Celebrating 50 Years Of Progressive Rule In The UK

ScreenHunter_8719 Apr. 19 14.41 ScreenHunter_8720 Apr. 19 14.42

London  1967                                                       London 2015

Progressive policies are destroying everything we value. They have to go.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

78 Responses to Celebrating 50 Years Of Progressive Rule In The UK

  1. gator69 says:

    The ancient Christians were not paranoid, and neither are we. Classical civilization suffered under these Muslim assaults for 450 years before the first “crusade” even took place.

    • Chris Barron says:

      “The ancient Christians were not paranoid,”

      It’s not a bad video but you can’t call christians of 600AD (the time when islam began) ancient. The christians around prior to then weren’t in fear of Islam either.

      I was at an old burial ground today, first burial was about 5500BC when a henge was constructed…a wooden death mask was found on the remains, together with clay pots and a wooden club……then 5000BC another burial took place and a cairn was constructed….then 4000BC the last pre christian burial took place and another cairn was constructed, covering the first. At 2000BC more activity took place but not burials

      In 100AD the first christian burial took place at this location which makes many people wonder…who were the people who predated christianity…..picts, celts ?

      The Romans attempted to invade Scotland but found the residents too savage and withdrew….the Roman crusades were bloodier than anything which went before them.

      No civilisation has survived for more than a few thousand years and death of civilisations is a common feature of all organised human societies…..and yet we still don’t know for sure what causes the collapses, we can only speculate.

      I suppose the question is how we deal with clashes of civilisations from here on…….history is ironically only a very modern thing…..before arcaeolgy, carbon dating, ground radar and written records came about very few people had access to information about their ancestors which were tangible, most only had word of mouth.

      The way to defeat ISIS and extremist islam is compulsory McDonalds, cable TV and high levels of sugar in the diet, anything which makes everyone the same is a good start 😉

      • gator69 says:

        Are you bored Chris?

        You are a blowhard, and I need no history lessons or lessons on religion from people as ignorant of history and religion as you…

        Chris: stoning to death by christianity, as spelled out in the bible

        That is what intelligent people call ‘The Old Testament’, and existed before Christ, you moron.

        When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.”
        -John 8:7

        Come on Chris! Show us your vast knowledge! 😆

        Do I need to repeat that you were wrong, again? Yep!

        Chris the village idiot spews:

        “Islamic Law”…Nobody fears it. It doesn’t actually exist

        Why do you feel it necessary to keep proving that you are an idiot? We know already! 😆

        To Arabic-speaking people, sharia (/ʃɑːˈriːɑː/;[1] also shari’a, sharīʿah; Arabic: شريعة‎ šarīʿah, IPA: [ʃaˈriːʕa], “legislation”) means the moral code and religious law of a prophetic religion.[2][3][4] The term “sharia” has been largely identified with Islam in English usage.[5]

        Sharia (Islamic law) deals with several topics including: crime, politics, and economics, as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, hygiene, diet, prayer, everyday etiquette and fasting..

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia

        Webster’s defininition of ancient…

        ANCIENT: 1- having had an existence of many years, 2- of or relating to a remote period, to a time early in history, or to those living in such a period or time; especially : of or relating to the historical period beginning with the earliest known civilizations and extending to the fall of the western Roman Empire in a.d. 476, 3- having the qualities of age or long existence

        So yes, “ancient” applies.

        And of course the Musims got along to get along, as they always do when they have no real power. Study the dfifference between Mohammads actions and words between Mecca and Medina.

        You are a waste of space and time.

        • Chris Barron says:

          “You are a waste of space and time.”

          You must be more bored than I in order to find it in yourself to discuss these things with me in that case

          “Study the dfifference between Mohammads actions and words between Mecca and Medina.”

          Study fantastical myths and legends to compare one set of lies with another ? No Thanks 🙂

          ” of or relating to the historical period beginning with the earliest known civilizations and extending to the fall of the western Roman Empire in a.d. 476, 3- having the qualities of age or long existence”

          THEREFORE I AM CORRECT…..christians who were paranoid about muslims only existed after islam was created, in a.d. 600.
          a.d. 476is the latest time something can be called ancient, according to webster’s. a.d. 600 is not in the period called ancient by Webster’s

        • gator69 says:

          The Village Idiot says: Study fantastical myths and legends to compare one set of lies with another ? No Thanks

          It’s called “history” VI, another subject about which you are ignorant.

