Another Smoking Gun Of Fraud At NASA

In 1974, the National Science Board (part of the National Science Foundation) said

During the last 20 to 30 years, world temperature has fallen, irregularly at first but more sharply over the last decade.

ScreenHunter_1849 May. 13 18.11

National Geographic : 1976 Nov, Page 580

NASA has completely erased this cooling, and now show a sharp warming from 1964 to 1974 – the exact opposite of what the National Science Board observed at the time.

Fig.A

NASA has dramatically altered their data over the last 30 years, to erase the cooling.

GISS-1981-2002-2014-global

This is a smoking gun of fraud, but Mosher and Zeke say it is top rate science.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Another Smoking Gun Of Fraud At NASA

  1. kbray in california says:

    And Norway’s environmental spin is over the top:

    http://www.environment.no/Topics/Climate/Norways-climate/Impacts-in-Norway/

  2. omanuel says:

    Fraud has increasingly become the most profitable form of research after frightened world leaders agreed to unite nations (UN) and national academies of science (NAS) on 24 Oct 1945 into an international Ministry of Scientific Truth, as George Orwell predicted in the book he started writing in 1946, “Nineteen Eighty-Four.”

    • omanuel says:

      The National Science Board and the National Academy of Sciences share responsibility with members of Congress and with federal research agencies like NASA, DOE, EPA, NSF, etc. for using public funds to deceive the public.

      That disheartening discovery led me:

      1. In 1976 to follow the money trail back to NAS (National Academy of Sciences) budget review of federal research agencies for Congress, regardless which political party (D or R) controlled Congress.

      2. In 2009 to recognize Climategate emails as a continuation of the battle in science to protect human liberty from government tyranny!

      It doesn’t matter whether the standard consensus science models of atoms, stars, cosmology and climate are right or wrong.

      What really matters is whether or not the NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES (a private, self-perpetuating group of individuals) directs public tax funds to federal research to deceive and enslave the public for a tyrannical government.

  3. BallBounces says:

    It’s really quite simple. The science isn’t what it used to be. And the science ain’t over until the fat lady’s singed.

  4. Bill S. says:

    OH – I think I’m about to step in it.
    Just who are these Mosher and Zeke people so as I can compare what they say to what you say and formulate an informed opinion? Mind you – that conscious that says I need to download data and look at it myself has been safely throttled.

  5. Eric Barnes says:

    The best science money can buy.

  6. Eric Simpson says:

    The Chicken Littles say that the temperatures keep rising and it has been the hottest years ever. We’ve been experiencing runaway hockey stick warming for decades. It hotter than hell. Right, then why are we having record cold and snow levels everywhere? The latest, Amgen was (is?) going to have there famous Amgen Tour Bicycle Race on Friday in the mountain resort of Big Bear Lake above San Bernardino. Amgen of course picked a date that in there wildest dreams they thought there would be no snow. But….

    5 to 9 inches of snow predicted to fall May 15th in Big Bear, the day of the Amgen bike race:

    http://www.sbsun.com/general-news/20150512/amgen-tour-to-go-on-at-big-bear-lake-despite-snowy-friday-forecast

    They say that the bike race is going to still go forward on Friday despite up to 9 inches of snow? Lol on that. From the Winter Weather Advisory link above: TIMING… THURSDAY EVENING THROUGH FRIDAY AFTERNOON. The race: Friday morning?

  7. ren says:

    El Niño.

  8. ren says:

    Sea Ice Concentration.

  9. “…Real world observations
    Are not your concern,
    We invent the truth for you,
    There’s nothing else to learn.

    So just follow Agenda 21,
    It’s our World governance plan,
    And repeat after us:
    “Climate is changed by man”….”

    Read more: http://wp.me/p3KQlH-EH

  10. wizzum says:

    All data needs to be given both with and without adjustments. The algorithm for adjustments also needs to be shown with arguments for the magnitude of said adjustments. This is the only way that theories can be tested and accepted as suitable.

    • Gail Combs says:

      We have been screaming about this for years. The response?

      “We have 25 or so years invested in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim is to try and find something wrong with it.” – Phil Jones the head of CRU.

      Steve McIntyre,
      May 30, 2008 at 9:08 AM
      …Peter Webster, like Hans von Storch before him, was nonplussed at this attitude and, at his request, I provided the supporting email in a comment on another thread, noting that von Storch, also in disbelief, had contacted Phli Jones directly for confirmation, obtaining such personal confirmation, which von Storch had then reported to the NAS panel, as I discussed here, linking to von Storch’s PPT.

      During the past few years, I’ve posted progress reports on CRU’s obstruction of efforts to find out even the simplest information about how they do their calculations – things as simple as a list of stations in their temperature calculations. These progress reports are scattered through many posts and I’ve collated into a PDF online here….
      http://climateaudit.org/2008/05/30/climate-scientists-should-think-about-data-quality-more-often-says-jones/

      The fact that this blatant disregard for the scientific method is brushed under the carpet and ignored or excused by so many ‘scientists’ tells you just how sad a state science is now in.

      True science has now been replaced with Lysenkoism and not just in one country but throughout the world.

      It is enough to make anyone who love science mad as Hades.

  11. Bill Illis says:

    Clive Best has just taken a run at the GHCN database. The Raw data from GHCN V1, for example, is very, very different than the current meteorological stations.

    Only about 0.65C of warming from 1880 to 2014 in the Raw record versus 1.2C in the current adjusted version.

    http://clivebest.com/blog/?p=6572

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s