Models Predicted Peak Sea Ice Loss In Antarctica

Climate experts claim that they predicted Antarctic sea ice gains, because they are paid propagandists who are incapable of telling the truth about anything.

In 1984, Hansen predicted peak sea ice loss in the Weddell Sea of of Antarctica, right where the peak gain has occurred.

ScreenHunter_8571 Apr. 13 05.56ScreenHunter_8569 Apr. 13 05.52

Hansen’s forecast was 100% inverted from what actually happened..

ScreenHunter_8570 Apr. 13 05.54

S_daily_extent.png (420×500)

Earth has the same amount of sea ice as it did when Hansen made that forecast in 1984 (7) (512×412)

There is not one shred of evidence backing up the climate scam, so experts have resorted to lying and fabricating data.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to Models Predicted Peak Sea Ice Loss In Antarctica

  1. gator69 says:

    Frauds only recant when faced with immenent and severe punishment, and only in hopes of avoiding immenent and severe punishment.

  2. emsnews says:

    Too much money for lies.

  3. omanuel says:

    Yes, Tony aka Steven, paid propagandists threaten the survival of humanity because INSANITY IS Lack of Contact with Reality !

    After WWII nations and national academies of science were united into a giant, worldwide Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Scientific (UN)Truths on 24 Oct 1945 to prohibit public knowledge of NEUTRON REPULSION – the source of energy in cores of galaxies, ordinary stars, some planets and all atoms heavier than ~150 amu (atomic mass units), including atoms of uranium and plutonium that vaporized Hiroshima and Nagasaki and mentally crippled leaders of nations and national academies of science with fear-based insanity (loss of contact with reality).

    Click to access Introduction.pdf

    AGW is only one of four major Nobel Prize-winning falsehoods disguised as consensus science after Joseph Stalin emerged victorious from WWII and united nations (UN) and national academies of science (NAS) into a giant, worldwide Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Scientific (UN)Truths!

    1. Anthropologic Global Warming
    2. Standard Nuclear Model
    3. Standard Solar Model
    4. Big Bang Cosmology

    These falsehoods are designed to hide NEUTRON REPULSION – the source of energy used to power the cosmos, the Sun and to endow mankind with inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

    Loss of contact with reality threatens the ability of humanity to survive and prosper 1AU (astronomical unit) from the pulsar-centered star that sustains our lives.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Government Drones (bureaucrats) are completely protected from reality. When the drone to producer ratio gets too large drones produce too much strangling red tape tojustify their existence and to expand. their power. As the bureaucracy continues to expand it require too much tax revenue from the ever reducing economy to sustain the state.

      As E. M. Smith said

      …That’s the problem of being on the wrong side of the Laffer Curve. Economies shrink, corruption and black markets (and DIY) expand. Layering “austerity” onto an economy on that side of things just drives the equation MORE toward DIY, black markets, and shrink. “Exactly wrong” results. The only really effective way out is to make the public market as free and fair as the black market and cut the “take” for “intermediaries” to a very modest level (about 20% max is where it starts to be sub-optimal). Anything else is a circular firing squad…

      Unfortunately the greedy b@$tards in the EU, UN, WTO and national governments want to make the ‘circular firing squad’ worldwide just as the earth is about to cool down and agricultural productivity slacks off.
      the 1974 CIA report “A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems” has a more realistic assessment

      The archaeologists and climatotologists document a rather grim history… There is considerable evidence that these empires may not have been undone by barbarian invaders but by climatic change…. has tied several of these declines to specific global cool periods, major and minor, that affected global atmospheric circulation and brought wave upon wave of drought to formerly rich agricultural lands.

      Refugees from these collapsing civilizations were often able to migrate to better lands… This would be of little comfort however,… The world is too densely populated and politically divided to accommodate mass migration….

      The climate of the 1800s was far less favorable for agriculture in most areas of the world. In the United States during that century, the midwest grain-producing areas were cooler and wetter and snow lines of the Russian steppes lasted for longer periods of time. More extended periods of drought were noted in the areas of the Soviet Union now known as the new lands. More extensive monsoon failures were common around the world, affecting in particular China, the Philippines and the Indian Subcontinent.

      The Wisconsin analysis questions whether a return to these climate conditions could support a population that has grown from 1.1 billion in 1850 to 3.75 billion in 1970. The Wisconsin group predicted that the climate could not support the world’s population since technology offers no immediate solution. Further world grain reserves currently amount to less than one month; thus any delay in supplies implies mass starvation. They also contended that new crop strains could not be developed over night… Moreover they observed that agriculture would become even more energy dependent in a world of declining resources.