          The Village Idiot says: THEREFORE I AM CORRECT

          ANCIENT: 3- having the qualities of age or long existence

          No, you are wrong, again VI.

          The Village Idiot says: christians who were paranoid about muslims only existed after islam was created

          Again, we know religion is not a subject with which you are familiar VI.

          The Village Idiot says: stoning to death by christianity, as spelled out in the bible

          That is what intelligent people call ‘The Old Testament’, and existed before Christ, you moron.

          When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.”
          -John 8:7

          Come on Chris! Show us your vast knowledge! 😆

          Do I need to repeat that you were wrong, again? Yep!

          Chris the village idiot spews:

          “Islamic Law”…Nobody fears it. It doesn’t actually exist

          Why do you feel it necessary to keep proving that you are an idiot? We know already! 😆

          To Arabic-speaking people, sharia (/ʃɑːˈriːɑː/;[1] also shari’a, sharīʿah; Arabic: شريعة‎ šarīʿah, IPA: [ʃaˈriːʕa], “legislation”) means the moral code and religious law of a prophetic religion.[2][3][4] The term “sharia” has been largely identified with Islam in English usage.[5]

          Sharia (Islamic law) deals with several topics including: crime, politics, and economics, as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, hygiene, diet, prayer, everyday etiquette and fasting..

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia

      • Chris Barron says:

        Gator insists “It’s called “history” ”
        He pleads “Study the dfifference between Mohammads actions and words between Mecca and Medina.”

        Unlike you,Gator i do not consider the words of a so called religious prophet to be history…..you remain free to believe that Mohammad was real and the prophet for the religion which you follow……….

        • gator69 says:

          The Village idiot says: Unlike you,Gator i do not consider the words of a so called religious prophet to be history…..

          his·to·ry noun: 1. the study of past events, particularly in human affairs.

          You are truly the dumbest person I have ever met. 😆

          I guess it is your failure to study history, that forces you to continue to say stupid sh*t.

          Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
          -George Santayana

          And thanks for another keeper! 😆

        • Chris Barron says:

          By you’re own quotes you believe the muslim prophet was real.

          That’s fine, but no thanks, the jehovahs witnesses are due any minute too……they’ll probably expect a piece of cake and some tea

        • gator69 says:

          The Village Idiot says: By you’re own quotes you believe the muslim prophet was real.

          How drunk are you? Nobody is this stupid. 😆

          Born approximately in 570 CE in the Arabian city of Mecca,[8][9] Muhammad was orphaned at an early age; he was raised under the care of his paternal uncle Abu Talib. After his childhood Muhammad primarily worked as a merchant.[10] Occasionally he would retreat to a cave in the mountains for several nights of seclusion and prayer; later, at age 40, he reported at this spot,[8][11] that he was visited by Gabriel and received his first revelation from God. Three years after this event Muhammad started preaching these revelations publicly, proclaiming that “God is One”, that complete “surrender” (lit. islām) to Him is the only way (dīn)[n 3] acceptable to God, and that he was a prophet and messenger of God, similar to other Islamic prophets.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad#Early_biographies

          Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, was born in Mecca around the year 570. Orphaned before he had reached the age of six, he was raised under the protection of his uncle Abu Talib. Muhammad began working as a merchant and became known for his trustworthiness.

          When he was about twenty-five, he married Khadija, a wealthy widow whose status elevated Muhammad’s position in Meccan society. Muhammad and Khadija had four daughters and two sons, both of whom died in infancy.

          http://www.pbs.org/empires/islam/profilesmuhammed.html

          Muhammad was a real person, a historical figure, but your willful ignorance makes you say otherwise.

          Thanks for another keeper! 😆

        • Chris Barron says:

          Fuck me Gator !….I didn’t know you had your own rule book
          http://www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals

          …..keep that ridicule coming……..

          Back to rules 5 and 8….come on now

        • gator69 says:

          Nobody would have you Dumb Dumb, least of all me! 😆

          Now, would you care to explain your rant?

        • Chris Barron says:

          It’s such a great story Gator……really…….

