As CO2 Increases, Atmospheric Temperatures Aren’t

Atmospheric CO2 has been increasing, and atmospheric temperatures haven’t. The global warming scam is dead scientifically, and is now maintained 100% by corruption and perversion of science.

ScreenHunter_9920 Jul. 12 13.59ESRL Global Monitoring Division – Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network ScreenHunter_9919 Jul. 12 13.55 Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

The scam is now very heavily dependent on fraudsters at NASA and NOAA tampering with surface data, to create the appearance of non-existent warming. The most disgusting and lowest form of scientific behavior.


If the planet was actually warming, sea ice would be disappearing – but it isn’t. Earth has the same amount of sea ice as it had 35 years ago. (8) (512×412)

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

27 Responses to As CO2 Increases, Atmospheric Temperatures Aren’t

  1. Climatism says:

    Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
    Great post. Sums up the climate scam in 3 paragraphs. Nice.

  2. gator69 says:

    Only government science has lead to ovens for cooking humans…

    They also silenced dissent.

    • gator69 says:


    • omanuel says:

      Not Hitler, but Hitler’s twin in the USSR.

      • gator69 says:

        Yes Hitler. Quit trying to segue into your spam. The book is about Hiler’s use of scientists to pervert science. Maybe you should read it.

      • omanuel says:

        You may be right, gator69, but I believe it was Stalin that survived WWII and perverted western science to try to hide NEUTRON REPULSION in cores of

        1. All atoms heavier than 150 amu
        2. Some planets like Jupiter
        3. Ordinary stars like the Sun
        4. Galaxies like the Milky Way, and
        5. The Universe expanding and filling interstellar space with hydrogen (H)

      • omanuel says:

        You may be right, gator69, but I believe it was Stalin that survived WWII and perverted western science to try to hide NEUTRON REPULSION in cores of the uranium and plutonium that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

        • gator69 says:

          Oliver, Slow down the spam fest. You hijack everyone’s comments with your spam-a-licious segues umpteen times per day. Try a new tune once in a while.

      • omanuel says:

        In fact, the theoretical nuclear physicists advising Hitler’s atomic bomb project, Dr. Carl von Weizsacker, may have been an agent of Stalin. Weizsacker’s nuclear binding energy equation obscures the source of energy that causes heavy atoms to fission – NEUTRON REPULSION – and exaggerates repulsive forces between protons.

        • gator69 says:

          Next time you want to comment about something related to your iron sun, count to ten, and then reconsider. Surely you have something else you can add to the discussion.

        • AndyG55 says:

          Yes, enough is enough.

          On topic in future please.

          Its getting boring and annoying, and not winning too many to your ideas.

          COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE would be the word I would use.

        • AndyG55 says:

          ps…. its well past the stage where most people just skip your posts, so even if you do have something to add to the discussion at hand, nobody will notice.

        • Ted says:

          I’m with Andy on this. I like you, Oliver. You’re intelligent, and you’ve made some solid contributions on here. I even think you’re probably on to something with your solar arguments. But when I see more than a sentence or two from you, I find myself just skipping the whole thing, assuming I’ve read it a hundred times before. It doesn’t bother me any, or offend me. It just makes me more likely to jump to the next comment.

          Perhaps a good compromise would be a single line description, and a link, at the end of each of your posts. Like a signature. It gets the message out to the infrequent readers, but it doesn’t encourage the regulars to skip over your posts.

          Just my 2 cents.

  3. markstoval says:

    “The most disgusting and lowest form of scientific behavior.”

    I would say that it is the most disgusting and lowest form of behavior by those who claim to be doing science. I don’t think the fraudsters are engaged in “scientific behavior”. It is more of a con game or a cult thing — can’t decide which one.

    ~ Mark

    • gator69 says:

      Before we come to class and Range the Sciences, ’tis proper we should sift the merits of Knowledge, or clear it of the Disgrace brought upon it by Ignorance, wether disguised as (1.) the Zeal of the Divines, (2.) the Arrogance of Politicians, or (3.) the Errors of Men of Letters.
      -Sir Francis Bacon, “Advancement of Learning”, 1605 (Father of the Scientific Method)

    • omanuel says:


      The con game started when Stalin emerged victorious from WWII after a news blackout of events in Aug-Sept 1945 left Stalin in secret possession of

      1. Japan’s atomic bomb plant at Konan, Korea, and
      2. The American crew of a B29 bomber he held for negotiations to . . .

      unite nations (UN) and national academies of science (NAS) into a giant, worldwide “Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Scientific (UN)Truths” on 24 Oct 1945.

  4. cfgj says:

    The seas are warming up….never forget!

    • gator69 says:

      Where are the seas warming up, and by how much? Did you hit your head? We have covered this several times before.

      An idiot, dolt, dullard or (archaically) mome is an intellectually disabled person, or someone who acts in a self-defeating or significantly counterproductive way. The similar terms moron, imbecile, and cretin have all gained specialized meanings in modern times. An idiot is said to be idiotic, and to suffer from idiocy. A dunce is an idiot who is specifically incapable of learning.

    • Hey cf, do you remember before, when I told you that the greenhouse effect warms the atmosphere? Not the seas, the atmosphere? So why are you still here talking about the seas warming? I had a dog once who was untrainable. Worthless idiotic mutt, don’t tell me you are the same way.

  5. AndyG55 says:

    Modelled at 0.003C per year or something like that, from massively dispersed irregular data.

    So small they have to work in Joules.


    • Jason Calley says:

      I once left a comment at (I think it was…) Climate Progress, pointing out that the massive warming of 24 X 10^22 joules only worked out to be less than a tenth of a degree spread over a half century. Their response was that “there are always ways of making a really large number look small!”

      That response indicates a level of anti-science which boggles the mind.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s