Settled Science Means A 400% Discrepancy

Over the past 21 years, GISS is warming four times faster than the troposphere, where global warming is supposed to be occurring.

ScreenHunter_8873 May. 02 11.33

Climate experts rely on GISS data, because the best place to measure tropospheric CO2 warming is adjacent to 21 lanes of asphalt – like in Sydney.

ScreenHunter_3274 Oct. 03 05.07

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

29 Responses to Settled Science Means A 400% Discrepancy

  1. Jon Lonergan says:

    Those trees seem happy enough. Maybe we need more CO2?

    • MrX says:

      This is something the nutjobs won’t admit. This planet needs more CO2. Regardless of what blip increase we may be getting now, the planet is on a longterm trend of decreasing CO2 regardless of how much we pump into the atmosphere. If this longterm trend of decreased CO2 continues, the planet will be extinct of all living things. And these “scientists” want to reduce CO2? Boggles the mind.

      • AndyG55 says:

        Yep, and the continued de-sequestration of coal for energy, and limestone for cement, is probably one of the best ways to bring carbon back into the short-term, carbon LIFE-CYCLE.

    • richard says:

      as is the wildlife which is thriving in the- hotter than surrounding countryside – cities.

  2. omanuel says:

    Settled science is the politically correct was of conveying lies as truths.

    • omanuel says:

      Self-righteousness is the most evil form of selfishness.

      It allowed world leaders to take totalitarian control of humanity on 24 Oct 1945 in order to “SAVE THE WORLD FROM NUCLEAR ANNIHILATION!”

      To hide the fact that the weakest nuclear force in light atoms – neutron repulsion – becomes the dominant nuclear force in atoms, some planets, ordinary stars and galaxies heavier than ~150 amu (atomic mass units) . . .

      1. The Department of Energy (DOE) promotes Yukawa’s Standard Nuclear Model of an attractive force between neutrons and Dr. Carl von Weizsacker’s seriously flawed concept of “average nuclear binding energy” to hide neutron repulsion.

      2. NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) promotes the SSM (Standard Solar Model) of stars as H-fusion reactors and Big Bang Cosmology (BBC) of sudden creation of hydrogen (H) from nothing at the beginning of time (t = 0) to hide neutron repulsion as the driving force that causes the cores of heavy atoms, ordinary stars, galaxies and the universe itself to emit neutrons or fragment.

      The strongest nuclear force – the attraction between neutrons and protons – becomes relatively less important when Coulomb repulsion between protons causes the nucleus to rearrange at ~150 amu and neutron-proton pairs to be at the nuclear surface of atoms heavier than 150 amu.

    • omanuel says:

      Stalin’s Greatest Feat: Destroying the Scientific Revolution with the Church’s Help

      The scientific revolution began with Copernicus’ 1543 discovery the Sun rules the solar system; Earth is one of many planets orbiting the Sun. The Church said this was heresy, but Galileo defended himself at trial in 1633, noting the heliocentric solar system is the Divine Order other persistent observers could decipher.

      Stalin apparently won WWII during Aug-Sept 1945 events hidden from the public by a news blackout [1] and then united nations (UN) and national academies of sciences (NAS) on 24 Oct 1945 to hide NEUTRON REPULSIONthe powerful force of creation and destruction in cores of heavy atoms and ordinary stars from the public with three government-sponsored LIES [2]:

      1. Short-range attractive nuclear forces bind neutrons together
      2. Interstellar clouds of hydrogen form stars (H-fusion reactors)
      3. A Big Bang created hydrogen from nothing and started time

      Although an atheist himself, Stalin’s greatest feat was soliciting the Church’s help in ending the scientific revolution in 1945. Here is the proclamation that Pope Pius XII made to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on November 22, 1951 [3].

      Humanity was denied the promise in the last paragraph of Aston’s Nobel Lecture of 12 Dec 1922 because CHAOS and FEAR of nuclear annihilation during a news blackout in Aug-Sept 1945 [1] convinced world leaders to unite nations (UN) and national academies of science (NAS) on 24 Oct 1945 to forbid public knowledge of Neutron Repulsion – the source of energy that

      _ a.) Destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Aug 1945;
      _ b.) Created and sustains every atom and life [3]; and
      _ c.) The climate of every planet [4] in the solar system.

