Basic Physics Of Climate Change

  1. Climate change is bad.
  2. Climate change causes more hurricanes.
  3. Climate change causes more droughts in California.
  4. Climate change heats up the Pacific Ocean, which causes more El Ninos
  5. More El Ninos means more rain for California
  6. More El Ninos means fewer hurricanes.
  7. Climate change is bad.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Basic Physics Of Climate Change

  1. omanuel says:

    Earth and its heat source, the Sun, have evolved and changed since the birth of the solar system five billion years (5 Ga) ago.

    Climate change became government propaganda for a common enemy of the world soon after Nations were United for one worldwide government on 24 Oct 1945.

    George Orwell started writing Nineteen Eighty-Four in 1946, as falsehoods were inserted into the foundations of nuclear, solar and theoretical physics.

    • omanuel says:

      Attempts to save the world by forbidding public knowledge of the source of energy that destroyed Hiroshima – neutron repulsion – instead destroyed the very foundations of astronomy, astrophysics, climatology, cosmology, nuclear, planetary and solar physics. See “Teacher’s Supplement to Solar Energy”

      Click to access Supplement.pdf

  2. Marsh says:

    Climate Change is but a Natural process ; mankind plays a minimal part in the real outcome.
    CC is bad when it involves data tampering and fraudulent propaganda by AGW extremists…

  3. Moors710 says:

    When I started studying Physics, the Earth was only 4 billion years ago. That must have been a billion years ago.

  4. Pathway says:

    The logic is impeccable if you’re a maroon.

    • Marsh says:

      Yea, they probably are maroon with the cost to society ; moron also fits & we know what they are running; it’s not the asylum…

  5. If you think a drought in the desert is proof of global warming, you’re dumber than a container of trakehners.

  6. markstoval says:

    The total lack of logic, total lack of scientific integrity, total inability to follow long chains of logical argument, and inability to understand the difference between models and real world observation is rampant in the climate “science” field. BUT, these things and more are not confined to just the field of climatology. For example medicine, biology, and food safety are rampant with the same sort of un-scientific shenanigans as climatology..

  7. gator69 says:

    A guest post by David Appell?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s