Another Smoking Gun Of Incompetence By Climate Scientists

In 1940 scientists reported 10 degrees Arctic warming, and a reduction in polar ice thickness.

ScreenHunter_9809 Jun. 27 07.52

31 May 1947 – TEMPERATURES RISING IN ARCTIC REGION LOS ANGELES…

ScreenHunter_9807 Jun. 27 01.33

23 Feb 1940 – THE NORTH POLE. Is it Getting Warmer. | BUNDABER…

In 2000, climate scientists a similar warming and ice loss, indicating that Arctic climate is cyclical.

August 29, 2000

The end of the cold war, for instance, has brought to light important sonar measurements of Arctic ice collected by United States Navy submarines. They are being analyzed by Dr. Drew Rothrock at the Applied Physics Laboratory of the University of Washington in Seattle. By comparing measurements of ice thickness between 1958 and 1976 with data from 1993 and 1997, he determined that the thickness had decreased from 10.2 feet in the early period to 5.9 feet in the 1990’s.

In reporting that parts of Alaska and northern Eurasia had warmed by nearly 11 degrees in winter months the past 30 years, Dr. Serreze observed, ”We have climate evidence from the past four centuries gleaned from ice cores, lake cores and tree rings that don’t show nearly as dramatic warming, putting the modern record into context

Open Water at Pole Is Not Surprising, Experts Say – NYTimes.com

PIOMAS conservatively reports 5.6 feet in 2012 and 6.2 feet in 2015. The Navy reports much greater thicknesses.

Bpiomas_plot_daily_heff.2sst (8)

Bpiomas_plot_daily_heff.2sst.png (2488×1960)

Plotting the data out, what becomes clear is that the Arctic is cyclical.

ScreenHunter_9811 Jun. 27 08.02

This cooling and increase in ice was reported by scientists at the time

ScreenHunter_9812 Jun. 27 08.10

ScreenHunter_9813 Jun. 27 08.11

16 May 1974 – LIFE STYLE TAKING POINT Disappearance revives lo…

ScreenHunter_393 May. 21 04.35

NCAR  newsweek_coolingworld.pdfScreenHunter_394 May. 21 04.37

National Academy Of Sciences  Science News

So how did NASA deal with this cyclical behavior and post 1940’s cooling? They simply made it disappear.

ReykjavikGISS2012-2013

Fig.A (3)

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Another Smoking Gun Of Incompetence By Climate Scientists

  1. Chuck L says:

    Alarmists are starting to claim that their “best friend,” PIOMAS, is inaccurate since it no longer supports their claims of an “Arctic Death Spiral.” It is hard to find a more dishonest and despicable group of people.

    • PIOMAS is probably under a lot of pressure to adjust… to homogenize… they must have measured wrong in the past, despite being in the Arctic Circle… need some bearded Professor with an Excel Spreadsheet to correct this data… LOL!!

  2. Andy DC says:

    We definitely had a modern “Little Ice Age” between 1940 and 1980. Washington, DC’s “normal” high temperature in January dropped about 2F degrees during that period. For NOAA to deny that obvious drop in temperature is to deny their very own data set.

    Idiot environmentalist wackos like Bobby Kennedy, Jr. love to talk about how snowy the 1960’s were compared to recent winters. What he conveniently “forgets” to mention is that the 1960’s were also far snowier than earlier decades as well.

  3. omanuel says:

    Incompetent or Criminal?

    If the conclusions of this paper [1] are correct, as strongly suggested by nine pages of precise experimental data and thousands of precise experimental data points they represent, . . .

    then the Pontifical Academy of Sciences is as guiltily as other National Academies of Sciences (NAS) worldwide in deceiving the public about the source of energy that:

    1. Made our chemical elements
    2. Birthed the solar system 5 Ga ago
    3. Sustained the origin and evolution of life on Earth after ~3.8 Ga ago, and
    4. Still sustains every atom, life and planet in the Solar System today . . .

    the same fountain of energy that Copernicus reported at the gravitational center of the solar system in 1543.

    Reference:

    1. Oliver K. Manuel, “Solar energy,” Advances in Astronomy, submitted 1 Sept 2014, privately published 17 Mar 2015): https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy.pdf

  4. cfgj says:

    Cryosat-2 trumps models.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s