Why Temperature Fraud Matters

‘Temperature data fraud from NOAA and NASA enables the global warming scam. It can’t exist without the fraudulent claims from these agencies.

For example

ScreenHunter_9144 May. 10 08.03

(CNN) New climate change records have come along to remind us that Earth’s thermostat is steadily pushing upward.
More exactly, there are two global high temperature records and a smattering of climate change low points.

March 2015 was the warmest March since record-keeping began in 1880, says the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. And the first quarter of 2015 was the warmest first quarter on record in those same 136 years.

New records highlight global warming’s continued rise – CNN.com

There isn’t one word of truth to this. March was about average and cooler than 1983

ScreenHunter_9143 May. 10 07.59vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/v6.0beta/tlt/uahncdc_lt_6.0beta2.txt

ScreenHunter_9145 May. 10 08.08rss_monthly_msu_amsu_channel_tlt_anomalies_land_and_ocean_v03_3.txt

January-March temperatures were nowhere near the warmest.

ScreenHunter_9147 May. 10 08.17

The April data shows a clear cooling trend this century, despite the current El Nino

ScreenHunter_9146 May. 10 08.11

The amount of sea ice on Earth is second highest on record. This is completely inconsistent with NOAA’s claims of record warm seas

 

ScreenHunter_9050 May. 08 07.08

Past years were much warmer than this year.

April1998v2015

 

The NOAA/NASA temperature data is fraudulent. It is essential to maintaining the climate scam.

Skeptics who pretend that the NOAA and NASA temperature record is somehow legitimate, enable this scam. They shouldn’t do that. Even NASA doesn’t believe their own data

GISS-1981-2002-2014-global

GISSUS19992014

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

17 Responses to Why Temperature Fraud Matters

  1. Mohatdebos says:

    Good time to start talking about warmth now that the winter is over in most of the continental U.S. Hard to convince even the true believers in Massachusetts that we have a global warming problem when they are buried under two feet of snow.

  2. Disillusioned says:

    Tony, again, thank you for continuing to highlight this. Some skeptics are avoiding it, for fear of soiling their reputations. When it becomes popular, the posers will be on board. We know the difference. Let us never forget.

    • omanuel says:

      Amen! Tony is the leader in exposing government fraud and sometime attacked from the rear by those who do not have the courage themselves to confront government fraud disguised as “consensus science”

  3. Kelvin Vaughan says:

    I think their computers have a cooling problem.

  4. omanuel says:

    Data manipulation to distort or falsify information by government-funded scientists threatens the very foundation of civilian control of government.

    The 1776 Declaration of Independence clearly states the right of citizens to create and/or destroy governments to ensure our safety and happiness. Governments that deceive the public destroy their sense of security and safety.

  5. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    Anyone that follows the published NASA & NOAA data quickly finds that it is driven by politics not science. As shown in these charts the plots jump around a lot — but there is one consistency and that is period prior to 1951 gets colder and the period after 1980 gets warmer. The period from 1951 to 1980 always stays the same at zero since that is the base and it can’t be allowed change. This is proof that the numbers are manipulated. since it is the only period that never changes.

    • Menicholas says:

      It changes a little, but not as much. 1960 seems to be the inflection point. After that, adjustments are upwards, before that, downwards.

  6. Eliza says:

    This is a crucial posting, because he is saying that many, if not most, of the skeptic sites are in fact promoting the scam without realizing it. (non-intentional) by quoting/repeating the “adjusted” data as being somehow legitimate. For example Lord Monckton ect keeps on using Hadcrut, GISS, NASA data in his graphs and we all know it basically manipulated/fraudulent data contorted to show warming. This practice by skeptics is actually helping the AGW case and needs to stop..

    • Menicholas says:

      The problem, Eliza, is that if one starts at the beginning and tries to work every part of the web of lies into every point one tries to make, it becomes cumbersome in the extreme to say anything. One must choose ones battles, and chip away wherever one can.
      I agree with what you are saying, but there are reasons.

      • Steve Case says:

        I agree, [off topic], but I use the now 3.3 mm/yr of sea level rise from Colorado University’s satellite data because it muddies the water if I start telling ’em at the same time that that’s B.S. too, which it is, but there’s other stuff going on that needs to be addressed. Opening a second argument at the same time is counter-productive.

  7. Eliza says:

    You should get Booker (The Telegraph) to see this posting.

  8. Tom Woods says:

    Nice to see CNN admit to the fraud, unwittingly.

    “New climate change records have come along to remind us that Earth’s thermostat is steadily pushing upward.”

    Exactly right. Someone IS, in fact, “steadily pushing upward” “Earth’s thermostat.” The temperature, on the other hand, not so much…

  9. Eric Barnes says:

    Thanks for all your hard work Tony.
    The luke-warmer positions are baffling. Perhaps they don’t want to kill the scientific goose that’s layed the golden eggs?
    The obsession with anomalies is the only way this thing lives. Hard facts on drought, heat waves, cold snaps, sea ice, etc. blows their positions out of the water.
    The luke-warmer position only enables a slide towards totalitarianism.

  10. exmaschine says:

    Reblogged this on The Road to Revelation and commented:
    “Temperature data fraud from NOAA and NASA enables the global warming scam. It can’t exist without the fraudulent claims from these agencies.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s