Temperature Data Tampering For Propaganda Purposes Vs. Actual Science

ScreenHunter_1508 Apr. 14 11.30

ScreenHunter_1509 Apr. 14 11.31

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

46 Responses to Temperature Data Tampering For Propaganda Purposes Vs. Actual Science

  1. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    If you use a 12 month running average it really shows up.

  2. Stephen Fisher says:

    Eric “Hot house”…

  3. Password Protected says:

    Is anyone else surprised that Japan seems on board with temp adjustments and the AGW meme?
    I thought they would have been more objective.

  4. KTM says:

    How can someone post a chart showing linear temperature increase for the last 125+ years, then claim the “baseline” is a horizontal mean drawn through 1981-2010?

    The “baseline” is obviously the red trend line, and the rest are the climactic changes. Since we’re right at the long-term trend, there is no variation for human-influence left to explain.

    • Jason Calley says:

      Hey KTM! I was thinking something similar, but you said it better. The CAGW folk post a chart that shows warming started long before the CO2 showed any significant rise. The chart shows that the current warming (with higher CO2) is the same as the previous warming (without higher CO2). Their claim? “LOOK! We humans are causing a catastrophic change!” Those idiots don’t even realize that they have just disproved their own scam.

      • Andy DC says:

        Interesting point. Even if you accept that BS chart at face value, the rate of rise was roughly the same between 1890 to 1930 as it was from 1975 to 2015. Since CO2 rise was not significant between 1890 and 1930 and was between 1975 and 2015, the logical conclusion is that the rate of CO2 rise is a non factor with respect to temperature change.

      • John Smith says:

        if only this were a rational debate about data
        the only thing that matters to them is that there is a square
        with squiggly lines
        and a scary red line that goes up at a really scary angle
        if the line were flat then it wouldn’t be scary and it wouldn’t be red
        if went down, then it would be scary again and be red
        it is also important that the .0 gradations are sufficiently large on the vertical scale in
        relation the horizontal scale as to look more scary
        tenths of a degree compared to decades…not an issue
        nobody reads the little numbers on the side so it’s ok
        remember the words of the great philosopher David Lee Roth
        “it doesn’t matter what you do as long as you look good doing it”

        • gregole says:

          Holthouse needs to wake up. The linear interpolation line in his graph show monotonic warming from the late 19th century on. Just what year signifies when the heating is from the Man-Made CO2? Looks to me like the entire graph shows absolutely nothing but recovery from the LIA.

          Oh, Holthouse, what is the “correct” temperature of the earth? I’m hoping it’s warmer than now. Some like it hot!

  5. gator69 says:

    If just once, they would stop it with the “hottest ever” claims, they might actually fool those who are not complete idiots.

    Used car salesmen, the world over, are feeling pretty good about themselves right now.

    • Jason Calley says:

      Ask the CAGW crowd, “If today’s climate is the warmest ever, why are most of the state’s high temperature records seventy years old?”

      The most probable answer? “But, but, but, 97%!”

    • rah says:

      “Used car salesmen, the world over, are feeling pretty good about themselves right now.’
      They have every reason to with the snake oil salesmen in town.

    • AndyG55 says:

      “Used car salesmen,”

      You mean, Mosher ! Dodgy Bros in the flesh !!

  6. R. de Haan says:

    It’s hard to soar like an eagle when you’re surrounded by turkey’s. Gable gable, gable gable.

    • gator69 says:

      I’m confused. Are you a Clark Gable fan?

      Or is it this…


      • So am I. A surprising choice for a rooster, with a fricative “G” to boot:

        Klok-klok klok-klok?

        • gator69 says:

          Do you speak Foxese?

          A French friend once told me the hardest French word for Americans to say is…

          Interestingly, Jeremy Clarkson claims the same about Germans and “squirrel”…

        • Clarkson thought it was all a great joke because he didn’t understand the sheer horror he stumbled upon. How much more evidence do we need? It’s not about the Germans (or the French). It’s He Who Must Not Be Named who hates being named. Stunted speech and impaired judgment are only the mildest symptoms afflicting those who try. It must never be done. Clarkson paid for his error.

          The scientist who gave his account in the attached post was foolish enough to call Him by His Name even though he knew better. He was lucky to survive. His diary is incomplete but we know he was defeated and had to leave the country:

          “The street I live on abounds with squirrels. Fat, slow moving, overfed, aggressive squirrels that live by raiding the trashcans. And there is one of them, he who must not be named, …

          I saw him and screamed, a scream that would have chilled the heart of my enemies. He turned. I took two steps towards him, stick in hand …

          My anemones were lying sprayed across my balcony. Not one other plant was touched. And on the railing, eying me with steely hostility was the squirrel who must not be named …”


          The people in the following story also paid dearly for Naming Him:

        • gator69 says:

          Squirrel, James Squrrel.

  7. nickreality65 says:

    JMA’s plot/curve fit looks pretty flat from about 2000 on. And a real data 0.83 C/century straight line trend is pretty far below IPCC’s modeled values of 4.0 C or 2.0 C or 1.5 C or whatever it is this week. Ask JMA what they see for a sea level rise trend. Last I checked what they saw was within historical variations.

  8. Hope Forjohncleese says:

    They’ve adjusted themselves into a corner. Why the temperature rise from 1910 to 1945? This was prior to large scale man made emissions of CO2.

  9. AndyG55 says:

    JMA use Gavin’s NCDC/GHCN fabrications, don’t they?

    This makes their temperature series meaningless and irrelevant against reality.

  10. nickreality65 says:

    “JMA use Gavin’s NCDC/GHCN fabrications, don’t they?”

    Good question, need to confirm the answer. They might have their own independent data.

  11. When Mr Holthaus can explain how the world’s climate climate went from Roman Warming to cold Dark Ages to MWP to LIA, then he might be able to explain why 20thC warming was not also caused by natural factors.

  12. I’m always looking forward to your article.

    I’m Japanese, but I don’t believe a report of JMA.
    I believe satellite data.
    And I believe your words.

    The report of JMA is an advertisement of mere Global warming.
    They disregard the actuality always.

  13. nickreality65 says:

    If JMA is advertising AGW they are doing a poor job of it with this graph.

  14. sabretoothed says:

    Why did it go up from 1890 to 1990 then?

  15. nickreality65 says:

    Compared to what? Not the US trend. Consider how small Japan is compared to US. And less than 1.0 C delta. Where are the uncertainty bands? If they want to portray an ominous trend this graph doesn’t do it.

  16. Dear Eric,

    14 of my 12 tallest years all happened after I stopped growing. Should I check my pituitary gland?

  17. c_woof says:

    Funny how no-one seems to mind the little red line in Steve’s graph going down from 2014 to 2015 while the little blue line (presumably the actual temp) goes up from 2014 to 2015…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s