Iowa Summers Used To Be Much Hotter And Longer

On this date in 1953, it was an unbelievable 101 degrees at Indianola, Iowa.  September days over 100 degrees used to be fairly common there, but they haven’t had one in over 60 years.

ScreenHunter_3283 Sep. 28 05.12

For the entire year, the frequency of 100 degree days has also plummeted.

ScreenHunter_3282 Sep. 28 05.10

Prior to 1960, one hundred degree days in Iowa were fairly common, but they almost never happen anymore.

ScreenHunter_3285 Sep. 28 05.25ScreenHunter_3286 Sep. 28 05.27

This drop in temperature after the 1950’s was well understood at the time, but criminals in the US government have since erased it.

ScreenHunter_3281 Sep. 27 16.41

13 Mar 1969 – New Ice Age threatens Europe

ScreenHunter_3280 Sep. 27 16.30

NASA now shows current temperatures much hotter than the 1950’s, which has no basis in reality.


An entire field of science is based around massively fraudulent data from NASA, NOAA and CRU.


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

24 Responses to Iowa Summers Used To Be Much Hotter And Longer

  1. sabretoothed says:

    NASA admits undersea volcanoes effect the temperature 2001

  2. rah says:

    Does the government share it’s raw/primary temperature data? Or does it deny the public access?

  3. ren says:

    Despite the El Niño index of the AMO does not grow. For comparison, in 1998 and 2010.
    Can also see that the AMO strongly decreased in winter in years of solar minimum in 1996 and 2009.

  4. cfgjd says:

    Where are the peer-reviewed publications? As you know, wind-ass claims on a blog donät make it science..

    Gotta repost this as it’s so hilarious:

    • Gail Combs says:

      You forgot to add AND 14.12% fake data and up to 72% practice other questionable research practices. They even go so far as to DISCRINMINATE!!!

      OH THE HORROR!!!

      Survey shocker: Liberal profs admit they’d discriminate against conservatives in hiring, advancement; ‘Impossible lack of diversity’ reflects ideological intimidation on campus

      US scientists significantly more likely to publish fake research, study finds

      How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data

      ….The final sample consisted of 21 surveys that were included in the systematic review, and 18 in the meta-analysis.

      A pooled weighted average of 1.97% (N = 7, 95%CI: 0.86–4.45) of scientists admitted to have fabricated, falsified or modified data or results at least once –a serious form of misconduct by any standard– and up to 33.7% admitted other questionable research practices. In surveys asking about the behaviour of colleagues, admission rates were 14.12% (N = 12, 95% CI: 9.91–19.72) for falsification, and up to 72% for other questionable research practices. Meta-regression showed that self reports surveys, surveys using the words “falsification” or “fabrication”, and mailed surveys yielded lower percentages of misconduct. When these factors were controlled for, misconduct was reported more frequently by medical/pharmacological researchers than others.

      Considering that these surveys ask sensitive questions and have other limitations, it appears likely that this is a conservative estimate of the true prevalence of scientific misconduct.

      Corruption Is Destroying Basic Science:

      Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine are the two most prestigious medical journals in the world.

      It is therefore striking that their chief editors have both publicly written that corruption is undermining science.

      The editor in chief of Lancet, Richard Horton, wrote last month:

      Much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, “poor methods get results”. The Academy of Medical Sciences, Medical Research Council, and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council have now put their reputational weight behind an investigation into these questionable research practices. The apparent endemicity [i.e. pervasiveness within the scientific culture] of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of “significance” pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale. We reject important confirmations. Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent, endpoints that foster reductive metrics, such as high-impact publication. National assessment procedures, such as the Research Excellence Framework, incentivise bad practices. And individual scientists, including their most senior leaders, do little to alter a research culture that occasionally veers close to misconduct.


      Part of the problem is that no-one is incentivised to be right.

      Similarly, the editor in chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Marcia Angell, wrote in 2009:

      It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.

      In other words Progressives have finally managed to completely trash the word ‘science’ and people, even the MSM are finally starting to notice.

    • That figure is complete bullshit. It refers to academics who teach because they “can’t do.”
      People who can do work for industry and are republicans.

      • Gail Combs says:

        And if you do find a Progressive in industry he is the one falsifying the data on the lab results. (I have fired enough of them for just that.)

        • wizzum says:

          Gail, He’s normally the loudmouth that seems to be permanently in the break room, letting everybody know just how progressive he is.

      • Frank K. says:

        Here’s a guy who had lots of peer reviewed publications. He’s an arctic expert too. Said the arctic would be ice free by now. Smart guy.

    • Jason Calley says:

      CAGW cult members are the people who think if you give every child a trophy, that will make them all winners. In the case of science, they think that if you give someone a lab coat and a piece of paper, then suddenly, everything they say is “science!”

      Measurements? Data? Reproducibility? Verification? Accurate prediction? Gosh! You mean all that stuff has something to do with science??!

