received grants from The Rockefeller Brothers Fund (totaling ~$435,000), meanwhile…..

          The Heartland Institute
          The Cato Institute
          The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF)
          Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT)

          = $0.00

      • bleakhouses says:

        The irony is that Hope doesn’t care to understand the referenced film is itself an ad hominem attack.

    • gator69 says:

      Hope’s theme song.

      • Hope says:

        What I love is well all this plays in this little world … out in the grown up world this sort of thing just discredits you .. as it should.

        • Hope says:

          What I love is HOW well all this plays in this little world … out in the grown up world this sort of thing just discredits you .. as it should.

        • gator69 says:

          What I love is how you run away from this very simple question

          Did Judge Loftin lie when he signed this legal document…

          The court, having reviewed the law and evidence as well as motions, briefs and arguments of the counsel of this case denies plaintiffs section 27 Anti-Slapp motion to dismiss Range’s counter claims. The court references with concerns the actions of Steven Lipsky, under the advice or direction of Mrs Alicia Rich to intentionally attach a garden hose to a gas vent – not to a water line – and then light and burn the gas from the end of the nozzle of the hose. The demonstration was not done for scientific study but to provide local and national news media a deceptive video, calculated to alarm the public into believing the water was burning. There is further evidence that Rich knew the regional EPA administration and provided or assisted in providing additional mislead information (including the garden hose video) to alarm the EPA. More over the emails in question which refer to this deceptive garden hose demonstration as a “strategy” appear to support that a “meeting of the minds” took place and that a reasonable trier of fact could believe, together with other evidence, That elements of a conspiracy to defame Range exist.

          Therefore pursuant to Texas practice and Remedies code 27 as a finding of fact and conclusion of law, the court observes that Range has presented sufficient clear and specific evidence to maintain a prima facia case with regard to the counter claim against plaintiffs and the third party action against Lisa Rich in that a reasonable trier of fact could believe that a conspiracy to defame Range existed between Lipsky and Mrs Rich.

          http://www.barnettshalenews.com/documents/2012/legal/Court%20Order%20Denial%20of%20Lipsky%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20Range%20Counterclaim%202-16-2012.pdf

          Yes or no? 😆

        • gator69 says:

          Is above your brain grade? 😆

        • gator69 says:

          What up B? 😆

    • Truthseeker says:

      Hope, you are correct … there was no ad hom here.

      • Hope says:

        Oppsss .. guess I should have added the …. /s .. y’all wouldn’t get it sans that.

        • Truthseeker says:

          Hope, thank you for confirming to everyone that you have absolutely no ability in English comprehension and no ability to actually apply any thought to what you write.

          You are very useful as a large, slow moving target that can be used as an example of how the Progressive side of the debate is inept, illogical, dishonest and hypocritical.

          Please continue. More ammunition is always better.

        • darrylb says:

          Hope, instead of just throwing out ad hominem attacks, which serve no purpose, why don’t pick some aspect, like historical temps, hurricanes, drought, back radiation,
          oscillations within the CO2 molecule that absorb certain IR frequencies, greening of the earth, that is anything at any level and state what you think are the facts which can be discussed.

        • Streetcred says:

          “No Hope for you!” said the Soup Nazi.

    • spren says:

      I can’t wait to hear about all the new information the real merchants of doom are going to share this time. And geniuses like you will pay to see it! Just go re-read all the press releases of the past 20 years and save yourself some money, HOPE.

    • Gail Combs says:

      It was a really big flop.

      “Merchants of Doubt” — the new attack-umentory released last week — has been a box-office bomb. Even the anti-carbon activists can’t be bothered watching the rehashed malevolent fantasy speculation about the scientists who dared stand against the establishment.

      Jim Lakely at Heartland reports that total takings were $23,300 last weekend.

      It uses 20 year old documents to absurdly try to tie the smoking campaign to the climate debate. Oreskes fights on the side with billions of dollars but tries to paint herself the victim of intimidation. No is buying it. The Merchants of Doubt is an unwitting self projection of her own obsession trying to sell doubts about honest, upstanding scientists.

      Fred Singer got his PhD in 1948 on cosmic ray showers. His thesis committee included J. Robert Oppenheimer and Niels Bohr. I’d like to see Fred Singer discuss atmospheric physics with Naomi. Bring on the debate that matters and let the smear campaign get all it deserves. – Jo

      • Hope says:

        Did you expect anything else from another member of the denial team??