          As a human in possession of a level of sanity, why not share with me the details of the moment when you read that and went from being skeptical, to being someone who believes without question what you read…..and give the details of what it was in the information which you could use to validate it’s authenticity

          I guess, it was once written in a book, so therefore it must be truth……

          Time for a rule 5 for radicals, gator http://www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals

        • gator69 says:

          Now you are completely incoherent. You will have to try harder, or sleep this off.

        • Chris Barron says:

          I think you need to read rule 7 Gator
          http://www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals

          Before responding you refer to ‘the rules’…………it’s getting predictable

        • gator69 says:

          Me thinks you project too much. :

          Really Chris, stop now, my sides are hurting again!:lol:

        • Chris Barron says:

          “Now you are completely incoherent.”

          Yes of course….you do seem to be so deeply engaged in discussion all the same, so I am not alone 😉

          You activists eh ? What are you like !

        • gator69 says:

          Why? Are you trying to woo me now?

          You already asked me to have sex with you once today. Get a magazine already! 😆

        • Chris Barron says:

          “Really Chris, stop now, my sides are hurting again!:lol:”

          Nobody’s humour is so deeply rooted that it can defeat the withering feeling of ‘why am I bothering to do this’ Comedians get depressed don’t they…..

          On with the activism anyway !

        • gator69 says:

          What acitivism drunkard? Isn’t it nearly 1 AM where you are?

          Time for bed Dumb Dumb.

        • Chris Barron says:

          Lets get this straight….do you believe that what is written on Wikipedia, a representation of what is claimed about the existence of Mohammad, is beyond question and is accurate, historical fact as it were ?

        • gator69 says:

          And PBS Chris. PBS not known for religious zealotry either.

          And yes, I believe what I read there as much as you believe the wind turbine propaganda you ciite.

      • Neal S says:

        Chris wrote “No civilisation has survived for more than a few thousand years”.

        I wonder how old Jewish civilization is. Has anyone checked the date on the Jewish calendar? But very few people want to consider the extent of Jewish civilization in area or time in the ages past.

        • Truthseeker says:

          The indigenious Australians have a continuous culture going back 40,000 years. I guess it depends on what you call “civlisation”.

  2. omanuel says:

    Progressive policies and government LIES were Stalin’s way of controlling the world after he emerged victorious from WWII.

    The Swedish and Norwegian National Academies of Sciences merit special recognition for giving Nobel and Crafoord Prizes to those who best helped Stalin isolate the public from reality.

  3. To be fair, I doubt the protesters have the bods to make the dress work as intended.

    • Andy Oz says:

      I’m glad to see they’re wearing High-Viz for OH&S reasons.
      That bra from 1967 could take someone’s eye out!!
      All those blokes should be wearing eye protection.
      😉

  4. diogenese2 says:

    Steve, much as I admire you and daily peruse your blog with delight, sometimes you stretch a theme a bit beyond its contents. These ladies are exercising the traditional British practice of the obscure and pointless demonstration. Who the f*** is Sergei Brin anyway? This was a LICENSED demonstration as indicated by the high visibility jackets ( Health and Safety Act 2005) and the police (similarly attired in the background). I see that it was held in Buckingham Palace Road, the double red line indicating a “no stopping zone”, so it was a Sunday demonstration (bookable about 3 months in advance). What it was about god (or Allah) only knows! The question “does google teach manners?” I answered by googling “manners” with 55.9m links in 0.74 seconds, quite a teaching resource. The ladies were obviously “progressive muslims” as I could see the ankles of the lady in pink on the left. The old chap kneeling looks vaguely familiar – if its who I think it is he is probably praying that his wife does not see this picture.

    • Chris Barron says:

      The classic, relevant and funny summation of what you said…

    • Islam has proven itself vile… I say just keep it in the Middle East…

    • Where can Muslims Protest in the Middle East like this??

      Which Country??

      This isnt a protest but an assault on the West… the protest Google for Chrissake while ignoring more important acts caused by THEIR Religion… daily killings and bombings in the Middle East for 15 years now… these tools do NOTHING to change that or speak out… but Google… sheesh… this is about Politics and Religion… not Protest…

      • Chris Barron says:

        But they don’t live in the middle east.

