Climate Science Reaches A Tipping Point

Ahead of the Paris meeting, government climate scientists are now telling 100% lies, 100% of the time.

NASA/NOAA surface temperature data is massively diverging from more accurate satellite data.

ScreenHunter_2258 Jun. 05 09.17

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

ScreenHunter_2259 Jun. 05 09.29

Gavin complains about how bad the surface data is:

 We do not have direct measurements of the global mean anomaly, rather we have a large database of raw measurements at individual locations over a long period of time, but with an uneven spatial distribution, many missing data points, and a large number of non-climatic biases varying in time and space.

RealClimate: NOAA temperature record updates and the ‘hiatus’

So instead of correcting the surface data to match the more accurate satellite temperatures, government climate scientists are doing the exact opposite and altering the data to make it even worse.

ScreenHunter_2261 Jun. 05 09.47

There Is No Global Warming Hiatus After All | Science | Smithsonian

NASA has known for 25 years that satellite data is more accurate than surface data, but it gives the wrong political answer so they continue to ignore it. Why would the US space agency trust satellites?

B8YV6d7CEAA57DR

01 Apr 1990 – EARTHWEEK: A DIARY OF THE PLANET Global Warming

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

35 Responses to Climate Science Reaches A Tipping Point

  1. ozspeaksup says:

    best place to tip all the agw guff is in the bin!

  2. “Paris is a coming,
    And so are the lies,
    No warming pause,
    Now there’s a surprise!
    The weather recorded
    Doesn’t fit with the plan;
    Adjust temperature records,
    Keep blaming man….”
    Read more:
    http://rhymeafterrhyme.net/no-warming-pause-now-theres-a-surprise/

  3. KTM says:

    If you look at Figure 1 from Karl et al, they show the old error bars before the adjustments and then dashes to show the new error bars after the adjustments. The adjustments make the error bars LARGER, meaning they are making the already poor quality surface data even less precise.

    https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2015/06/figure-1.png?w=1050&h=893

  4. omanuel says:

    Regretfully, the climate scam will continue until we admit and correct the root problem:

    All physical sciences were sanitized and Stalinized after frightened world leaders united nations (UN) and national academies of science (NAS) into a giant, worldwide Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Science Truths on 24 Oct 1945.

    Four false consensus models hid our benevolent reality from humanity:

    1. The Standard Solar Model
    2. The Standard Nuclear Model
    3. The Big Bang Cosmology Model
    4. Anthropogenic Global Warming

    The real universe is remarkably simple and alive because . . .

    1. Rest mass (m) and energy (E) are reversible converted:

    _ a.) Rest mass (m) becomes energy; m => E as the universe expands

    _b.) Gravitational energy becomes rest mass as the cosmos collapses; E => m

    2. The universe consists entirely of two forms of only one fundamental particle:

    _ a.) The compacted electron-proton pair we call a neutron

    _ b.) The expanded electron-proton pair we call the hydrogen atom

    3. The free neutron has 0.08% more rest mass than the free hydrogen atom, and the neutron rest mass increases because of NEUTRON REPULSION when neutrons are confined to the cores of heavy atoms, some planets, ordinary stars and galaxies.

  5. flavrt says:

    New & Improved Data: So this time the science really is settled?

    It’s impossible to distinguish these gov reports from parody.

  6. darrylb says:

    I could have quoted the entire article this morning. Same names, same rhetoric.
    When I first say the name of lead author, Tom Karl, I knew the study was completely skewed
    and that it was akin to Michael Mann’s hockey stickey in general scientific integrity.
    Mann in an alarmist hero manner had to get rid of the medieval warm period. and the new hero, Karl, had to keep the warming ship alive

    In case anyone here has missed it. It was Karl who came up with the method of homogenization which are gallant host has documented many times, You know, cool the past, warm the present.
    I never could find where his methods were peer reviews. They just materilized

    The latest paper is really a gem, guaranteed to keep federal dollars flowing.
    As Kevin Trenberth stated in his well known 2009 document, ‘the fact is we cannot account for the lack of warming and it is a travesty that we can’t

    So the latest Karl gem, how did he do it?

    Well, first it is known that satellite and weather balloon temps have all shown a lack of warming
    and surface temperatures have basically done the same, except for when the sneaky method of raising and then raising again the temperatures in some areas.

    So lets look at sea surface temperatures. Oh no, the state of the art system which cost literally billions of dollars shows no warming. The argo float system, some 3.000 thousand deployed around the world, dive to various depths and surface to transmit their data to satellite (temperature as well as salinity) show no warming.

