Shameless Scamsters

ScreenHunter_235 Jul. 20 16.02

The climate criminals cool the past, and warm the present. Then they make claims about record heat. Intellectual filth of the very worst kind.

giss-1981-2002-2014-global

.The surface temperature record looks nothing like it did 40 years ago.

ScreenHunter_236 Jul. 20 16.06

And the surface temperature record looks nothing like the more accurate satellite record.

ScreenHunter_237 Jul. 20 16.29

Make no mistake about it. You are witnessing the biggest criminal fraud in history, and it is being directed from the White House.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Shameless Scamsters

  1. omanuel says:

    Shameless Scamsters have been operating government research agencies since Stalin emerged victorious from WWII and united nations (UN) and national academies of science (NAS) into an “Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Science (UN)Truths” on 24 Oct 1945.

    Here’s How Local Element Synthesis Was Hidden From the Public For Forty-Three Years

    1972: Here are the experimental data that showed the presence of “strange xenon” (Xe-2) from synthesis of the chemical elements just before the primitive meteorites formed [Hennecke, Sabu & Manuel, Nature 240 (1972) 99-101 http://www.omatumr.com/archive/XenonInCarbonaceousChondrites.pdf

    http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1972Data.htm

    1975: Here are experimental data from the Allende meteorite showing that all primordial helium accompanied “strange xenon” (Xe-2) in the Allende meteorite and no primordial helium was associated with “normal xenon” (Xe-1) in the Allende meteorite.

    http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1975Data.htm

    1977: Here is a debate published in Science to decide if “strange xenon” (Xe-2) was produced by:

    _ a.) A supernova explosion of the Sun
    _ b.) Fission of a superheavy element

    “Strange xenon, extinct superheavy elements, and the solar neutrino puzzle,” Science (14 January 1977)

    Click to access StrangeXenon.pdf

    The University of Chicago scientists finally admitted superheavy element fission was not the correct answer in 1980s, and in . . .

    1983: We predicted the Galileo probe of Jupiter would observe “strange xenon” (Xe-2) there, confirming local element synthesis and the iron-rich Sun [“Solar abundances of the elements,” Meteoritics 18, 209-222 (1983) http://tinyurl.com/224kz4

    1995: Here are experimental data from the Galileo probe of Jupiter’s helium-rich atmosphere showing “strange xenon” (Xe-2) in Jupiter.

    http://www.omatumr.com/Data/1998Data.htm

    1998: NASA retained the Galileo data until 1998, when the NASA Administrator was confronted while he being video recorded by CSPAN news. See Dr. Goldin’s live explanation for holding the Jupiter xenon data near the end of this 1998 video.

  2. gator69 says:

    Anomaliezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz….

  3. MrX says:

    My response to Seth would be:

    And if I were allowed to manipulate lottery numbers, I’d never lose. What’s your point?

  4. Andy DC says:

    Adjust the data to fit the hypothesis, then claim the data proves the hypothesis. You would think a five year old could see through that.

  5. Climatism says:

    Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
    “Make no mistake about it. You are witnessing the biggest criminal fraud in history,”

    Indeed, sadly, we are.

  6. They’ve got themselves in a hole
    And they need to stop digging,
    The data recordings
    They need to stop rigging,
    A return to honest science
    Is urgently needed,
    But are they too radicalised
    For that call to be heeded?

    http://rhymeafterrhyme.net/real-world-observations-a-threat-to-us-all/

    • AndyG55 says:

      We seem to have finished the small climb out of the LIA..

      The world needs more REAL warming.. not more fabricated warming. !!

  7. rah says:

    Someone that is more knowledgeable about the players will have to tell me if Dr. Jeff McMasters is legit. The article seems moderate in tone but still holds that tropical storms will become less frequent but large storms will be stronger. What bothers me about it is this statement:
    “Why fewer storms, but the strongest ones getting stronger?”

    Would not all storms that form on average be stronger? How can only large storms be stronger?

    http://classic.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=3052

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s