        • No, they don’t live in the Middle East…

          Everything about their dress, culture … though… still is Middle East. They live in the UK as ‘refugees’ yet aren’t willing to protest or shed what they escaped… instead protesting against where they are.. hence Google… f_ck the Queen… Kill the Queen…

      • Chris Barron says:

        “this is about Politics and Religion”

        Isn’t it always about those two people-control technologies ?

        • Ha ha.. i suppose it is…

          Overall I don’t see how Western Nations have benefited by importing Islam… there’s strife… subjugation of British Culture.. and a vocal angry minority abound…

          Chris.. please cite a few ways Islam and Muslims as a whole… have benefited Western Nations and Themselves the past 20-30 years???

        • gator69 says:

          Chris is completely ignorant of religion, if you have not noticed. He was not even aware that he is part of a religion…

          “Atheism is religion… even though it expressly rejects a belief in a supreme being,”

          Click to access 13-1009-2013-08-16.pdf

  5. Lance says:

    It is relatively easy for a “progressive muslim” to “protest” in the UK. Wonder what it is about their religion that doesn’t enable such similar protests in every muslim dominated nation on Earth. Once they figure that out, meaningful discussion might be had. Adducing heroism to the protesters in the UK is an affront to those opposing oppression in other places where individual liberty is not protected.

    • gator69 says:

      RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.

      http://www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals

    • Chris Barron says:

      I disagree Lance……things have liberaled up in recent years and you can now see the film containing the sex scenes of Jesus screwing Mary whatshername….if the correct warnings about the content are given first…but films depicting scandalous christian acts, or films depicting the monarchy doing something not quite correct get hauled up by the censors when they wouldn’t do if the act was not set in a christian context

      I wish we had some equality, but censorship for the sake of not offending christians is still pretty widespread

      • gator69 says:

        A “Christian act” is to love thy neighbor as thyself. Actions that are not in line with that, are not “Christian” acts.

        Quit spewing about subjects on which you are so incredibly ignorant.

        The village idiot just keeps burnishing his religious credentials! 😆

        stoning to death by christianity, as spelled out in the bible

        That is what intelligent people call ‘The Old Testament’, and existed before Christ, you moron.

        When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, “Let any one of you who is without sin be the first to throw a stone at her.”
        -John 8:7

        Come on Chris! Show us your vast knowledge! 😆

        Do I need to repeat that you were wrong, again? Yep!

        Chris the village idiot spews:

        “Islamic Law”…Nobody fears it. It doesn’t actually exist

        Why do you feel it necessary to keep proving that you are an idiot? We know already! 😆

        To Arabic-speaking people, sharia (/ʃɑːˈriːɑː/;[1] also shari’a, sharīʿah; Arabic: شريعة‎ šarīʿah, IPA: [ʃaˈriːʕa], “legislation”) means the moral code and religious law of a prophetic religion.[2][3][4] The term “sharia” has been largely identified with Islam in English usage.[5]

        Sharia (Islamic law) deals with several topics including: crime, politics, and economics, as well as personal matters such as sexual intercourse, hygiene, diet, prayer, everyday etiquette and fasting..

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia

        • Chris Barron says:

          ““Christian act” i”

          Who said christian act ? only you, not me.

          I said a ‘christian context’….meaning you can probably make a film which is suggestive of terrible acts if it takes place in a time or place which cannot be identified as a strongly religious one….but if yoi set the same film in christian context….taking place in a temple in the presence of Jesus for example, censors would view it differently.

          We can imagine that such a film is intended to be a work of fiction, and that nobody would consider a horrendous act to be christian act, just because it took place in a film set in a christian context

        • gator69 says:

          The Village idiot says: I disagree Lance……things have liberaled up in recent years and you can now see the film containing the sex scenes of Jesus screwing Mary whatshername….if the correct warnings about the content are given first…but films depicting scandalous christian acts, or films depicting the monarchy doing something not quite correct get hauled up by the censors when they wouldn’t do if the act was not set in a christian context

          You said it Dumb Dumb. Put the bottle down and go to bed before you spew more BS. You are ignorant on the subject of religion, so shut up already.

          Need I remind everyone again VI? 😆

        • Chris Barron says:

          A clear example is the comedy film ‘The Life of Brian; Which was banned in some parts of Scotland, Ireland and Norway.

