Most of the climate science community has confirmed that last week’s breaking study suggesting a coming freeze like nothing we’ve seen since the 17th century will account for little more than a blip on the climate radar.
These criminals have no idea what “most of the climate science community” believes. They are making up lies in support of their agenda.
A spokesperson for the EPA told The Daily Beast that “Major climate science assessments such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Chapter 188.8.131.52), have stated that any cooling from a solar minimum would be much smaller in magnitude than projected warming due to increased greenhouse gases in our atmosphere.”
The IPCC has absolutely no clue what a solar minimum might do to the climate.
The now infamous Maunder Minimum, which saw the likes of the Thames in London freezing over, had little to do with solar activity.
These criminals make claims like this, without any basis or alternative theory for what caused the cold during the Maunder minimum.
Dr. John Harte, who holds a joint professorship in the Energy and Resources Group and the Ecosystem Sciences Division of the College of Natural Resources at UC Berkeley, says it’s just not possible: “There’s just nothing in solar physics that tells us there’s a plausible mechanism for a change in solar output on the scale of, say, three degrees Celsius.”
Three degrees Celsius? These criminals simply make numbers up in support of their agenda. So far this century, troposphere temperatures have declined.
These people believe they can lie with impunity. I say their time for doing this is running out.