As the hiatus continues, experts are forecasting an unprecednted rise in temperatures
This is exactly the same story they were pushing six years ago.
World will warm faster than predicted in next five years, study warns | Environment | The Guardian
There has been no warming since the Guardian’s 2009 forecast.
Satellites show that there has been no tropospheric warming for almost 20 years. They are reliant on a misinformed public and compliant press to keep this scam alive.
Real Science 
“World will warm faster than predicted in next five years, study warns.”
Based on which predictions?
Some paper a member of the “consensus” had gleefully published in a “science” publication of course. You wanna see some real global warming followed by cooling? Burn all the “peer reviewed” bull shit these clowns have published over the last 25 years.
Joseph Goebels:
“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”
The flat 2009-present temperature graph above is for Hadley’s Climate Research Unit at East Anglia U (which the Met Office and the Guardian like to refer to.
When looking at RSS satellite dataset for the same period of time the temperature trend is plunging.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/graph/rss/from:2009/plot/rss-land/from:2009/trend
I have begun to initiate conversations about climate change with random people who I run into in my travels and while on the job, after spending many years actually avoiding any conversations on the entire topic.
I run into people from all over the country and the world.
Early indications are just as mentioned here: people are in general quite uninformed. No one I have conversed with (just ordinary folks) has any idea of the sunspot cycle, the pause, ” adjusted” data, character assassination of skeptical scientists, or any of the other things being discussed daily on climate blogs.
People are, however, very sceptical of global warming, although reluctant to say much until I start to tell them some of the truth. This they invariably find very interesting.
My experience has been nearly identical. The most fervent believers are the ones keyboarding on the Internet (and have talking points of the propagandists down to a… ahem, science).
I don’t run into those types in everyday life. The people I run into are ignorant, but much more open.
I have been checking the public on various issues for a decade or more.
Food safety was a big Yawn.
The Banks and fractional reserve banking is a real hot spot and most of the people I meet know a lot about it.
CAGW – few people believe and most aren’t that interested though I am finding more interest in the last few years.
Par for the course with the Guardian. They’re masters of the ‘projected headline’ for several years ahead, which of course is always ‘worse than previously thought’ etc.
It allows them the hysterical headline (usually supported with hundreds of equally shouty BTL comments form their Green acolytes) without actually having to justify their headline assertions with facts.
And when their predictions completely fail to materialise years later….? Silence!
I agree with all that you said except the very last “Silence.” When things don’t work out as they claimed they just double down on what they said and always add in the required “it’s even worse than we had thought.” I guess you are right about their silence about being wrong and never even acknowledging the fact, but they just shout louder, call more names, stamp their feet, and proceed as if nothing has occurred.
These maniacs will not be happy until the earth’s population is 2 billion or less and totally mind controlled. We are dealing with crazy people who have patterned their dogma based on the movie Solyent Green.
How in the hell is temperature suppose to respond exponentially when the response to a doubling of CO2 is a natural log function? We have already seen the largest part of the predicted temperature increase based on that ln function. What is left of the remaining doubling is nothing to speak of. Out of what orifice are these researchers pulling their data?
There you go thinking again. Better be careful. Don’t you know that it is a crime to question the foregone conclusions of the consensus? (If not a crime now, it will be, and ‘ex post facto’ and the constitution and bill of rights be dammed, such law will be made retroactive)
Bigfoot researchers agree!
Here you go gator,
Straight from that great purveyor of Truth, Huff & Puff!
Yeti Hunt: DNA Tests On Mystery Hairs Reveal They Are From ‘An Unknown Animal Closely Related To Man’
Eyewitnesses have come forward and worked with a police sketch artist to illustrate the specimen…
Oh, MY GOSH!
It s Manbearpig!!!!
Chiming in comes the weather channel. “Earth Records Its Warmest Winter on Record”
http://www.weather.com/science/environment/news/warmest-winter-on-record-earth
They’ve moved from “next year”, to “within five years”, to “multi-decadal” because the pause continues. When temperatures actually turn back down again, the squealing and squirming is going to be something to behold.
At least we have a lot of consistency in climate science. What’s projected, modeled, or adjusted almost always shows a warming trend. What’s actually measured usually doesn’t.
Thanks for finally writing about >Repeating The Same Lie Over And
Over And Over Again | Real Science <Loved it!