        • gator69 says:

          You are the denier of natural climate change, I would never be so stupid as to deny climate change as it has happened for 4,500,000,000 years.

          Now answer the question weasel. Did Judge loftis lie when he signed this court document?

          The court, having reviewed the law and evidence as well as motions, briefs and arguments of the counsel of this case denies plaintiffs section 27 Anti-Slapp motion to dismiss Range’s counter claims. The court references with concerns the actions of Steven Lipsky, under the advice or direction of Mrs Alicia Rich to intentionally attach a garden hose to a gas vent – not to a water line – and then light and burn the gas from the end of the nozzle of the hose. The demonstration was not done for scientific study but to provide local and national news media a deceptive video, calculated to alarm the public into believing the water was burning. There is further evidence that Rich knew the regional EPA administration and provided or assisted in providing additional mislead information (including the garden hose video) to alarm the EPA. More over the emails in question which refer to this deceptive garden hose demonstration as a “strategy” appear to support that a “meeting of the minds” took place and that a reasonable trier of fact could believe, together with other evidence, That elements of a conspiracy to defame Range exist.

          Therefore pursuant to Texas practice and Remedies code 27 as a finding of fact and conclusion of law, the court observes that Range has presented sufficient clear and specific evidence to maintain a prima facia case with regard to the counter claim against plaintiffs and the third party action against Lisa Rich in that a reasonable trier of fact could believe that a conspiracy to defame Range existed between Lipsky and Mrs Rich.

          http://www.barnettshalenews.com/documents/2012/legal/Court%20Order%20Denial%20of%20Lipsky%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20Range%20Counterclaim%202-16-2012.pdf

          Yes or no dummy! 😆

        • Gail Combs says:

          “….member of the denial team….”

          A Hope get out of the conversation clause.

          Thanks for more proof of you lack of factual information.

        • AndyG55 says:

          So, no defence of this total flop of fictional BS, Didn’t think so.

          What sort of SUV do you drive?

          and who is paying you ?

      • darrylb says:

        Bohr and J. R. Oppenheimer (not to be confused with the current Oppenheimer)
        what credentials!!!!

    • AndyG55 says:

      Ought be watched on April 1st.. just for blind, wilfully ignorant idiots like you !!

  3. gator69 says:

    I wonder what K-K-K-Katie’s husband thinks about violation of the 9th commandment?

  4. D. Self says:

    Proudly sponsored by Pravda! I suppose they are getting a HUGE bonus from Steyer for this,

  5. Windsong says:

    Q&A with Michael E Mann? I would like to see those questions in advance. Just like his handlers/attorneys will.

  6. tallbloke says:

    I got email from Naomi Oreskes, and then the film’s director, Robert Kenner
    https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2015/03/12/merchants-of-spin-part-2-now-the-films-director-has-emailed-me/

    Too funny.

    • gator69 says:

      I don’t recall the theory of evolution being mainstreamed by fascism. I seem to recall a very famous debate. Has science changed?

      If your theory cannot stand up to criticism, it is a belief. Believe what ever you want, but do not force your beliefs on the nonbelievers. Fundamental Islam and AGW have much in common.

      • AndyG55 says:

        Having Hope around strong enhances the idea that humans are DEVOLVING !!

        Its like trying to teach a 3-toed sloth to count to 2. ..

        She seriously is THAT THICK !!!!

    • Windsong says:

      Roger, I am wondering how Naomi and Roger expect television producers/bookers to be able to identify a “denier?” Perhaps they will start advocating the placement of a numerical tattoo on the forearm of those they designate “deniers.”

    • darrylb says:

      Tallbloke

      RE your reply above: Well done, but I think the Stefan-B. constant/equation being ill-applied is not the only error.

      Another issue, J. C. at Climate etc currently has a thread on the ‘Albedo of the Earth’
      Very important, and another mountain for the alarmists to climb.
      All in all, like the news media looking for bad news, it is a tenant of the alarmists to look for positive feedback, when negative (good) feedback dominates the earth system.
      I suggest the earth is constantly out of equilibrium and whenever disturbed, feedback will tend to draw it back to a favorable balance.

  7. Hope says:

    All the nation needs to see is the mindset of this group .. it is represented so well here.

    • gator69 says:

      Genius! Hello! Did Judge Loftin lie when he signed this court document?

