“All Muslims Believe In Stoning Adulterers And Executing Homosexuals”

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

38 Responses to “All Muslims Believe In Stoning Adulterers And Executing Homosexuals”

  1. I. Lou Minotti says:

    But on the other hand, sex with goats is OK! (IDF drone video):

    http://moonbattery.com/?p=48806

  2. God (I mean Allah) doesn’t condone homosexualism, but he keeps on making them anyway. Makes perfect sense.

    • irtfyblog says:

      God makes them male and female and for that reason a man shall leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife. God never made them homosexuals…Satan did that.

      • You are a complete idiot. Satan made homosexuals? You deserve to be stoned for being a f’ing moron.

        • AndyG55 says:

          Nah, just send him to jail with the big boys.

        • irtfyblog says:

          YOU’RE THE IDIOT YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT. YOU AND ALL THE OTHER ASSWIPES LIKE YOU. SATAN IS A LIAR AND SO ARE ALL THE HOMOS IN THE WORLD, THEREFORE GOD DIDN’T CREATE…SATAN DID. SO FUCK OFF ASSHOLE!!!

        • Can you guys kiss and make up? Even the Pakistanis get along with their donkeys and you people can’t? How are we going to get world peace like this?

        • Marsh says:

          irtfyblog :: Generally I make allowances for those that are on the spectrum “ASD” but we all have our limits with extremists ; pontificating their obsessive religious dogma…
          One has to Question which God you follow ; given your intolerance and prejudice..? It’s likely “Allah” , you have the traits and even your photo has been beheaded..!

        • AndyG55 says:

          Wow, anger issues… much !!

          lol !!!

      • catweazle666 says:

        Oh dear irtfyblog , you’ve forgotten to take your nice antipsychotics again, nurse will be cross.

  3. Marsh says:

    Islam is the worst Religion for tolerance ; Sharia law makes Muslims incompatible with infidels.
    The Koran is a holy book,, however it also has all the vestiges & harsh writings from a war lord. Anyone taking all such advisory,”ayahs” literally & act accordingly ; contravene modern laws.

    IF WE COULD JUST FIGURE OUT WHO’S CAUSING THE PROBLEM —

    Let’s see, do I understand this thing correctly?

    The Paris Killers were Muslim
    The Shoe Bomber was a Muslim
    The Beltway Snipers were Muslims
    The Fort Hood Shooter was a Muslim
    The underwear Bomber was a Muslim
    The U.S.S. Cole Bombers were Muslims
    The Madrid Train Bombers were Muslims
    The Bafi Nightclub Bombers were Muslims
    The London Subway Bombers were Muslims
    The Moscow Theater Attackers were Muslims
    The Boston Marathon Bombers were Muslims
    The Pan-Am flight #93 Bombers were Muslims
    The Air France Entebbe Hijackers were Muslims
    The Iranian Embassy Takeover, was by Muslims
    The Beirut U.S. Embassy bombers were Muslims
    The Libyan U.S. Embassy Attack was by Muslims
    The Buenos Aires Suicide Bombers were Muslims
    The Israeli Olympic Team Attackers were Muslims
    The Kenyan U.S, Embassy Bombers were Muslims
    The Saudi, Khobar Towers Bombers were Muslims
    The Beirut Marine Barracks bombers were Muslims
    The Besian Russian School Attackers were Muslims
    The first World Trade Center Bombers were Muslims
    The Bombay & Mumbai India Attackers were Muslims
    The Achille Lauro Cruise Ship Hijackers were Muslims
    The September 11th 2001 Airline Hijackers were Muslims

    Think of it:

    Buddhists living with Hindus = No Problem
    Hindus living with Christians = No Problem
    Hindus living with Jews = No Problem
    Christians living with Shintos = No Problem
    Shintos living with Confucians = No Problem
    Confucians living with Baha’is = No Problem
    Baha’is living with Jews = No Problem
    Jews living with Atheists = No Problem
    Atheists living with Buddhists = No Problem
    Buddhists living with Sikhs = No Problem
    Sikhs living with Hindus = No Problem
    Hindus living with Baha’is = No Problem
    Baha’is living with Christians = No Problem
    Christians living with Jews = No Problem
    Jews living with Buddhists = No Problem
    Buddhists living with Shintos = No Problem
    Shintos living with Atheists = No Problem
    Atheists living with Confucians = No Problem
    Confusians living with Hindus = No Problem

    ***WHEREAS***

    Muslims living with Hindus = Problem
    Muslims living with Buddhists = Problem
    Muslims living with Christians = Problem
    Muslims living with Jews = Problem
    Muslims living with Sikhs = Problem
    Muslims living with Baha’is = Problem
    Muslims living with Shintos = Problem
    Muslims living with Atheists = Problem
    MUSLIMS LIVING WITH MUSLIMS = BIG PROBLEM

    • Gail Combs says:

      It is very very simple.

