All Warming Since 1997 Is Due To Government Fraud

Satellites show that global temperatures have been falling for almost two decades, but this doesn’t suit NASA’s agenda – so they generate fake temperature data to create the appearance of warming.

ScreenHunter_10437 Sep. 16 04.13

 Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

The divergence is spectacular, but particularly interesting is level of fraud going on during the current El Nino.

ScreenHunter_10438 Sep. 16 04.21

Global warming theory tells us that satellite temperatures should rise much more than surface temperatures during an El Nino – as occurred in 1998 and 2010. But this year, we don’t see that occurring. This is a smoking gun that Gavin and Tom have massively ramped up their fraud ahead of Paris.

PaintImage9

NASA is constantly tampering with data to make the past cooler and the present warmer. Over the past six months, Gavin has implemented yet another spectacular alteration of the data – to make the hiatus disappear.

GISSFigA2Changes-Sept2005-March2015-Sept2015_2

Global warming is biggest fraud in science history, and your tax dollars are financing it – to assist Obama’s efforts to “make electricity prices skyrocket

Progressives are completely insane, and are hell bent on wrecking our civilization. Will you continue to assist them?

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

30 Responses to All Warming Since 1997 Is Due To Government Fraud

  1. Obama was hoping for change. He’s hoping for change in climate.

  2. David A says:

    Great Post!
    The satellite methodology is consistent and verified by weather balloons. The surface record is a FUBAR mess. The CAGW theory DEMANDS that the troposphere warms 1.5 times the rate of the surface. By ALL the physics of the IPCC, whatever is causing the supposed surface warming, CO2 has NOTHING TO DO WITH IT.

  3. A while back there was a history of NASA by NASA explaining how NASA put lots of money into environmentalism. The reason is pretty obvious to me: environmentalism generates a whole host of demands for more “monitoring” of the earth … and so every time there is another scare, NASA get a huge trance of public money to monitor the scare that they largely created.

    Of course, I doubt anyone at NASA actually has the brains to see it that way. They are just cogs in the wheel. Some will be encouraging the growth of end user academics, some will be encouraging the end users to publish research into issues needing more funding. Some will be publicising all the “research” showing that more NASA funding is needed. Individually they may just be a cog in the machinery – but the whole machinery is certainly fraudulent. It either directly or indirectly encourages others to manufactures false data in order to gain money.

  4. Gail Combs says:

    The Alarmist keep telling us that the USA is not the world. However it sure looks like the USA is the main contributor to the ‘adjusted data’ Not all the tiny dots (meaning dropped stations)


    In Africa Canada and Australia.

    Steve has already covered the lack of stations in the interior of Africa. E.M. Smith covers The Bolivia Effect in South America.

    Verity Jones covers the deceit at length. Here is her graph for the drop out of Canadian stations. Dark Black Diamonds are the stations now used. Notice only two stations above 60N, only ~seven above 56N and one of the many above 64N.

    Canada – Top of the Hockey League (Part 1)

    …From over 600 individual temperature series and more than 540 combined series with records of more than 20 years, the thermometer record in Canada peaked in approx. 1975 (see map, left), but has since been decimated by station dropout.

    By 2009 there are less than 30 locations reporting temperature that are used by the Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN) prepared by the U.S. National Climate Data Center (NCDC); this data is also used as the input to NASA’s GIStemp program.
    You can see the locations of the stations on the map (left) and the most obvious ‘hole’ is the lack of stations above latitude 60N. Yukon, Nunavut and Northwest Territories make up 39% of Canada, but between them have only four stations: Dawson and Whitehorse (Y), Eureka and Coral Harbour (NT)….
    E.M.Smith’s marathon effort of examining records by country produced a “hair graph” for Canada using his dT method….

    Note how, when the number of thermometers in the station record falls of a cliff in 1990, there is a massive increase in the rate of change dT. It just suddenly takes off.

    Do not forget the Russians complained about CRU dropping their long running rural stations in favor of short term cities showing UHI.

    16/12/2009
    … On Tuesday, the Moscow-based Institute of Economic Analysis (IEA) issued a report claiming that the Hadley Center for Climate Change based at the headquarters of the British Meteorological Office in Exeter (Devon, England) had probably tampered with Russian-climate data.

    The IEA believes that Russian meteorological-station data did not substantiate the anthropogenic global-warming theory.

    Analysts say Russian meteorological stations cover most of the country’s territory, and that the Hadley Center had used data submitted by only 25% of such stations in its reports.

    Over 40% of Russian territory was not included in global-temperature calculations for some other reasons, rather than the lack of meteorological stations and observations.

    The data of stations located in areas not listed in the Hadley Climate Research Unit Temperature UK (HadCRUT) survey often does not show any substantial warming in the late 20th century and the early 21st century.