      This Study published in 2008 by the Army War College is badly infected with CAGW and Globalization but at least sees some of the problems.

      From the New Middle Ages to a New Dark Age: The Decline of the State and U.S. Strategy


      Security and stability in the 21st century have little to do with traditional power politics, military conflict between states, and issues of grand strategy. Instead, they revolve around governance, public safety, inequality, urbanization, violent nonstate actors, and the disruptive consequences of globalization. This monograph seeks to explore the implications of these issues for the future U.S. role in the world, as well as for its military posture and strategy.

      Underlying the change from traditional geopolitics to security as a governance issue is the long-term decline of the state. Despite state resilience, this trend could prove unstoppable. If so, it will be essential to replace dominant state-centric perceptions and assessments (what the author terms ?stateocentrism?) with alternative judgments acknowledging the reduced role and diminished effectiveness of states. This alternative assessment has been articulated most effectively in the notion of the New Middle Ages in which the state is only one of many actors, and the forces of disorder loom large. The concept of the New Middle Ages is discussed in Section II, which suggests that global politics are now characterized by fragmented political authority, overlapping jurisdictions, no-go zones, identity politics, and contested property rights.

      Failure to manage the forces of global disorder, however, could lead to something even more forbidding?a New Dark Age. Accordingly, Section III identifies and elucidates key developments that are not only feeding into the long-term decline of the state but seem likely to create a major crisis of governance that could tip into the chaos of a New Dark Age. Particular attention is given to the inability of states to meet the needs of their citizens, the persistence of alternative loyalties, the rise of transnational actors, urbanization and the emergence of alternatively governed spaces, and porous borders. These factors are likely to interact in ways that could lead to an abrupt, nonlinear shift from the New Middle Ages to the New Dark Age. This will be characterized by the spread of disorder from the zone of weak states and feral cities in the developing world to the countries of the developed world. When one adds the strains coming from global warming and environmental degradation, the diminution of cheaply available natural resources, and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, the challenges will be formidable and perhaps overwhelming….

      Given ISIS, the slow motion collapse of the EU into bankruptcy, the collapse of the Chinese stock market, you would think it is time to do a re-think. Instead the Bureaucratic Drones are doubling down and pushing failed policies even harder.

      I am just hoping a nuclear war is off the table but with North Korea and Russia getting cosy and the USA and EU ticking off Putin you have to wonder.

    • omanuel says:


      I share your concerns, but near the end of life I have developed a childlike faith that a benevolent Higher Power has kept humanity from self-destruction over my entire life.

      E.g., Stalin’s planed expansion of the boarder of the old USSR was frustrated, in part, by the decisions of

      1. My research mentor, the late Professor of Nuclear Geo-chemistry at the Imperial University of Tokyo, Paul Kazuo Kuroda, to:

      _ a.) Risk his life by retaining secret possession of Japan’s atomic bomb design for fifty-seven years:

      _ b.) Assign research projects in 1960 to reveal Stalin’s devastation of post-WWII science, “The origin of the solar system and its elements.”

      2. The very talented astrophysicist and cosmologist, Sir Fred Hoyle, exposed in his 1994 autobiography how the internal composition of the Sun was abruptly and irrationally changed from:

      _ c. Mostly iron (Fe) in 1945 to
      _ d. Mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946

  4. rah says:

    i wonder! Has a single prediction of what would occur due to increasing CO2 that Hanson made during his time at GISS ever come to pass or even look like it will during our lifetimes?

    • omanuel says:

      By a strange coincidence, the Climategate emails that surfaced in late Nov 2009 have now made us aware that world governments and national academies of science have used science as a tool of propaganda to maintain Orwellian control of the public since nations were united on 24 OCT 1945.

      What a strange coincidence!

  5. Steve Case says:

    There is not one shred of evidence backing up the climate scam, so experts have resorted to lying and fabricating data.

    When you apply the “Duck Test” that’s exactly what it looks like.

    • omanuel says:

      Every lie (fable) that we accepted as truth increased the likelihood that another lie would be forthcoming. E.g.,

      Consensus Fable: Reality

      1. AGW Fable: The fountain of energy Copernicus reported in 1543 at the gravitational center of the solar system provides heat and light and obviously controls the climate of every planet in the Solar System.

      2. SNM Fable: The nucleus (core) of heavy atoms like uranium and plutonium fission (fragment, explode) because neutrons repel other neutrons.

      3. SSM Fable: The Sun and other ordinary stars make hydrogen (H) and discard hydrogen (H) to interstellar space in the solar wind.

      4. BBC Fable: The universe is expanding and entropy is increasing as compressed electron/proton pairs (neutrons) decay into expanded electron/proton pairs (H atoms).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s