      The court, having reviewed the law and evidence as well as motions, briefs and arguments of the counsel of this case denies plaintiffs section 27 Anti-Slapp motion to dismiss Range’s counter claims. The court references with concerns the actions of Steven Lipsky, under the advice or direction of Mrs Alicia Rich to intentionally attach a garden hose to a gas vent – not to a water line – and then light and burn the gas from the end of the nozzle of the hose. The demonstration was not done for scientific study but to provide local and national news media a deceptive video, calculated to alarm the public into believing the water was burning. There is further evidence that Rich knew the regional EPA administration and provided or assisted in providing additional mislead information (including the garden hose video) to alarm the EPA. More over the emails in question which refer to this deceptive garden hose demonstration as a “strategy” appear to support that a “meeting of the minds” took place and that a reasonable trier of fact could believe, together with other evidence, That elements of a conspiracy to defame Range exist.

      Therefore pursuant to Texas practice and Remedies code 27 as a finding of fact and conclusion of law, the court observes that Range has presented sufficient clear and specific evidence to maintain a prima facia case with regard to the counter claim against plaintiffs and the third party action against Lisa Rich in that a reasonable trier of fact could believe that a conspiracy to defame Range existed between Lipsky and Mrs Rich.

      http://www.barnettshalenews.com/documents/2012/legal/Court%20Order%20Denial%20of%20Lipsky%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20Range%20Counterclaim%202-16-2012.pdf

      Yes or no stupid. Try connecting the few brain cells that may exist in your straw head and answer.

    • Hope, there is nothing preventing anyone from seeing this blog.

      Instead of you making up a bunch of crap based on your inability to follow the discussion, why not send people over to see it for themselves? They might be smarter than you.

    • Hope:

      You are using a highly unusual spelling of your display name.

      The first letter is supposed to represent a voiced alveolar stop, i.e. a consonant articulated with the blade of the tongue at the alveolar ridge, with vocal cords vibrating until all airflow ceases.

      The consonant is not represented by an “H” in any of the languages I speak or know. I recommend that you fix it before the whole nation comes and sees it. It’s one thing to post crap but quite another to post crap under a misspelled name.

    • darrylb says:

      HOPE

      See my comment above, I am waiting for you to present something substantial that we can debate.
      If you don’t then I know you have nothing.

    • AndyG55 says:

      “All the nation needs to see is the mindset of this group’

      Ah you mean HayHoe, Mickey Mann…et al..

      Their minds are set in putrid squirming ooze.. no wonder you worship them.

      None would dare to take on any of the sceptical real scientists. None ever have dared.

      • rah says:

        Here’s a mind set I Love seeing. Lots of negative press for Robert Downey Jr. in the past but here Iron Man show’s his true colors and their bright and beautiful. Notice how he stays in character.

      • Gail Combs says:

        They gave up debating skeptics after Lord Monckton wiped the floor with them at Oxford.
        Lord Monckton wins global warming debate at Oxford Union

        …. The Oxford Union is host to some of the most skillful debates in the world. Many eminent scholars and personalities have come and either debated or delivered speeches in the chamber. Monckton was invited as part of the formal Thursday debate….

        Army of Light and Truth 135, Forces of Darkness 110

        For what is believed to be the first time ever in England, an audience of university undergraduates has decisively rejected the notion that “global warming” is or could become a global crisis. The only previous defeat for climate extremism among an undergraduate audience was at St. Andrew’s University, Scotland, in the spring of 2009, when the climate extremists were defeated by three votes….

        When the Union’s president, Laura Winwood, announced the result in the Victorian-Gothich Gladstone Room, three peers cheered with the undergraduates, and one peer drowned his sorrows in beer.

        Lord Lawson of Blaby, Margaret Thatcher’s former finance minister, opened the case for the proposition by saying that the economic proposals put forward by the UN’s climate panel and its supporters did not add up. It would be better to wait and see whether the scientists had gotten it right. It was not sensible to make expensive spending commitments, particularly at a time of great economic hardship, when the effectiveness of the spending was gravely in doubt and when it might do more harm than good.

        At one point, Lord Lawson was interrupted by a US student, who demanded to know what was his connection with the Science and Public Policy Institute, and what were the Institute’s sources of funding. Lord Lawson was cheered when he said he neither knew nor cared who funded the Institute….