    The HadCRUT database includes specific stations providing incomplete data and highlighting the global-warming process, rather than stations facilitating uninterrupted observations.

    On the whole, climatologists use the incomplete findings of meteorological stations far more often than those providing complete observations.

    IEA analysts say climatologists use the data of stations located in large populated centers that are influenced by the urban-warming effect more frequently than the correct data of remote stations.

    The scale of global warming was exaggerated due to temperature distortions for Russia accounting for 12.5% of the world’s land mass. The IEA said it was necessary to recalculate all global-temperature data in order to assess the scale of such exaggeration.

    Global-temperature data will have to be modified if similar climate-date procedures have been used from other national data because the calculations used by COP15 analysts, including financial calculations, are based on HadCRUT research.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20091218203023/http://en.rian.ru/papers/20091216/157260660.html

  5. Robertv says:

    And the Climate fraud is just one of the minor frauds and crimes committed by these criminals.

  6. cfgjd says:

    How did government fraud make arctic sea ice, ice sheets, mountain glaciers and permafrost melt so much since 1997?

    • Disillusioned says:

      The same way government fraud caused an inverse relationship and Antarctic ice sheet growth, mountain glaciers and expansion of permafrost so much in the Southern Hemisphere since 1997. http://www.climate4you.com/images/NSIDC%20NHandSHandTOTALiceExtension12monthRunningAverage.gif

      On balance, no, the ice on this planet didn’t melt “so much” since 1997.

      • Disillusioned says:

        The fraud is about shaving and adding temps that didn’t exist, starting datasets near the bottom of temperature troughs or at the height of ice accumulation, purposefully, to create false trends.

    • Gail Combs says:

      AHHHhhh, yes cherry pick a VERY short time span that is far less than a full 88 year cycle and point to the ‘warming’ up swing of the cycle.

      When you look at CLIMATE, not weather you see a different story.

      The climate flipped around 1850 around eleven years after the sunspot cycle want from moribund to very active as predicted by Dr. Evans Notch-Delay Solar theory.

      ABSTRACT
      An ice core removed from the Upper Fremont Glacier in Wyoming provides evidence for abrupt climate change during the mid-1800s….

      At a depth of 152 m the refined age-depth profile shows good agreement (1736±10 A.D.) with the 14C age date (1729±95 A.D.). The δ18O profile of the Upper Fremont Glacier (UFG) ice core indicates a change in climate known as the Little Ice Age (LIA)….

      At this depth, the age-depth profile predicts an age of 1845 A.D. Results indicate the termination of the LIA was abrupt with a major climatic shift to warmer temperatures around 1845 A.D. and continuing to present day. Prediction limits (error bars) calculated for the profile ages are ±10 years (90% confidence level). Thus a conservative estimate for the time taken to complete the LIA climatic shift to present-day climate is about 10 years, suggesting the LIA termination in alpine regions of central North America may have occurred on a relatively short (decadal) timescale.
      http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/1999JD901095/full

      No SUVs around in 1850 were there?
      Norway is experiencing the Greatest Glacial Activity in the past 1,000 years.
      There is a nice study in Quaternary Research that did a study on glacial activity in Norway for the past ~8,000 years. That is during the Holocene.

      ABSTRACT:
      We explore the possibility of building a continuous glacier reconstruction by analyzing the integrated sedimentary response of a large (440 km2) glacierized catchment in western Norway, as recorded in the downstream lake Nerfloen (N61°56′, E6°52′). A multi-proxy numerical analysis demonstrates that it is possible to distinguish a glacier component in the ~8000-yr-long record, based on distinct changes in grain size, geochemistry, and magnetic composition. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) reveals a strong common signal in the 15 investigated sedimentary parameters, with the first principal component explaining 77% of the total variability. This signal is interpreted to reflect glacier activity in the upstream catchment, an interpretation that is independently tested through a mineral magnetic provenance analysis of catchment samples. Minimum glacier input is indicated between 6700-5700 cal yr BP, probably reflecting a situation when most glaciers in the catchment had melted away, whereas the highest glacier activity is observed around 600 and 200 cal yr BP. During the local Neoglacial interval (~4200 cal yr BP until present), five individual periods of significantly reduced glacier extent are identified at ~3400, 3000-2700, 2100-2000, 1700-1500, and ~900 cal yr BP.

      The authors state that most glaciers likely didn’t exist 6,000 years ago, and the highest period of the glacial activity has been in the past 600 years.….

      Top-Down Solar Modulation of Climate: evidence for centennial-scale change

      The work presented here is consistent with the interpretation of a recently reported effect [25] of solar variability on the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and European winter temperatures over the interval 1659–2010 in terms of top-down modulation of the blocking phenomenon…

      New Insights into North European and North Atlantic Surface Pressure Variability, Storminess, and Related Climatic Change since 1830

      The results show periods of relatively high dp(abs)24 and enhanced storminess around 1900 and the early to mid-1990s, and a relatively quiescent period from about 1930 to the early 1960s… there is no sign of a sustained enhanced storminess signal associated with global warming…..

