This article is a great example of how climate experts use sciency sounding talk to confuse their readers with mindless BS
Then he goes on and on with a bunch of jargon to make it sounds like he is saying something.
So let’s put his theory to the test. If the amount of greenhouse gas significantly affected the dry (unsaturated) lapse rate, then days with higher humidity would have a higher lapse rate than days with low humidity – because more humidity means more greenhouse gas.
But the unsaturated lapse rate is not significantly affected by humidity (until it reaches 100% when the lapse rate actually decreases) showing that the lapse rate has little to do with the greenhouse effect.
Test number two. Venus surface is dark for months at a time due to very slow planetary rotation – yet the lapse rate and surface temperature does not change considerably. Obviously it is not the “greenhouse effect” (trapped sunlight) making it hot.
These clowns learn a few words, and a little math – yet don’t think through simple tests to determine if what they are doing makes any sense.