        They know they can not win the debate because they have been defeated and in the five years since 2010 Skeptics have gathered more and more facts that refute CAGW. All CAGW has left is a bag full of dirty tricks, not science.

        • Disillusioned says:

          +1

          But it was never about science. It began with dirty tricks from the very beginning – when then-US Senator (later United Nations Foundation President-now Vice Chair on its Board) Tim Wirth scheduled the 1988 Jim Hansen presentation before Congress on the historically hottest day of the year, and then opened all the windows to the hearing room the night before in order to overload the A/C system. (Tim Wirth’s own account of how it went down in a PBS interview.)

    • Louis Hooffstetter says:

      Hope, I am so looking forward to the debate between you and Steve!
      You agreed to it in a previous thread, but I can’t seem to find when you’ve scheduled it.
      So please tell us, when exactly will you debate Steve?

      We don’t want to miss it!

  8. pinroot says:

    Sort of off topic, but Nuccitelli has a book out and Greg Laden is pimping it for him. It’s called “Climatology Versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics”. It’s at Amazon (for $45!) and already has 3 stars (1 five star, 1 one star lol). Part of Laden’s pimping is showing a graph of Cook and Nutty’s proof of 97% consensus. I suppose somehow that’s supposed to illustrate a “failed skeptic prediction”.

    • mikegeo says:

      As far as I know, the skeptics arent making predictions, they’re simply asking the alarmist proponents for proofs of their theory. And so far they’ve offered lots of innuendo but mostly badly performing computer models. Oh yes, and a slew of failed predictions. But like Harold Camping, there’s always a reason that the last one failed but just you wait – the next one will be true.
      I wont be watching Oreskes imaginings, including whether she incorporated her last warnings of household pets all dying. She is rather Freddy Kruger-like now that you bring it up.

      • Gail Combs says:

        The only prediction I know of is from Dr. Evans Notch-Delay Solar theory. Dr Evans is specific on his predictions of a drop in temperature of at least 0.2°C, maybe 0.5°C starting in 2017.

        There are three big drops in solar radiation in the 400 years of records. The first, in the 1600s, led to the Maunder Minimum, the coldest time in the last 400 years. The second in Napoleon’s time, led to the Dalton Minimum, the second coldest time in the last 400 years. The third started in 2004, but hasn’t led to cooling…yet. The notch-delay theory says that the fall in TSI signals a fall in force X which acts after a delay, which seems to be 11 years. So the fall will occur in 2004 + 11 = 2015. But the delay is tied to the solar cycle length, currently 13 years, so the cooling is more likely to start in 2004 + 13 = 2017. The cooling will be at least 0.2°C, maybe 0.5°C, enough to undo global warming back to the 1950s. The carbon dioxide and ND solar theories have been in agreement over the least century due to generally rising carbon dioxide and solar radiation, but now they sharply diverge. Only one of them can be correct, and soon we’ll know which one. Here’s the criterion: A fall of at least 0.1°C (on a 1-year smoothed basis) in global average surface air temperature over the next decade. If the criterion does not occur then the ND solar theory is rubbish and should be thrown away. If it does occur then the carbon dioxide theory is rubbish, and should be thrown away.

        Go to the link for direction to the explanation and discussion of the theory. Several others have also made similar predictions based on the sun but none as nice and clear cut as Dr Evans. For example:Russian Academy Of Sciences Experts Warn Of Imminent Cold Period: “Global Warming Is A Marketing Trick”

        There is only other ‘prediction’ I know of, and it is more nebulous is this:

        A Pliocene-Pleistocene stack of 57 globally distributed benthic D18O records
        Lisiecki & Raymo
        ABSTRACT
        We present a 5.3-Myr stack (the ‘‘LR04’’ stack) of benthic d18O records from 57 globally distributed sites aligned by an automated graphic correlation algorithm. This is the first benthic d18O stack composed of more than three records to extend beyond 850 ka,…

        RESULTS
        Recent research has focused on MIS 11 as a possible analog for the present interglacial [e.g., Loutre and Berger, 2003; EPICA Community Members, 2004] because both occur during times of low eccentricity. The LR04 age model establishes that MIS 11 spans two precession cycles, with d18O values below 3.6% for 20 kyr, from 398 – 418 ka. In comparison, stages 9 and 5 remained below 3.6% for 13 and 12 kyr, respectively, and the Holocene interglacial has lasted 11 kyr so far. In the LR04 age model, the average LSR of 29 sites is the same from 398– 418 ka as from 250–650 ka; consequently, stage 11 is unlikely to be artificially stretched. However, the 21 June insolation minimum at 65°N during MIS 11 is only 489 W/m2, much less pronounced than the present minimum of 474 W/m2. In addition, current insolation values are not predicted to return to the high values of late MIS 11 for another 65 kyr. We propose that this effectively precludes a ‘‘double precession cycle’’ interglacial [e.g., Raymo, 1997] in the Holocene without human influence….

