A Spectacular Hockey Stick Of Fraud With NASA Surface Temperatures Since 2001

In 2001, NASA reported 0.5C warming from 1880 to 2000, with an error bar of less than 0.2C.

Fig.A_20010501

http://www.giss.nasa.gov/data/update/gistemp/graphs/Fig.A.ps

 Now they show 1.3C warming during that same time interval, an increase of 0.8C, and nearly tripling the amount of warming.  The changes they have made are 400% of the size of their 2001 error bars – a smoking gun of fraud.

Fig.A_20150829

Fig.A.gif (656×446)

This fraud was accomplished via a mind-boggling hockey stick of data tampering.

ScreenHunter_10234 Aug. 29 17.14

2015 version : data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.A.txt

2001 version : giss.nasa.gov/data/update/gistemp/graphs/FigA.txt

But it is worse than it seems. NASA had already done huge amounts of data tampering by 2001, erasing the 1940 spike.

From: Tom Wigley <wigley@ucar.edu>
To: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk> Subject: 1940s
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:25:38 -0600
Cc: Ben Santer <santer1@llnl.gov>

It would be good to remove at least part of the 1940s blip, but we are still left with “why the blip”.

di2.nu/foia/1254108338.txt

Extra bonus : NCAR then takes NASA’s fraudulent surface data, and tacks it on Michael Mann’s fraudulent hockey stick.

20150829_105703[1]ScreenHunter_10233 Aug. 29 17.14

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to A Spectacular Hockey Stick Of Fraud With NASA Surface Temperatures Since 2001

  1. Chewer says:

    Yes, CNN and NBC are reporting on this fraud with great zeal 😉
    I’m certain ABC and CBS will be following shortly with their own assessments…

  2. omanuel says:

    Next question: How wide is the matrix of deceit that engulfs us?

  3. Sparks says:

    It’s not fraud if you’re just carrying out orders!

    • Please look up the word fraud. The presence or absence of orders has nothing to do with it.

      Your statement seems closely related to Nixon’s “if the President does it, then it is not illegal.” (Even he acknowledged that he was completely alone among the American people in believing this.)

      If orders were involved, then all that means is that we have a conspiracy in which a plurality of conspirators are each guilty of fraud.

  4. Andy DC says:

    It is very depressing, knowing that blatant lies and a communist agenda are being fed to the people under the guise of “science”.

  5. gregole says:

    Oh for gosh sakes. This has gotten completely out of bounds. This is nonsense. It must stop.

  6. Snowleopard says:

    “Steve” must be woefully under medicated to remember so well. Probably avoided his fluoride and lithium hypoclorite laced water dosages and maybe even his (required?) mercury laced vaccines. I bet he even avoids the aluminum laced baking products. There needs to be be a law for this. The past is what we say it was! (/sarc)

  7. Hifast says:

    Reblogged this on Climate Collections and commented:
    Heller demonstrates again how historical NASA/NOAA data have changed with successive iterations of their products.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s