      Spatial and temporal oxygen isotope variability in northern Greenland – implications for a new climate record over the past millennium
      Figure 10

      The middle graph covers 1000 AD through 1960 AD with a 40 year average.

      At no time during the last thousand years has it dipped as low as it has been since 1979. It never even came close.

      The ClimAstrologists have to deny history. Here is the history lesson.

      A seminal event for the season of popularity of global cooling was Stephen Schneider’s 1971 paper published in Science warning of a coming anthropogenic ice age entitled “Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols: Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate.”

      ….although the addition of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere does increase the surface temperature, the rate of temperature increase diminishes with increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. For aerosols, however, the net effect of increase in density is to reduce the surface temperature of Earth. Because of the exponential dependence of the backscattering, the rate of temperature decrease is augmented with increasing aerosol content. An increase by only a factor of 4 in global aerosol background concentration may be sufficient to reduce the surface temperature by as much as 3.5 ° K. If sustained over a period of several years, such a temperature decrease over the whole globe is believed to be sufficient to trigger an ice age.

    • darrylb says:

      Come on cfgjd.
      Do your due diligence in studying each issue.
      Yes, Glaciers have been melting since the industrial
      revolution, but there was no increase in rate since the heart of the little ice age
      long before.
      Arctic sea ice has been cyclic, Enormous amounts of articles and events
      verify all this.
      But since you like to challenge (which is good) I will throw a challenge to you.

      Can you explain why the following events, according to science occurred?
      12,000 years ago the Laurentide ice sheet (glacier) covered almost all of Canada
      and much of northern United States. .Later it melted, and the great lake Agassiz was formed; a lake larger than the sum of the area of the five Great Lakes.
      Much of it drained through the Great River Warren which was miles wide, Now the
      comparatively tiny Minnesota River flows in its basin. That change caused a tremendous oceanic rise.

      So, what were the reasons for that huge climate change? I am sure even you will have to admit that the purported 0.65 degree C. change is small compared to the change associated with that great melt.

      Of course going back millions of years, there must have been a tropical environment on the north shore of Alaska, or there would not be oil reserves there. The great Gorical, code name Al tried to associate the temperature changes as being caused by changes in CO2 concentration, but in fact the temperature change led the change in atmospheric CO2 concentration.
      Incidentally I calculated for myself, what the change in CO2 concentration would be with a 0.65 C change and it was only an increase of about 5%. If anybody was interested, I would show it here. It is about a two pages process because there are several compounds and chemical laws. present. ,

      • DD More says:

        He also might need to stop the kool-aide drinking. From info about Obama’s trip to Alaska.

        According to Deborah Kurtz, the physical science program manager for Kenai Fjords National Park where Obama hiked Tuesday, the Exit Glacier, which flows from the Harding Icefield has retreated 800 feet since 2008, 187 in 2014 alone. “Climate is the primary driver of ice loss,” she said, adding that Harding Icefield is 10% smaller than it was in 1950. She called what has been seen in recent years an “unprecedented rate of warming.”

        http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-84333175/

        But –
        Unlike many glacial terrains where cooling trends reduce summer melting, bringing on glacial advances, the Kenai Fjords glaciers move forward when warmer weather brings moisture-laden storms to the coast. Air is rapidly forced over the abrupt mountains and drops copious snowfall onto the Harding Icefield.

        http://www.nps.gov/akso/nature/science/ak_park_science/PDF/2004Vol3-1/Ecological-Overview-of-Kenai-Fjords-National-Park.pdf

        So if there is less ice, is Resident Obama now confirming it is getting cooler?

        On the “unprecedented rate”, since when?
        Changes in magnetic susceptibility (MS), organic-matter content (OM), and biogenic silica (BSi), record environmental changes since ~9500 BP. Goat Lake is situated ~450 m north of a drainage divide at ~70 m above lake level that separates the lake basin from the Harding Icefield (HIF) outlet glacier. Sediment analyses focused on the last 1000 yr; this interval includes a sharp transition from gyttja to overlying inorganic mud at ~1660 AD, which marks the first time since the Pleistocene deglaciation that the North Goat Outlet Glacier (NGO) of the HIF overtopped the drainage divide to spill meltwater into Goat Lake. One 14C age of ~1470 AD from a subfossil log buried by till in the NGO valley requires ~145 yr for the outlet glacier to have thickened 150 m to the elevation of the drainage divide where it remained until ~1890 AD. Since ~1890, the NGO has thinned 150 m and retreated 1.4 km, back to where it was in 1470 AD.
        https://nau.edu/uploadedFiles/Academic/CEFNS/NatSci/SESES/Forms/Daigle_2006.pdf

        Current glacier positions last seen in 1470. Yep unprecedented.