        A newer paper from the fall of 2012 a href=”http://www.clim-past.net/8/1473/2012/cp-8-1473-2012.pdf”>Can we predict the duration of an interglacial? agrees and gives the calculated solar insolation values @ 65N on June 22 for several glacial inceptions:

        Current value – insolation = 479W m−2 (from that paper)

        MIS 7e – insolation = 463 W m−2,
        MIS 11c – insolation = 466 W m−2,
        MIS 13a – insolation = 500 W m−2,
        MIS 15a – insolation = 480 W m−2,
        MIS 17 – insolation = 477 W m−2

        (Changes near the north polar area, about 65 degrees North, are considered important due to the great amount of land. Land masses respond to temperature change more quickly than oceans.)

        You can see why there is an argument. Solar insolation isn’t a cut and dried measure for glacial inception. Steve BTW thinks the Holocene will go long.

        Either way the climate is not going to warm for the next 65,000 years. The earth will have an unstable climate caused by being near the glaciation threshold if it follows the MIS 11 pattern. The Holocene has been quite the stable interglacial compared to the others. That may end quite soon and it has nothing to do with CO2.

        • Jl says:

          Hpoes’s predictable response of “those are just talking points put out by the fossil fuel industry!” in 3….2…..

        • gator69 says:

          You can talk to Hope right now, if you look to the right.

        • Gail Combs says:

          No, No Gator you have to look LEFT.

        • gator69 says:

          Why is everyone hiding from Hope?

        • Gail Combs says:

          Because we are afraid insanity is catching.

          You get it from trying to carry out a rational logical discussion with an emoting leftist.

        • gator69 says:

          Running away wins no battles.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Actually I have leaped into the fray on occasion. Now I am afraid it is off to bed.

          Unfortunately with the comments up to 600+ my computer is now threatening to crash if I load that page. It has crashed opera three times today.

        • gator69 says:

          Hope is waiting for us to log off, so she can thread bomb. Mark my words.

        • gator69 says:

          I have someone else begging for my attention now, and she aint a crazy troll looking liar, so Hope can have it til morning. Expect more mindless barking about a case nobody has heard, and lies about Loftin’s ruling.

          Incessant strawmaning from the original strawtroll. If only she had a brain.

  9. Where are Hope’s friends?
    I’m thinking there may be a little team effort going on there?

    • Gail Combs says:

      I know there is.
      If you look through the 600+ comments, someone brought up the adjustments to the temperature record and we got the one sentence “those are just talking points put out by the fossil fuel industry!” or what ever denying any adjustment s had been made.

      Later when I and a couple others discussed the adjustments, she acknowledge the adjustments were done but were legit. A complete about face and no name calling.

      • gator69 says:

        Liars cannot keep up with their nebulous stories, Telling the truth is easy because you only have to memorize one set of facts per subject. Crazy people like Hope are all over the map. One minute she said that the document was not a court ruling and the next said it was. She calls me a liar for quoting Loftins order, but then refuses to call Loftin a liar. I cite a ruling and she strawmans a case unheard.

        Off her meds.

        • AndyG55 says:

          Or just having a bad “change”.

          What I don’t understand is that she says she has a child, but obviously spends zero time with him/her. I suspect the child has actually been taken out of harms way, which is why she is so bitter and twisted.

          Her whole life is spent on forums, where she is a loud-mouth ignorant non-entity, getting abuse for being so stupid.

          That takes a very special sort of inner ugliness !!

    • AndyG55 says:

      3 of them for a new movie..

      Dumb, Dumber and DUMBEST !!!

  10. NancyG says:

    More likely her “child” is Gaia whom she takes care of by sitting in a comfy chair in her heated home at her electrically powered computer. She should go out and plant some trees instead.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s