          Quote
          Banned Monty Python Movie”The Life of Brian” was not only banned in Scotland, but other countries. The heading reads “The Right to Slander God?” as far as Christians felt. It was considered by some of the people of these countries as blasphemy (Religious Defamation.” By granting the right of freedom of speech, the state was trying to protect the right to objectively criticize religious institutions and thus, refused to punish or exclude those accused of blasphemy. Legal protection was aimed more at the religious feelings of individuals.
          The modern cases of slandering God that the world has grappled with in the 20th and 21st centuries have mostly been related to artists who have allegedly injured the feelings of others. Usually the chosen form of their statements are understood to be as reproachful as the content.
          Simply put, “The Life of Brian” was making a laughing stock (thinking of it as comedy) out of God and the Crucifiction of Jesus. It was not well received in Europe at all.

        • gator69 says:

          Shows the ignorance of you and your neighbors. I am big Monty Python fan, and have seen that film many times. I know a joke when I see one, and I see you! 😆

        • Chris Barron says:

          And christians are leaning on Disney about a kids cartoon…….who do they think they are ?
          http://www.theguardian.com/film/2014/mar/12/frozen-gay-propaganda-christian-pastor-colorado

        • gator69 says:

          One pastor Chris, on a radio show. Whose head did he chop off? Should we lock him up?

        • Chris Barron says:

          Pastor Kevin Swanson of the Reformation Church, who hosts Generations Radio, denounced the film as “very evil”, and that Disney was “one of the most pro-homosexual organisations in the country”.

          Swanson said: “You wonder sometimes if maybe there’s something very evil happening here … I wonder if people are thinking: ‘You know I think this cute little movie is going to indoctrinate my 5-year-old to be a lesbian or treat homosexuality or bestiality in a light sort of way.'”

          He also characterised Disney as a satanic company, saying: “If I was the Devil, what would I do to really foul up an entire social system and do something really, really, really evil to 5- and 6- and 7-year-olds in Christian families around America?… If I was the Devil, I would buy Disney in 1984.”

        • gator69 says:

          Should we lock him up? Cut his head off? Burn down his church?

        • Chris Barron says:

          Here is Swanson’s devil http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Eisner

          I think Pastor Swanson should live by what he stands for ….free speech.

        • gator69 says:

          What should we do to the pastor Chris? Cut his head off?

        • Chris Barron says:

          “Should we lock him up? Cut his head off? Burn down his church?”

          Lock him up. He requires to be medicated…..he uses the luxury of free speech against itself, a true enemy of freedom.

          He uses his right to call an organisation evil (comical I know, but go with it) for enjoying the right to free speech by writing films they want to write.

          Presuppositional apologetic
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presuppositional_apologetics

        • gator69 says:

          Gator: “Should we lock him up? Cut his head off? Burn down his church?”

          The Village Idiot says: Lock him up. He requires to be medicated…..he uses the luxury of free speech against itself, a true enemy of freedom.

          Lock him up with you? 😆

          You are clearly delusional too. You want to deny him of his free speech, so you are just as, if not more, nuts! 😆

          The Village Idiot says: You won’t see me telling Americans who they should vote for, not least of all because I think that representative voting is dumb and insults everybody’s intelligence….but maybe I will have to make an exception now…… you should vote for……….someone who doesn’t need to spend millions on campaigning to get you to vote for them.

          And thanks for another keeper! 😆

        • Chris Barron says:

          “You are clearly delusional too. You want to deny him of his free speech, ”

          I only want to remind him that unless he can’t let others express their right to free speech first, he can’t expect his right to be respected in turn….being fair, Disney didn’t call him up and ask him what he didn’t like

        • gator69 says:

          The Village idiot says: being fair, Disney didn’t call him up and ask him what he didn’t like

          Coming from you, that’s rich! 😆

        • Chris Barron says:

          You’re still leading the way but

        • gator69 says:

          What happened? Toes cramp up again? 😆

        • Chris Barron says:

          That reminds me to pull a couple of ingrown toenails out…they’ve been nagging recently and need to go

        • gator69 says:

          TMI Chris! 😆

          I’ve never had any addictions, so I cannot really recommend anything, but you really should see someone about your alcohol abuse.

        • Chris Barron says:

          Like a barman ?