    What is a scientific fraud to do!? Hey, check out the the water intake channels of marine vessels.
    We know they were never designed for scientific use and we know it has been proven that there is heat contamination from the structure. Good Lord, we found something. Lets adjust the good and sound data from the buoys upward, the data from the well designed buoys, designed for scientific purposes. can be adjusted upwards to match the data from the heat contaminated marine vessel intake.

    Wow, that was close , and Paris is coming.

    But wait, we can infill the gaps in the Arctic to match the already homogenized and gap filled temperatures of surrounding land. So what if scientists whose specialty is the Arctic are laughing at how bizarre thaat is, the main stream media will buy it and that is what counts, Not the opinion of relevant scientists. We know that Trenberth, and Mann will chime in and support it.
    They are like Mikey, whey will eat, er ah say anything if it tastes like sweetened data.

    • Aphan says:

      You left out the fact that their newest and bestest effort, OCO 2 , stopped “collecting science” after only one report that indicated that the “experts” were wrong on many fronts. OCO 2 was supposed to be their Golden Goose. It was going to prove once and for all that AGW was going to kill us all. But it mysteriously only laid one egg and then crapped out. It seems that the more their technology advances, the more accurate the primitive data of the past becomes!

      • gnome says:

        I can understand CO2, and OCO, and even 6CO2 (+6H2O), but OCO 2 ???

        • Aphan says:

          OCO 2 is NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory, the #2 is because #1 failed to launch properly and crashed into the Indian Ocean. OCO 2 launched in July of 2014 and has so far only produced enough data for one report late last year. Silence since that one.

    • Billy Liar says:

      They are NOT using Argo data since they are talking using sea SURFACE temperatures which Argo floats do NOT measure. They are talking about the marine buoys which are used for gathering wave height data, surface wind etc. Unfortunately, these buoys are not singing the right song but a motley collection of data from all the worlds shipping, using uncalibrated thermometers in ships engine room intakes (at varying depths to boot) DOES sing the right tune so the temperatures from the calibrated buoy data have been increased by 0.12°C to match the ship data.

      Would we expect anything less from the church of climatology?

  7. darrylb says:

    Nuts, I wish I would proof read, before I post, Just too anxious to get the above out.
    I always type are for our.and more glitches, but I trust you will get the idea.

  8. Don says:

    The homogenization at work.

  9. Eric Simpson says:

    “climate change” is bullshit

    • omanuel says:

      Climate change is real for planet Earth – located exactly 1 AU (one astronomical unit) from the pulsar that made the elements and birthed the solar system five billion years (5 Ga) ago.

      But climate change for the planets is controlled by the pulsar that world leaders agreed to hide from the public after nations and government science were Stalinized” on 24 Oct 1945.

  10. Ted says:

    The whole hockey team has, at one time or another, mentioned the failure of temperatures to rise. They wasted billions of dollars trying to justify their ridiculous claim that the data has been wrong. NOAA just proved that the data was always right. The problem is that deniers like Gavin and Mikey have been lying to us about it for the last 20 years. We need to look into their funding, and find out which oil companies have been paying them to deny the runaway warming we’ve seen in this century.

  11. Eric Simpson says:

    Proof of their leftist designs are in their own words…

    The Daily Caller article on the NOAA manipulations: NOAA Fiddles With Climate Data To Erase The 15-Year Global Warming ‘Hiatus’: http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/04/noaa-fiddles-with-climate-data-to-erase-the-15-year-global-warming-hiatus/

    An excerpt:

    Scientists and climate experts skeptical of man-made global warming have become increasingly critical of temperature adjustments made by government climate agencies like NASA and NOAA. Skeptics charge that agencies like NOAA have been tampering with past temperatures to make the warming trend look much more severe..

    But there’s no warming trend. So how could they make that look more severe? Instead we have a 15 to 20 year flat-line, and before that, evidence in the US, and likely the globe, suggest that the 1930s were *hotter* than today. That means… a cooling trend. Long term.

    And they should amend the line (amendment bolded) in the above excerpt to read: temperature adjustments made by leftist dominated government climate agencies like NASA and NOAA.

