Visualizing NASA’s Spectacular Sea Level Fraud

In 1983, NASA’s James Hansen showed 9 cm (3.5 inches) of sea level rise from 1880 to 1980, or 0.9 mm/year.

ScreenHunter_3121 Sep. 21 08.53

NASA now shows twice that much sea level rise from 1880 to 1980 – 1.8 mm/year

ScreenHunter_3122 Sep. 21 08.54

Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Sea Level

The graph below overlays the two at the same scale, normalized to 1880. Impressive data tampering from NASA’s band of climate criminals.

ScreenHunter_3131 Sep. 21 11.28


But it is much worse than it seems. NASA now ignores tide gauge data because it shows sea level rise slowing since the 1950’s, and instead uses massively tampered satellite data to claim a sea level rise rate of 3.22 mm/year.

ScreenHunter_3124 Sep. 21 09.07

But even at their wildly fraudulent 3.22 mm/year, it will still take thousands of years to drown Manhattan, which Hansen predicted would happen between 2008 and 2018.


Stormy weather –

The level of fraud and incompetence at NASA is so massive, that they want to jail anyone who criticizes them.


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Visualizing NASA’s Spectacular Sea Level Fraud

  1. Elaine Supkis says:

    Have you noticed how ALL the ‘weather news’ is about 90% California? Even Arizona has had monsoon rains now and even dangerous floods. The entire focus is on California…it is burning up! It is dry! Hot! Movie stars are fainting in the super heat of LA!!! We are all doomed.

  2. Jason Calley says:

    Just a small typo: “James Hansen showed 9 cm (3.5 inches) of sea level rise from 1880 to 1980, or 9mm/year.” I think that should be 0.9mm. Same thing a bit further down: “NASA now shows twice that much sea level rise from 1880 to 1980 – 18mm/year”. That should be 1.8mm.

    Tony, I am constantly amazed by your ability to show so plainly that the official statistics are wrong. I am also constantly amazed that so many people cannot see the facts when you present them so plainly.

  3. Latitude says:

    I’m amazed that I live directly on the ocean…and our water level has not changed since this house was built over 75 years ago

    • Gail Combs says:

      From an older comment by tomwys1

      First you need to remember that the Satellite radars that Topex/Poseidon/Jason rely upon cannot resolve at the millimeter level. The Ku Band can only resolve 23 mm and the C band limits to 56mm. With orbital tracking error in the 20 – 40 mm range, there is such an error range that reliance on the satellite reportage for public policy purposes is tantamount to malpractice, if not outright criminality.

      In tectonically inert places (neither land rising nor subsiding) such as the Gulf of Maine, there is a slight upward trend in sea-level, but minuscule at that. The level recorded by the Portland Maine Tide Gauge in 2014 is IDENTICAL (to the millimeter!) to that measured in 1947.

      Every single data set has been F…K-up by the Climastrologists. From the temperature records to the CO2 records to sea level records and now the solar records. It will take YEARS to undo the frecken mess these criminals made.

      • Latitude says:

        Gail, we live on a rock…I’m pretty sure it’s not subsiding….dock is cut into solid rock…it’s at exactly the same water level
        thanks for that link from Tom…you’re the best!

  4. Climatism says:

    Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
    Truly Orwellian.

  5. Steve Case says:

    Here’s what Colorado University’s Sea Level Research Group has done to the data

    When first published in 2004 the rate was 2.6 mm/yr
    Today that same time line out to 2004 is 3.5 mm/yr.

  6. Steve Case says:

    Thanks Tony that is a great find.

  7. Steve Case says:

    And by the way, the CU Sea Level Research Group’s latest release 3 is up to 3.3 mm/yr so expect NASA to bump that “Satellite Data 1993 – Present” chart to CU’s latest.

    I’m expecting CU to come out with Release 4 in time for Paris in December. It will be interesting to see if they can squeeze 3.4 out of their satellites.

  8. Psalmon says:

    O want to inspire young people to “science”:

    “Cool clock, Ahmed. Want to bring it to the White House? We should inspire more kids like you to like science. It’s what makes America great.”

    Too bad this “science” is also a fraud:

    • Elaine Supkis says:

      AND he was making a prototype suitcase bomb minus the TNT. It is quite obvious. I googled ‘suitcase bombs’ and all the actual ones mainly from the FBI and EU cops looked exactly like his ‘experiment’.

      • Gail Combs says:

        He was probably checking to see if he could actually get it into the school. Now idiot Progressives are donating lots of money to the kid.

        All the parents at that school should tell the town, he goes or we go and back it up. Start another school and refuse to pay the school tax.

        Until parents get some backbone their kids are going to be at risk.

  9. Gail Combs says:

    And long term the Sea levels are still FALLING as glaciers re-establish in the Arctic and Norway.

    This is a critical study because it is the one that yanks the WIKI sea level chart (adjusted of course) from a falling sea level to a slowly rising sea level. (The area is tectonically stable and unglaciated so there is no need for any adjustments.)

    This figure shows sea level rise since the end of the last glacial episode based on data from Fleming et al. 1998, Fleming 2000, & Milne et al. 2005. These papers collected data from various reports and adjusted them for subsequent vertical geologic motions, primarily those associated with post-glacial continental and hydroisostatic rebound. — WIKI

    Santa Catarina is the dark red cross above the pack on the right. Remove it and sea level is actually falling for the last 2,000 years.