    • Andy DC says:

      Some day you should get off your lazy ass and come to the NWS Library in Silver Spring, MD where all the data you can ever imagine are in State Monthly Climatic summaries. I have personally delved into the situation as Mr. Goddard has and many others on the blog. It is so much easier to allow yourself to be brainwashed by unadulterated political propaganda that it is to actually check into the facts yourself! When you check into the facts yourself, you will frankly be shocked by all the fraud and deception.

  5. rah says:

    Tell us cfgjd what exactly makes something “science”? What are the qualifiers?

    • Frank K. says:

      Actually, cfgjd illustrates yet again that the “climate change” fad has nothing to do with science and everything to do with politics.

      (The left-wing nuts are just sore that the arctic melting thing didn’t work out again this year…heh!)

    • Gail Combs says:

      The Progressives are doing to ‘Science ™’ what they have done to the words Liberal and Capitalism. Completely twisted it until word bares no resemblance to the classical meaning and instead resembles what is found floating in a cesspool.

      Progressives corrupt and soil and besmear everything they touch so they must constantly grab another’s skin to hide there putrid decaying selves while they are conning the innoncents into believing the snake oil they are trying to sell.

      “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution, …democracy is a poor political system for fighting global warming. Communist China, she says, is the best model.” —- Christiana Figueres, Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change

      “We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.” – Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation

      “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” – Ted Turner, founder of CNN and the UN Foundation

      “It is a campaign not for abundance but for austerity. It is a campaign not for more freedom but for less. Strangest of all, it is a campaign not just against other people, but against ourselves.” -George Monbiot,

      If people like cfgjd and the rest of the Progressives were not so intent in dragging me and other innocents into the hellhole they are digging for humanity I would be very happy to give them a good swift boot and fill in the hole. Unfortunately they need slaves to replace the energy generators they are closing down so they need the innocents they are tricking into slavery.

      • Frank K. says:

        To add to your comments, Gail, it’s always easy for people like cfgjd to advocate for the destruction of our western lifestyle as long as the lights come on, clean water comes from the tap, the heat warms the house in the winter, and food is available at the local grocery store. The problem with these people is that they aren’t “walkin’ the walk”. If they were, they would not be posting to websites, or even be on the internet or using computers/cell phones/ipads, nor would they use any products made of plastics, metals, or receive any products delivered by carbon polluting trucks. They would live off the land, away from mainstream society, in an agrarian society where they spend 100% of their time on producing their own food, electricity, water, clothes, and shelter. Alas, you won’t see hardly any of them even approach this kind of living. Yet, they want to condemn us all to some form of it. Incredible…

        • rah says:

          I think a lot of the more radical ones want to condemn us to death.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Oh you are correct RAH, Hubby had one of the Cambridge Communist Commies asking for his address so he would know where to go after the revolution to kill him.

          I had another one at a dance tell me to my face, after the revolution we will KILL YOU.

          They are real sweeties. I was never so glade to leave a place as I was when I packed up and left the Boston area and I have lived in over 40 places. (Including Indiana – nice place.)

      • Gail Combs says:

        Frank K.,

        And that is why I am pretty much fed-up with the spoiled rotten whiny hypocrites who comprise most of the rank and file of the Progressive’s Useful idiots.

        This is your typical Progressive Protester.

        For each of the 984 Occupy Wall Street protesters arrested in New York City between September 18 and October 15, police collected and filed an information sheet recording the arrestee’s name, age, sex, criminal charge, home address…

        Among addresses for which information is available, single-family homes listed on those police intake forms have a median value of $305,000 — a far higher number than the $185,400 median value of owner-occupied housing units in the United States.

        Even in the nation’s currently depressed housing market, at least 95 of the protesters’ residences are worth approximately $500,000 or more.

        The median monthly rent for those living in apartments whose information is readily available is $1,850.

        …. The median age of “Occupy” protesters taken into custody is 27 years.

        Notice how much the Progressives actually ‘care’ about the environment. On the right is the piles of garbage collected that Occupy Wall Street left for others to clean up. 30 tons of trash was left behind at “Occupy L.A.” On the left is the spotless field left after a Tea Party Demonstration. (No I am not a member of either)

        Human waste, petty crime at Occupy Wall Street sites test patience of cops, neighbors

        I have cleared acres of land with nothing but a bucksaw and loping shears and a pick axe. I am currently digging fence post holes by hand. I know what it is like to deal with trying to farm livestock with no tractor because some S.O. B. stole mine and then stole my lawn tractor too. I have hire these young folk and they can’t keep up with a little old lady walking across a pasture much less do any useful work like digging a post hole or hauling the bush and trees I cut.

        And these asses want a non-electric, no mining, Pol Pot type regime? They wouldn’t last a day.

  6. Marsh says:

    rah ; that Question maybe too difficult for cfgjd . With such a narrow outlook and parochial mentality ; cfgjd probably thinks, other Countries don’t have qualified Scientists…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s