        See also – Calkin Wiles 1992

      • AndyG55 says:

        A recent study on some glaciers around Mt baker came up with the following graph (similar pattern for all glaciers in the region)

        We can see exactly why the climate fraudsters want to start their trends in around 1979.😉

      • Gail Combs says:

        darrylb,

        It depends on your time frame. Overall the temperatures of the Holocene are cooling with some ups and downs along the way.

        It ‘warmed up’ to modern temperatures in the decade around 1850 but it is still cooler than most of the Holocene.
        GREENLAND ICECORE

        SARGASSO ( middle of the North Atlantic Ocean)

        Arctic culture that thrived 1000 years before the Vikings;
        From the Eskimo Times Monday, Mar. 17, 1941

        “The corner of Alaska nearest Siberia was probably man’s first threshold to the Western Hemisphere. So for years archeologists have dug there for a clue to America’s prehistoric past. Until last year, all the finds were obviously Eskimo. Then Anthropologists Froelich G. Rainey of the University of Alaska and two collaborators struck the remains of a town, of inciedible size and mysterious culture. Last week in Natural History Professor Rainey, still somewhat amazed, described this lost Arctic city.
        It lies at Ipiutak on Point Hope, a bleak sandspit in the Arctic Ocean, where no trees and little grass survive endless gales at 30° below zero. But where houses lay more than 2,000 years ago, underlying refuse makes grass and moss grow greener. The scientists could easily discern traces of long avenues and hundreds of dwelling sites. A mile long, a quarter-mile wide, this ruined city was perhaps as big as any in Alaska today (biggest: Juneau, pop. 5,700).

        On the Arctic coast today an Eskimo village of even 250 folk can catch scarcely enough seals, whales, caribou to live on. What these ancient Alaskans ate is all the more puzzling because they seem to have lacked such Arctic weapons as the Eskimo harpoon.
        Yet they had enough leisure to make many purely artistic objects, some of no recognizable use. Their carvings are vaguely akin to Eskimo work but so sophisticated and elaborate as to indicate a relation with some centre of advanced culture — perhaps Japan or southern Siberia —certainly older than the Aztec or Mayan….

        The Academy of science report of the same year regarding the Ipiutak culture described above
        http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1078291

        Another paper:
        Temperature and precipitation history of the Arctic

        Solar energy reached a summer maximum (9% higher than at present) ~11 ka ago and has been decreasing since then, primarily in response to the precession of the equinoxes. The extra energy elevated early Holocene summer temperatures throughout the Arctic 1-3°C above 20th century averages, enough to completely melt many small glaciers throughout the Arctic, although the Greenland Ice Sheet was only slightly smaller than at present.”

  7. Andy DC says:

    We no longer accept satellite data and there also has been a big reduction of actual weather stations in remote areas. Kind of makes it easy for alarmists to create their own “reality” with their red and brown crayons in hand. Thus nothing they say is the least bit credible.

    Also, billions spent climate “research” but we can’t spend a few dollars to maintain good temperature records? We do spend millions to send up satellites, but then ignore them as well, when their readings depart from their agenda? What does all this tell you?

    • Gail Combs says:

      FIRE THE SOBs!

      • darrylb says:

        Gail, since you might be the only one interested here, read my note from above.

        Also, I will have to state my own little bit of irony here. Today is my birthday, also today marks the anniversary of the Mayflower beginning its voyage under the command of Miles Standish. Also, I am a decendent of Miles Standish (as are probably millions of other people–several of them, including three presidents important. some of us not)

        • The Mayflower? You mean the 107th ship that came to North America (Virginia had 2000 settlers by then, Santa Fe New Mexico was settled, and Albany NY was already 6 years old by then and full of Dutch fur traders.).

        • Gail Combs says:

          My birthday is in a couple weeks. My Mom’s sister traced us back to Alexander Hamilton at which point my Mom and her brother had lots of fun pointing out he was illegitimate.

        • darrylb says:

          Comeon Morgan, don’t steal my thunder!!!
          I have to have something to feel important 🙂

  8. rah says:

    I know why leftist media twits are nuts but I really never have understood why Artsy types so often are already off the deep end. http://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2015/09/16/james-cameron-climate-denialists-right-wont-face-globes-biggest

  9. hskiprob says:

    Steven, please rebut this one form Science Daily. “Arctic sea ice summertime minimum is fourth lowest on record”, if you haven’t already done so. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/09/150915211529.htm

  10. AndyG55 says:

    And apart from the 1997-2001 events, there has been NO WARMING IN THE WHOLE SATELLITE DATA

    That absolutely no CO2 warming signature in 36 or so years.

    This ANTI-CO2 hysteria has to stop.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s