        • gator69 says:

          The first step Chris, is to admit that you are stupid, and have a problem. Thankfully that has never been an issue for me.

        • Chris Barron says:

          As you’ve had no addictions anyway……

          Bring back Romney, eh ?

        • Chris Barron says:

          Come on…thats rule 5 again, as posted by your activist self
          http://www.bestofbeck.com/wp/activism/saul-alinskys-12-rules-for-radicals

          What was it about Romney that you liked so much ?

        • Chris Barron says:

          Ooops, thats rule 8 again
          http://www.nationalmemo.com/10-forgotten-scandals-surrounding-mitt-romney/

          Rule 7 is self evident now Gator

        • gator69 says:

          That’s OK drunkard, try squinting. 😆

          I wonder what diseases these kids get?

          This toxic lake poisons Chinese farmers, their children and their land. It is what’s left behind after making the magnets for Britain’s latest wind turbines… and, as a special Live investigation reveals, is merely one of a multitude of environmental sins committed in the name of our new green Jerusalem

          http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1350811/In-China-true-cost-Britains-clean-green-wind-power-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html#ixzz3Xnu93Gg1 ;

        • Chris Barron says:

          I cannot believe that this is what you wanted for a president
          http://www.nationalmemo.com/10-forgotten-scandals-surrounding-mitt-romney/

          I don’t support Obama (even if I wanted to i couldn’t) but nothing Obama does is particularly worse than what Romney would have done

          Isn’t hindsight a wonderful thing indeed 🙂

        • gator69 says:

          So you believe everything you read? 😆

          What about this, you should be convert to coal after reading…

          This toxic lake poisons Chinese farmers, their children and their land. It is what’s left behind after making the magnets for Britain’s latest wind turbines… and, as a special Live investigation reveals, is merely one of a multitude of environmental sins committed in the name of our new green Jerusalem

          http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1350811/In-China-true-cost-Britains-clean-green-wind-power-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html#ixzz3Xnu93Gg1 ;

  6. Les Johnson says:

    That is a first. I had never heard “censorship” called “good manners” before.

    • diogenese2 says:

      Ironically in 1967 (see picture above) the theatre was still censored by the Lord Chamberlain, who was very well mannered, but the “progressive” government of Harold Wilson applying his “white heat of technology” abolished this function allowing (the day after) the first London performance of “Hair”. A great show and |I still have the original (broadway) cast LP.

  7. I understand helping people and refugees….

    The UK however has destroyed its OWN culture…. we are doing the same here in America… what nation or people ever valued itself soooooo little… Muslims march in London chanting f_ck the Queen…. Kill the Queen… and they are Protected… not deported… and MORE are allowed to come in… meanwhile anyone who points this out or speaks to British Culture is labeled a racist and threatened with Jail…

    How backwards… And… its probably too late… Progressive Social Policy ruins great nations and their great culture…

    • Chris Barron says:

      “Muslims march in London chanting f_ck the Queen…. Kill the Queen… ”

      Many Brits birth shout it every day too (not me). but you need to understand that it is understood that the queen is really only a living metaphor for the reason Brits support the state…..or so we’re told.

      Ever since there was a royal family there has been healthy objection to the existence of royals and the institution. Many of those left to run away to the US….the hardcore stayed and do their best to this day.

      I don’t recall the last time I thought about the queen…..I suppose it must have been at Christmas when she comes on TV to deliver an annual speech……and i don’t remember the last time I heard anyone talking about the royals, unprovoked, usually it is only in response to stupid newspaper articles about what they’re getting upto.

      Muslims march in London chanting f_ck the Queen…. Kill the Queen…
      – it makes no difference to me….I know non muslims who would try to hatch a death plot if they thought they could get away with it !

  8. Robertv says:

    Dutch newspaper article

    http://www.telegraaf.nl/buitenland/23943990/__Kritiek_na_nieuwe_bootramp__.html

    International aid groups and Italian authorities have criticised Europe’s so-called “Triton” border protection operation as inadequate to tackle the scale of the problem.

    Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi called for an emergency summit of leaders from across Europe to discuss how to prevent further deaths of migrants in the Mediterranean.

    Of the 537 reactions 99% say more or less ‘We Don’t Want Them’ ‘Send Them Back Now’ .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s