Today’s Featured Climate Fraudster – Heidi Cullen

Spectacular fraud from Heidi Cullen and Climate Central. They show an increase in heavy precipitation events in the US since 1950, and blame it on global warming.

ScreenHunter_2893 Sep. 03 23.02

Their graph is both correct, and completely fraudulent.

ScreenHunter_2892 Sep. 03 23.02

What they did was cherry pick an interval where heavy precipitation events were increasing. Had they used the entire US record, their readers would have seen that heavy precipitation events were just as common in the early 20th century, and that the trends are cyclical, and have nothing to do with CO2.

ScreenHunter_2891 Sep. 03 23.00

This is how climate criminals operate.


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Today’s Featured Climate Fraudster – Heidi Cullen

  1. Psalmon says:

    We call her Hidey from now on.

  2. omanuel says:

    Thanks to your keen insight and brave commitment to truth, Steven, it is now clear that physics became Stalin’s most frightening tool after WWII and remains so today. See:



    • omanuel says:

      Our greatest challenge is to correct the flaws in science without destroying the entire social and economic structure.

      But the flaws must be corrected, anyway, unless some member of the 99.97% consensus community is willing to public respond to the above ResearchGate paper.

      • omanuel says:

        ResearchGate allows AGW critics and supporters to READ, DOWNLOAD, and publicly COMMENT – affirming or denying experimental evidence the Sun’s pulsar core made and sustains every atom, life and planet in the solar system.

        The supposedly 97-% consensus community is surprisingly quiet when given an opportunity to publicly respond to evidence of the above empirical facts.

        Of 800 views to date, NOT ONE has had the courage to deny this empirical fact.

  3. QV says:

    What annoys me is that she must know that data prior to the 1950’s invalidates the theory that the increase is due to “global warming” but she ignores it.
    Doesn’t she realise that this is fraudulent and revise her beliefs accordingly?
    Such people are the real “climate deniers”.

    • lectrikdog says:

      It’s called: ‘Job Security.’

    • darrylb says:

      QV—-of course, but that is the point.
      Six years ago I thought there was cause for concern until my daughter who has degrees
      in biology and the environment challenged me.
      So I went about trying to prove her wrong.
      Sometimes children can be smarter than their parents

  4. bit chilly says:

    very similar to the variability in temperature trends,again nothing to do with co2.

  5. Robertv says:

    So climate change is dry and wet.

  6. Moors710 says:

    With the location of the USA in North America, an increase in rainfall could easily come from cooling. The heavy precipitation bands come from where water drops when condensation occurs due to cooling as the air moves north (northern hemisphere) or south (southern hemisphere). The boreal forest is in the rain band for the greatest part of the year in both the northern hemisphere (Canada, Alaska, Siberia and Northern Europe and the Northern continental USA from influence by Hudson Bay ) and in the Southern hemisphere (Chile and New Zealand). As the world cools the rain bands move further into the continental USA. The increase of rain in the Continental USA is a sign of cooling, not warming.

  7. Andy DC says:

    They hate drought, but also hate rain. Make up your f***ing mind!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s