More Detail On Barack Obama’s Alaskan Climate Fraud

Few people can pack as many lies into two paragraphs as Barack Obama.

If we do nothing, Alaskan temperatures are expected to rise between six and twelve degrees by the end of the century, changing all sorts of industries forever. This is all real. This is happening to our fellow Americans right now.”

“Alaska’s governor recently told me that four villages are in imminent danger and need to be relocated. Already rising sea levels are beginning to swallow an island community.

President Obama’s Climate Change Message: “This Is All Real, This Is Happening Now” | Video | RealClearPolitics

According to the University of Alaska, temperatures in Alaska have fallen 0.1 degrees since 1977. That extrapolates out to a rise of zero degrees by the end of the century, not “six to twelve degrees” as Obama claims.

Seasonal_Yearly_Temp_Change_77_F (2)

Temperature Changes in Alaska | Alaska Climate Research Center

According to NOAA, sea level is falling at 14 out of 17 Alaskan tide gauges. Obama’s claim that sea level rise is “beginning to swallow an island” is absurd.

North Pacific _RegionalTrends_Plot_3

Sea Level Trends – Mean Sea Level Trends for North Pacific Stations

But Obama’s most ridiculous claim is that we can “do something about it.”  Do something about what? Falling temperatures? Falling sea level? What does he propose to do about that?

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

21 Responses to More Detail On Barack Obama’s Alaskan Climate Fraud

  1. 49erfan7 says:

    What can ‘we’ do?
    Raise taxes, destroy industrial capacity and make people more reliant on government.

    There was one word missing from Obama’s statement
    “Folks”. These folks need your and my help.

  2. AndyG55 says:

    “What does he propose to do about that?”

    Obviously we need more atmospheric CO2,

    Since CO2 causes warming and the sea level rise….

    ….more CO2 is needed to reverse the current trends.

    Did I get that right via climate cultist logic (something I never have managed to understand) !

  3. Henry P says:

    For Anchorage I have -0.2K for same period 1977-2014
    I am not sure if that calculates to -0.6F?
    I also think we should exclude the Barrow result, as it is a complete out=lier, due to the warmer Gulf stream during [most of ] this period

  4. AndyG55 says:

    note also, that if you go to this page

    http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/northatlantictrends.htm

    we get the statement …

    “given that the absolute global sea level rise is believed to be 1.7-1.8 millimeters/year. ”

    oh dear.. I thought someone said it was 3.2mm/year (or something like that)

  5. omanuel says:

    Steven Goddard aka Tony Heller,

    Thank you for holding these deceivers’ “feet to the fire” of reality.

    The outcome to the Climategate scam is both inevitable and self-evident,

    1. Since over 2000 scientists read the paper, Stalin’s science,” on Research-Gate without posting a single objection, and

    2. Since the final conclusion to the Climategate scam is both self-evident and inevitable,

    The courage exhibited by you and others hasencouraged me to proceed to write and post that conclusion on Research-Gate as Post-Stalin Science.”

    https://rogerhelmermep.wordpress.com/2015/10/14/plenary-speech-climate-change-october-14th-2015/#comment-35669

  6. Alf says:

    So why is Barrow such an outlier??

  7. Andy DC says:

    I guess those that had the stomach to watch the debate heard Uncle Bernie say that climate change was the most important threat we face. Like a couple degrees of warming (which isn’t happening) would do in a frigid place like Vermont.

    • DD More says:

      What those couple of degrees may do is unfreeze the resident’s brains and make them smart enough to spend their own money and put the ruling class out of work.

  8. Billy Liar says:

    Well, it’s obvious isn’t it. Alaska needs some more ice to weigh it down. That should fix the falling sea levels.

  9. I don’t think even Obama’s advisers are making these claims. He’s making it all up himself. What a complete piece of shit.

    He wants us to surrender our guns, and he sends weapons to the Saudis. I have an idea….take my butcher knives and send them to the Moslems, that’s what they use anyway, and let me keep my fowling piece.

  10. darrylb says:

    Anyone know what Barrow in Autumn is so skewed from the rest?

  11. Henry P says:

    Here is some interesting data from Alaska, going back to 1942, from the Elmendorf Airforce base in Anchorage
    The data showing mean, maximum and minimum [in that order] that I have is still good,

    1942 2.5 7 -1.4
    1943 2.8 7.4 -1.1
    1944 2.7 7.2 -1.3
    1945 1.9 6.4 -2
    1946 1.3 6 -2.8
    1947 2.7 7.4 -1.2
    1948 0.9 5.8 -3.3
    1949 1.4 6 -2.7
    1950 1 6.1 -3.3
    1951 1.5 6 -2.3
    1952 2.5 6.9 -1.1
    1953 3 7.4 -0.8
    1954 2 6.2 -1.5
    1955 1.1 5 -2.2
    1956 0.4 4.5 -2.9
    1957 3.8 7.9 0.5
    1958 3.1 6.9 -0.1
    1959 2 6.5 -1.7
    1960 3 7.2 -0.4
    1961 0.8 4.7 -2.7
    1962 1.9 6 -1.5
    1963 2.7 6.5 -0.7
    1964 1 5 -2.5
    1965 1.1 5 -2.2
    1966 1.8 5.8 -1.4
    1967 2.6 6.6 -0.9
    1968 1.9 5.7 -1.6
    1969 2.9 7 -0.7
    1970 1.8 5.7 -1.6
    1971 1.5 5.4 -2
    1972 1.5 5.4 -2
    1973 1.2 5.1 -2.3
    1974 2.1 6.2 -1.5
    1975 0.3 4.6 -3.4
    1976 2.1 6.1 -1.7
    1977 3.2 7 -0.3
    1978 2.9 6.5 -0.3
    1979 2.5 6.3 -1
    1980 1.5 5.3 -1.8
    1981 3.8 7.4 0.4
    1982 1.1 4.9 -2.4
    1983 2.2 6.1 -1.3
    1984 2.5 6.5 -1.1
    1985 1.6 5.5 -2.1
    1986 2.8 6.6 -0.7
    1987 3.4 7.2 -0.1
    1988 3.3 7 0
    1989 1.9 5.8 -1.6
    1990 1.8 6.1 -2
    1991 2.1 6.1 -1.6
    1992 1.5 5.8 -2.5
    1993 4.1 8.9 0
    1994 2.3 7.3 -1.8
    1995 2.6 7.7 -1.6
    1996 0.9 6.5 -3.6
    1997 3 7.9 -1.3
    1998 2.6 7.4 -1.4
    1999 1.5 6.6 -2.7
    2000 3.8 8.8 -0.4
    2001 3.1 7.9 -0.9
    2002 3.91 8.77 -0.34
    2003 3.9 8.5 -0.2
    2004 3.7 8.7 -0.6
    2005 4.37 9.43 0.09
    2006 2.1 6.7 -1.9
    2007 2.7 7.4 -1.5
    2008 1.2 5.2 -2.5
    2009 2.3 6.7 -1.6
    2010 2.6 7 -1.2
    2011 2.3 6.6 -1.8
    2012 0.8 5.5 -3.3
    2013 3 7.4 -1.2
    2014 4 8.7 -1

    but it seems [to me] that the original source of my data has been severely corrupted.

    To summarize the results,
    means: +0.014K/annum since 1942
    that is [still] 1K warmer now than it was in 1942
    However, looking at it from 2000 it is -0.105K/annum
    that is -1.5K cooler then it was in 2000…..

  12. Henry P says:

    well, what do know…
    two interesting hockey sticks making the picture complete.

  13. Henry P says:

    sorry,
    that did not came out right.
    here it is

    data results run until 2012

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s