Separation Of Church And Brain

ScreenHunter_10514 Sep. 24 01.15

Global_Carbon_Budget_2014_v1.0_final21Sept2014.xlsx

The First Amendment was intended to protect us from spectacles like we are seeing in Washington DC, with government and church attempting to push their brainless global warming religion on the American people.

US CO2 emissions have been declining since Bush was president, but China’s CO2 emissions have been skyrocketing and are now double the US. Even if you believe their climate scam, attacking the US is pointless. It won’t have any impact on global emissions.

The purpose of the Obama/Francis climate scam is to hurt the US, not alter the climate.

ObamaHalo1 (1)

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Separation Of Church And Brain

  1. Eric Simpson says:

    It’s insane what the effete leftists are doing to neuter our country by destroying our energy producing capabilities while allowing are potential #1 future enemy China to expand relentlessly.

    I really like Trump because Trump will stick it to China instead of China sticking it to us. And Trump is the man as far climate change. Watch Trump’s excellent response to a climate change question, as Trump gets the audience involved to dismiss the question as ludicrous:

    Trump on climate change:
    “I call it weather. You know, the weather changes.” -Donald Trump
    “This very expensive global warming bullshit has got to stop.” -Donald Trump
    “Surprise? 1970’s global cooling alarmists were pushing the same no-growth liberal agenda as today’s global warming.” -Donald Trump
    “Gore wants us to clean up our factories and plants in order to protect us from global warming, when China and other countries couldn’t care less. It would make us totally non-competitive in the manufacturing world, and China, Japan and India are laughing at America’s stupidity.” -Donald Trump
    “With the coldest winter ever recorded, with snow setting record levels up and down the coast, the Nobel committee should take the Nobel Prize back from Al Gore.” -Donald Trump

  2. rah says:

    The SCOTUS interpretation of that separation is primarily based on a single letter from Thomas Jefferson http://www.constitution.org/tj/sep_church_state.htm. But in my view that interpretation is more strenuous than even Jefferson would have intended it to be. Jefferson wrote: “….Our rulers can have no authority over such natural rights, only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our God. The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say there are twenty gods or no god. In neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg………” (Notes on Virginia, 1785.)
    And yet now we see our governments forcing their view of institution of marriage by force of law upon those with different beliefs.

    Jefferson was from Virginia. Virginia as a colony unlike the others, established the Church of England as the official church. That state church was a bed of corruption and abused it’s position for profit and to try and stamp out all other Christian sects in the Colony.

    Jefferson saw this when growing up and it had a great impact on how he viewed organized religion and it’s relationship to the state. Even when he wrote the declaration of independence the last sentence which says: “And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.” was not wholly his composition. The phrase “with firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence” was added by vote of both the committee and the general assembly.

    Obviously Jefferson’s strict view on separation was not in agreement with the opinions of the vast majority of the founders on the matter. And yet it is Jefferson’s view which the SCOTUS references to justify it’s rulings on the matter.

    • Jason Calley says:

      Hey rah! Good points you make.

      (Just for clarity, “State” with a capital “S” signifies a specific governmental body, such as Virginia, Georgia, or New York. The use of “state” without a capital “S” is just the generic meaning of any system of government.)
      One thing that most people never point out is that in the Bill of Rights, the injunction against establishing a religion is only directed against the Federal government. “CONGRESS shall make no law…” At the time of adopting the Constitution, several of the sovereign States had established religions. Those religions were not mandatory on State citizens, but they were endorsed by and to at least some extent subsidized by the State. Those State religions continued for the next few decades but slowly fell into disfavor and many States incorporated amendments in their State constitutions disallowing the action. After the Civil War, the Southern States were required to rewrite their constitutions and a prohibition of State established religions was included. Additionally, some people interpret the 14th Amendment as extending the Congressional restriction to become applicable to the individual States. Any way, the point is that the founding fathers knew what they wrote. CONGRESS was initially restricted from establishing a religion, but the States were not. Again, it is important to point out that even in States that established religion, membership was not mandatory, and in fact, it was illegal; to use religion as a basis to exclude anyone from the holding of elected office. On the other hand, the Second Amendment is not limited to restrictions of weapons by Congress. The Second Amendment states that “the people” shall not have their right restricted. Thus any State that signed the Constitution cannot restrict that right.

      Life (and history) would be simpler if people would actually read what was written.

      • Gail Combs says:

        “CONGRESS was initially restricted from establishing a religion, but the States were not.”

        Careful The mussies will want to establish a caliphate!

