The percentage of rainfall events over 5 cm has not changed at Lubbock, Texas – despite all of Katherine Hayhoe’s hysterical nonsense.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
- Toto Has Moved!
- Cooling Nuuk
- Escape The Heat At Your Local Movie Theater
- Charles Butler Interview – May 2, 2016
- Massive Greenland Fraud Is Rapidly Growing
- More Detail On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- 1995 IPCC Report Showed No Troposphere Warming From 1958 To 1995
- More On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- Climate Hustle Today
- On The Air Monday
- NOAA Quadrupling Radiosonde Temperatures By Data Tampering
- Skiing Is A Thing Of The Past
- Alarmist Brains Depleted Of Oxygen
- Climate Scam Being Driven By Politicians/Actors/Journalists
- 1905 : Valdez, Alaska Relocated Due To Glacial Melting
- Today’s Climate Fraud Winners – Science News
- Most Influential Climate Denier On Twitter
- SCIENCE : 230 Years Of Blaming White Men For Climate Change
- Battling Climate Misinformation In Santa Fe
- 1906 : Belief In Climate Change Is Due To Defective Memories
- Oswald’s Rifle?
- The Arctic Is Ice Free – How Can Sea Ice Be Declining?
- Climate Hustle Next Monday – One Night Only
- The Surface Temperature Record Is A Farce
- NASA – Doubling Sea Level Rise By Data Tampering
Join 1,961 other subscribers
Mann: How the hell did this data NOT get adjusted… Jones?? Jones??
Jones: I’m working on it now Michael…
Gavin: This Goddard guy is a pain in the a$$ … the Flat Earthers are alive on Twitter asking me about the Drought today… Drought despite all the Rain… Jones.. data manipulate us back into a Drought will ya?
Jones: Click [Enter] … there.. Rainfall is gone guys… record Drought is back!!
Steven, what say you on this Arctic Sea Ice Data/Graph:
Now suddenly they have data from 1910?
Would be interesting to see what pre-determined model they based their pre-satellite non-data on.
Seriously, they are just making stuff up, yet again.
That graph pegged my personal BS meter as soon as I saw it…
The documentation for this graph explains that the data and procedures to derive this graph are speculative and the authors understand that confidence cannot be placed on the information in this graph.