UN Predicted 1.25 Degrees Warming From 1990 To 2015

In 1990, the UN IPCC predicted 0.5 degrees warming per decade, which would mean 1.25 degrees by the year 2015.

2015-10-22-04-36-542015-10-22-04-36-3924 Aug 1990, Page 11 – at Newspapers.com

Satellites show that atmospheric temperatures now are almost identical to what they were in 1990. There has been essentially no warming over the past 25 years.

Image 4

Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs

For how many decades is the IPCC going to be allowed to repeat the same lies?


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to UN Predicted 1.25 Degrees Warming From 1990 To 2015

  1. craigm350 says:

    Reblogged this on WeatherAction News and commented:
    I saw a similar report from the early 1980’s. How many more decades of public funded failure must we endure?

  2. According to UN Players Al Gore & Obama, in our neck of the woods, we should be using a row boat for transportation. Instead, the rowboat is being used as a planter. It’s all about Control & $$$$ for the NWO & as long as UN has willing participants echoing it’s propaganda, it will endure.

  3. Gail Combs says:

    The UN will repeat the lie until they get the world to agree to a world tax of 1% GDP. The USA for being a ‘capitalist villian’ will be taxed at a higher rate with a planned rate hike to 1 trillion per year!

    So say good by to the USA. Barack Obama is about to make her a vassal state of the UN. As a vassal state she will be THE major cash cow for the unelected very corrupt World Politburo until all of her assets have been stripped and the UN is in full control of her people.

    Wiki says “The existence of the Politburo ended in 1991 with the breakup of the Soviet Union” looks like Wiki is wrong and Oliver is right. Stalin won.

    Shocking Revelations About the Climate Treaty Aren’t Simply Alarming

    You need to know who Rachel Kyte is because she is leading the financing of the global climate change initiative and she is an avowed leftist who spoke honestly recently at a Soros-Podesta funded conference at the New Republic, an extremely far-left online publication.

    She is planning for global governance by the U.N. members, governance which will be funded with hundreds of billions of dollars from the U.S. with side agreements to keep the money flowing in perpetuity, and finally, this new global government will manage the world’s economy and land use.

    Rachel Kyte is World Bank Group Vice President and Special Envoy for Climate Change. Ms. Kyte is the leading figure for the World Bank Group in efforts to campaign for an ambitious agreement at the 21st Convention of the Parties of the UNFCC this December and she wants U.S. dollars to fund most of it.

    Politico announced Saturday that Barack Obama will proceed on climate change aggressively.

    In December, he will attend the Paris summit on climate change and he has made it clear that he has every intention of unilaterally signing a treaty, which he will call an agreement, and which will force a massive redistribution from Americans and American corporations to developing countries whose leaders are communist, socialist and otherwise dictatorial leaders.

    One also has to remember what the IMF said about the USA:

    The International Monetary Fund (IMF) quietly dropped a bomb in its October Fiscal Monitor Report. Titled “Taxing Times,” …

    “The sharp deterioration of the public finances in many countries has revived interest in a “capital levy”— a one-off tax on private wealth—as an exceptional measure to restore debt sustainability. The appeal is that such a tax, if it is implemented before avoidance is possible and there is a belief that it will never be repeated, does not distort behavior (and may be seen by some as fair). … The conditions for success are strong, but also need to be weighed against the risks of the alternatives, which include repudiating public debt or inflating it away. … The tax rates needed to bring down public debt to precrisis levels, moreover, are sizable: reducing debt ratios to end-2007 levels would require (for a sample of 15 euro area countries) a tax rate of about 10 percent on households with positive net wealth. (page 49)”

    Note three takeaways. First, IMF economists know there are not enough rich people to fund today’s governments even if 100 percent of the assets of the 1 percent were expropriated. That means that all households with positive net wealth—everyone with retirement savings or home equity—would have their assets plundered under the IMF’s formulation.

    Second, such a repudiation of private property will not pay off Western governments’ debts or fund budgets going forward. It will merely “restore debt sustainability,” allowing free-spending sovereigns to keep tapping the bond markets until the next crisis comes along—for which stronger measures will be required, of course.

    Third, should politicians fail to muster the courage to engage in this kind of wholesale robbery, the only alternative scenario the IMF posits is public debt repudiation and hyperinflation. Structural reform proposals for the Ponzi-scheme entitlement programs that are bankrupting us are nowhere to be seen.


    Also see:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s