    The Quaternary Geological History of the Santa Catarina Southeastern Region (Brazil) 1999

    The first part discusses drilling in several locations and analyzing samples. They mention dating prior to that was guesses. “…. A drilling campaign done in the domain permitted the sampling of material for 14C datings, and the obtained data confirmed some previously assumed ages. The sequence of events, that originated the Holocene deposits, has been also reconstructed through drilling and 14C dating of the collected peat and shell samples…”

    In the body of the text is this:

    Partially abutted against the Pleistocene barrier island/lagoonal system III, there is the Holocene depositional system. This unit is attributable to the Santos Transgression of Suguio & Martin (1978), along the State of São Paulo coastline, or to the Last Transgression of Bittencourt et al. (1979) along the State of Bahia coastline, being similar to the barrier island/lagoonal system IV of Villwock et al. (1986), along the State of Rio Grande do Sul coastline.

    This system is related to the post-glacial transgressive episode whose culmination stage was attained about 5.1 ky BP, when a barrier island alignment was formed parallel to the shoreline, while drainage net was drowned. The subsequent regressive episode promoted the barrier island progradation following the lagoonal basin silting.

    The paleoshorelines limited by ancient cliffs carved within Pleistocene terraces, presently representing the inner limit of the Holocene terrace, shows that this sea-level reached about 4m above the present one. Several terraces situated in different altitudes, and truncation of past morphological features nowadays observed on Holocene deposits, as well as along present lagoonal margins suggest that small scale sea-level oscillations occurred during the last 5 ky….

    Maximum of the Holocene transgression – This episode was exhaustively studied along most of Brazilian coast (Suguio et al. 1985). The relative sea-level rise during this transgression drowned the downstream courses and lagoonal margins, eroding ancient marine terraces and giving rise to sand spits and barrier islands, which formed new lagoonal systems along the coast. Mollusk shells and wood fragments contained within lagoonal deposits indicated radiocarbon ages between 5 and 7 ky BP (Mendes 1993; Pitoni 1993), suggesting that the barrier islands installation occurred before the Holocene culmination stages (5.1 ky BP)….

    Construction of Holocene wave-built terrace – The sea-level drop following the 5.1 ky BP culmination stage originated the wave-built terrace abutted against the original barrier island, with the consequent shoreline progradation in general as regressive beach ridges. Several truncations of these beach-ridge systems, as well as many levels of marginal lagoonal terraces suggest that the dominantly regressive trend was momentarily interrupted by minor transgressive episodes. The radiocarbon ages of the natural shell beds indicate that between 5 and 3 ky BP the relative sea-level was higher than today, with consequent expansion of the lagoonal areas frequently transformed into bays, and warmer paleotemperatures were favourable for great proliferation of mollusks in the area (Mendes 1993; Pitoni 1993).

    “…a relative sea-level change curve for the last 7 ky in the area Florianópolis-Jaguaruna (Fig. 7) is outlined…”

    This study shows a sea level highstand ~ 4 meters above the present level about ~5000 years ago. With sea level oscillating since then. Not only has the sea levels dropped since the Holocene Optimum the evidence shows that “warmer paleotemperatures were favourable for great proliferation of mollusks in the area” (Santa Catarina Brazil is at latitude 27.2500°S. )

    Two more studies showing falling sea level.

    Mid to late Holocene sea-level reconstruction of Southeast Vietnam using beachrock and beach-ridge deposits

    ….backshore deposits along the tectonically stable south-eastern Vietnamese coast document Holocene sea level changes…..reconstructed for the last 8000 years….The rates of sea-level rise decreased sharply after the rapid early Holocene rise and stabilized at a rate of 4.5 mm/year between 8.0 and 6.9 ka. Southeast Vietnam beachrocks reveal that the mid-Holocene sea-level highstand slightly above + 1.4 m was reached between 6.7 and 5.0 ka, with a peak value close to + 1.5 m around 6.0 ka….

    Translation the sea level was up to 1.5 meters higher than today in a tectonically stable area ~5000 years ago to 2000 years ago.

    Late Quaternary highstand deposits of the southern Arabian Gulf: a record of sea-level and climate change

    …..It has therefore been necessary to infer the ages of these sediments by a comparison of their stratigraphy and elevation with deposits known from other parts of the world. We regard this approach as valid because the southern Gulf coastline lacks evidence for significant widespread neotectonic uplift,…….
    …..Widespread evidence exists for a Holocene sea level higher than at present in the southern Arabian Gulf, indicating that it peaked at 1–2 m above present level, c. 5.5 ka bp…….

    This study shows a sea level highstand ~1 to 2 meters above the present level about ~5500 years ago.

  10. Andy DC says:

    If everyone in this country knew what we knew, there would be blood in the streets. But most people are too preoccupied about their fantasy football teams and the latest idiot sitcom to know anything or give a damn.

    • Gail Combs says:

      I am afraid you are correct. Until they are really hurting people don’t pay attention to what the corrupt politicians are up to. With the MSM as a cover the politicians literally get away with murder.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s