      In view of the above history of science and the Church, it is no surprise that the Church has recently joined the AGW bandwagon.


      1. “Aston’s warning (12 Dec 1922); CHAOS and FEAR (Aug-Sept 1945)

      2. “Solar energy,” Advances in Astronomy (submitted 1 Sept 2014) or
      “Solar Energy for school teachers”

      Click to access Supplement.pdf

      3. Pope Pius XII, “The proofs for the existence of God in the light of modern natural science,” An address to the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (22 Nov 1951)

      4. O. K. Manuel, Barry W. Ninham, Stig E. Friberg, “Superfluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate,” J. Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)

  3. Eric Simpson says:

    Well, the unbiased satellite data shows no rise in temperature, and the normal or cold temperatures everywhere that we experience ourselves shows that there’s been no rise, but the “adjusted” temperatures (by leftists with an agenda) shows a rise. Hmm, I wonder which is right?

    plus this: Snow, cold keep New England skiers, riders stoked into May. I’m going to replay this Hide the Decline video because at the start of the video a sign: “Global Warming Conference: Date May 1st (Today)” but there’s snow everywhere, and here reality seems to be converging with the Hide the Decline video!

  4. R. Shearer says:

    That explains the need to adjust temps upward. Now, if the sensors could just be placed into the asphalt in the middle of the road, then only a minor adjustment would be needed.

  5. An Inquirer says:

    It has years since I have heard discussion on greater warmth in troposphere than surface. Do alarmists now deny the relationship? Is the “greenhouse effect” now happening in a different way?

  6. Realist says:

    Fairbanks AK wasn’t buying into AGW dogma, so they kept moving the stations closer to the airport to get the readings they were looking for.

    • gregole says:

      “…Climate experts rely on GISS data, because the best place to measure tropospheric CO2 warming is adjacent to 21 lanes of asphalt – like in Sydney.

      Lends a whole new meaning to the expression, Cooking the books!

  7. SMS says:

    Has anyone explored the theory that CO2 is attracted to concrete and asphalt? Concrete and asphalt are magnets for CO2. Makes sense to me based on what I’m seeing. That’s the only way the current AGW theory can be valid because the only place where warming is being experienced is in urban settings. We can test this theory by comparing rural temperature sites to urban temperature sites. And sure enough, the urban sites are warmer. My theory is valid and must now be pushed onto all those who want the world to end tomorrow.

    Or, ………….government.climate scientists are FOS and the Earths climate sensitivity to CO2 is much less than they are trying to scare us with and they have some serious issues with UHI.

  8. darrylb says:

    For anyone following solar trends.
    We are in the tail end of a weak maunder maximum,
    —very quiet sun

    The AGW idiots are not recognizing a blessing when its given.
    to them
    1) The earth is up to 20% greener to date due to more CO2 food
    2) Many observations are indicating a possible long term cooling.
    If anything, any counter influence, if at all possible, would be a blessing

  9. AndyG55 says:

    Pierre finds massive adjustments in Maine temperature data.. happened some time between 2013 and 2015. (He’s having issues with blog software at the moment, so no comments possible)

  10. ren says:

    People in parts of the Northern Territory have experienced the coolest night of the year so far, with new record lows for April expected to be recorded in several places.

    At 6:00am (CST) the temperature at Middle Point, 66 kilometres south-west of Darwin, was down to 13.1 Celsius, making it the coldest April temperature ever recorded at the site.

    The temperature in Alice Springs was a chilly 1.7C overnight, making it the coolest night so far this year and fractionally above its coldest-ever recorded April temperature of 1.4C.

    Bureau of Meteorology acting senior forecaster Billy Lynch said he expected it would have been an April record in several parts of the Top End overnight.

    “It is just an indication that we are getting off to a really good start to the Dry Season,” Mr Lynch said.

    The low temperatures were also affecting Darwin, where it got down to 20.5C, making it the coolest night of the year so far.

    But the record low overnight at Middle Point was still above the coolest temperature ever recorded in Darwin, which was just 10.4C in July 1942.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s