        Mohamad Abdun Nasir, Jakarta | Opinion | Sat, May 10 2008, 10:34 AM Caliphate and sharia law

        This newspaper ran an article by Muhammad Ismail Yusanto, a spokesperson of Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI), about sharia and the caliphate (April 23)…. [Remember Obummer was raised AS A MUSLIM in Indonesia.]

        HTI offers two central discourses: the establishment of a caliphate and the application of sharia law. Both seem to be inseparable; without a caliphate, the sharia application will never be totally accomplished. Therefore, both are complementary to each other. These grand themes in fact constitute the global discourse applied by most Hizbut Tahrir movements in the world and have become the main idea that links their global ideological ground and commonality.

        To the HTI, the caliphate constitutes a basic Islamic political institution that will unite all Muslims in the world regardless of their ethnicity, language or culture into a single community called the ummah, which is headed by a caliph….

        Consequently, it denies modern secular political thoughts such as democracy and nationalism. Democracy is seen to be contrary to God’s sole sovereignty. Moreover, inconsistencies and double standards in the realization of democracy have strengthened Islamists’ criticism of it. Similarly, nationalism, as a logical consequence of the emergence of nation-states, is rejected because it is a Western invention contrary to the concept of ummah….. [I have a pen and a phone — Obummer.]

        The writer is a lecturer at Mataram State Institute for Islamic Studies and a Fulbright scholar who is pursuing his PhD in religion at Emory University, Atlanta.

        Now you know why the Communists/Fabian Socialists have made pact with the muslims. Both want a totalitarian government and the big wigs are willing to use any religion to get it.

        I’ve made up my mind. I’ll soon be packing my bags and leaving Birmingham to pledge allegiance to the Caliphate. Thousands more, mostly from Europe, will be doing the same.

        And if that doesn’t send chills up the spine…

      • rah says:

        The SOTUS has deemed that certain other rights or amendments are “incorporated” in the 14th amendment. It is through this concept of “incorporation” by which the Federal Government has been able to force states to adhere to the provisions in the Bill of Rights never intended to be applied to them. And it is that concept of “incorporation” which has basically nullified the the 10th amendment.

        http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Fourteenth+Amendment

        • rah says:

          And BTW, the 2nd amendment has not been “incorporated” into the 14th even though it says it is a right of “the people”!

        • Gail Combs says:

          Of course the 14th may never have been ratified… link

          Since the 1930s when FDR threatened to pack the court after SOTUS kept declaring his ‘New World Order Deal’ scheme unconstitutuional, the SOTUS has been working very hard to rewrite the Constitution so it aligns with the wishes of the Globalist Fabian Socialists and the United Nations.

          French socialist and former WTO Director-General Pascal Lamy wrote:

          …The reality is that, so far, we have largely failed to articulate a clear and compelling vision of why a new global order matters — and where the world should be headed. Half a century ago, those who designed the post-war system — the United Nations, the Bretton Woods system, the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) — were deeply influenced by the shared lessons of history.

          All had lived through the chaos of the 1930s — when turning inwards led to economic depression, nationalism and war. All, including the defeated powers, agreed that the road to peace lay with building a new international order — and an approach to international relations that questioned the Westphalian, sacrosanct principle of sovereigntySOURCE

          First Franklin D. Roosevelt was president from 1933 to 1945.

          Second the Bretton Woods system was established in 1944. It was written by Communist spy, Harry Dexter White and Fabian Socialist John Maynard Keynes.

          It set up the much hated IMF and and the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Bank. IBRD is the original World Bank institution. Currencies were pegged to gold. The investment bank, NM Rothschild ‘chaired’ the meeting setting those gold prices daily for the last 200 years source

          The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) ===> World Trade Agreement the EU’s big brother.

          “approach to international relations that questioned the Westphalian, sacrosanct principle of sovereignty” is in plain language, nations are sovereign and NOT vassal states of the United Nations.

          The UK for example IS a vassal state of the EU. “Thanks to the primacy of EU law over national law. Thanks to the work of the European Court of Justice in ensuring enforcement and respect for the rule of law. And thanks to a clear articulation between the Commission, the Parliament, and the European Court of Justice.” — Pascal Lamy (He should know as he was high up in the EU before moving to the WTO.)

          We have had traitors working against the sovereignty of the USA for more years than most people realize. It started as soon as the American Revolution ended and has not ceased.

  3. John says:

    The real reason for the Global Warming – Clinate Change scam has never been the climate. It’s simply a vehicle – a tool to help drive the implementation of a new global, fascist regime.

    Having the Papacy involved has pushed the whole thing up a gear – the Papacy has always had its eyes on global domination, and what better opportunity than this, where this Scarlet Woman (The Whore) can take a comfortable ride on the back of The Beast towards the throne of global rule.
    (Reference to Revelations 17).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s