    Yes, leftist dominated, and that makes all the difference in the world, because these extreme leftists have with surprising explicitness stated publicly that their goal has nothing to do with the truth nor their boogy man the climate. Proof is in the pudding; well, proof is in their own words:

    “We have wished, we ecofreaks, for a disaster… to bomb us into the stone age, where we might live like Indians.” -Stewart Brand, Whole Earth Catalogue
    “Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” -ex UNEP Director Marice Strong [considered the pioneering founder of the global warming scare]
    “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing.” -leftist Senator Tim Wirth, 1993
    “It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true.” -Paul Watson, Co-Founder of Greenpeace
    “We have to offer up scary scenarios… each of us has to decide the right balance between being effective and being honest.” -Stephen Schneider, lead ipcc author, 1989
    “[we will likely see] the oceans begin to boil, and we will have a runaway greenhouse effect.” -James Hansen, NASA
    “A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States.” -John Holdren (1973), Obama’s current Science Czar
    “A billion people could die from global warming by 2020.” -John Holdren 1986
    “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that .. global warming would fit the bill. It does not matter if this common enemy is a real one or one invented for the purpose.” -Club of Rome
    “Unless we announce disasters no one will listen.” -Sir John Houghton, first ipcc chair
    “Entire nations could be wiped off the face of the Earth by rising sea levels if the global warming trend is not reversed by the year 2000.” -Noel Brown, ex UNEP Director, 1989
    “The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe.” -Daniel Botkin, ex Chair of Environmental Studies, UCSB
    “[Inaction will cause]… by the turn of the century [2000], an ecological catastrophe which will witness devastation as complete, as irreversible as any nuclear holocaust.” -Mustafa Tolba, 1982, former Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Program
    “By 1995 somewhere between 75 and 85 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.” -(leftist) Senator Gaylord Nelson, 1970

    For decades the leftist fear mongers have been saying that they should make up (fabricate) admittedly dishonest “scary scenarios.” It’s pure complete total baloney. Someday these Bullshit Artists are going to have to pay the piper as the bs scary scenarios that they keep regurgitating NEVER materialize. Never. There fabricated fanciful scary scenarios always turn out to be not even anywhere close to reality, just misses the mark completely. Yet oddly no one seems to bat an eye. It’s the same as it’s ever been.

    Oh, and one other thing, there’s zero evidence that CO2 actually has anything to do with climate temperatures: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WK_WyvfcJyg&info=GGWarmingSwindle_CO2Lag

  12. Winnipeg Boy says:

    This from Politifact:
    “Our ruling
    (Don) Zimmerman said that as every child learns, the sun warms the Earth—and, he said, carbon dioxide does not.
    We remember: The sun warms the Earth. But Zimmerman’s bigger point–discounting the role of carbon dioxide in climate change–disregards international scientific consensus.
    We rate this claim Mostly False.”

    So the sun doesn’t warm the earth?

    Key quote: disregards international scientific consensus. – Yup.
    This is what people read and then they move on, one more shot of flavor-aid down their throat.

  13. SMS says:

    Australia’s ski areas experiencing earliest snowfall since 2000. NOAA and GISS are in the process of moving the month of June to later in the calendar year in order to maintain the myth of CAGW.

  14. spren says:

    What is astounding to me is that I can’t conceive of any other area of science, or just about any endeavor for that matter, in which the results from the past could be altered at will. I’ve never seen anything like it. And they can provide their justifications with a straight face while saying it. They make Enron look like a rank amateur in how they projected expenses into assets. Just go back and change whatever you need to change to match your latest financial reports. Wow.

    • Jason Calley says:

      “They make Enron look like a rank amateur in how they projected expenses into assets.”

      Well, there’s more money involved…

    • Ted says:

      But you’re wrong, Spren. Climate data can’t be altered at will. It can only be altered in one direction. Typically, that direction is down until the late 70’s, and up after that.

      Perhaps more disturbing is that they’ve ALREADY altered the FUTURE data. Their algorithms literally define current temperature measurement techniques as substandard, requiring the large majority to be adjusted upward before they’re even looked at.

      • rah says:

        The good thing is that there are a whole lot of people that don’t give a crap because they live in self absorbed ignorance and more that are aware but don’t care what the “data” says because the day to day, month to month, and season to season weather they are experiencing falls well within what they have seen during their life times.

        What I’m waiting for is any of the prophets of doom to point to specific and obvious physical signs that man is significantly changing the global climate and the results of that. I’m talking, REAL evidence of human caused global climate change. Show me the predictions of substantive change or disaster that have come about AFTER they were predicted.

        Anyone have any of those examples?

  15. Elaine Supkis says:

    At WUWT, where they attacked this site endlessly about temperature data tampering charges, now assumes that this tampering is going on all the time now while not apologizing to the host here for his hard work.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s