      If you believe in the teachings written in the Koran you are either a terrorist or you are lying as you wait to become strong enough in numbers to become terrorists.

      I am posting the Arabic as well as the English translation but it may not show. (A trial preview at Jo Nova’s did show the Arabic.)
      >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

      MUSLIMS On the Practice of Lying:

      “The Tuqyah [practice of deception, lying or concealment for expediency]
      is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” Allah said,

      [وَيُحَذِّرُكُمُ اللَّهُ نَفْسَهُ]

      The Prohibition of Supporting the Disbelievers

      Allah prohibited His believing servants from becoming supporters of the disbelievers, or to take them as comrades with whom they develop friendships, rather than the believers. Allah warned against such behavior when He said,

      [وَمَن يَفْعَلْ ذَلِكَ فَلَيْسَ مِنَ اللَّهِ فِي شَىْءٍ]

      (And whoever does that, will never be helped by Allah in any way) meaning, whoever commits this act that Allah has prohibited, then Allah will discard him. Similarly, Allah said,

      [يأَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ ءَامَنُواْ لاَ تَتَّخِذُواْ عَدُوِّى وَعَدُوَّكُمْ أَوْلِيَآءَ تُلْقُونَ إِلَيْهِمْ بِالْمَوَدَّةِ]

      (O you who believe! Take not My enemies and your enemies as friends, showing affection towards them), until,

      [وَمَن يَفْعَلْهُ مِنكُمْ فَقَدْ ضَلَّ سَوَآءَ السَّبِيلِ]

      Allah said next,

      [إِلاَ أَن تَتَّقُواْ مِنْهُمْ تُقَـةً]

      (unless you indeed fear a danger from them) meaning, except those believers who in some areas or times fear for their safety from the disbelievers. In this case, such believers are allowed to show friendship to the disbelievers outwardly, but never inwardly. For instance, Al-Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda’ said, “We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.” Al-Bukhari said that Al-Hasan said, “The Tuqyah is allowed until the Day of Resurrection.” Allah said,

      [وَيُحَذِّرُكُمُ اللَّهُ نَفْسَهُ]

      (And Allah warns you against Himself.) meaning, He warns you against His anger and the severe torment He prepared for those who give their support to His enemies, and those who have enmity with His friends,

      [وَإِلَى اللَّهِ الْمَصِيرُ]

      Allah encourages the believers to show enmity to the idolators and to dissociate from them, affirming that they do not deserve to enjoy a covenant of peace, because of their Shirk in Allah and disbelief in Allah’s Messenger .

      If these disbelievers have a chance to defeat Muslims, they will cause great mischief, leave nothing unharmed, disregard the ties of kinship and the sanctity of their vows. `Ali bin Abi Talhah, `Ikrimah and Al-`Awfi narrated that Ibn `Abbas said, “Ill means kinship, while, Dhimmah means covenant.” Ad-Dahhak and As-Suddi said similarly.

      [اشْتَرَوْاْ بِـَايَـتِ اللَّهِ ثَمَنًا قَلِيلاً فَصَدُّواْ عَن سَبِيلِهِ إِنَّهُمْ سَآءَ مَا كَانُواْ يَعْمَلُونَ – لاَ يَرْقُبُونَ فِى مُؤْمِنٍ إِلاًّ وَلاَ ذِمَّةً وَأُوْلَـئِكَ هُمُ الْمُعْتَدُونَ – فَإِن تَابُواْ وَأَقَامُواْ الصَّلَوةَ وَءاتَوُاْ الزَّكَوةَ فَإِخْوَانُكُمْ فِي الدِّينِ وَنُفَصِّلُ الاٌّيَـتِ لِقَوْمٍ يَعْلَمُونَ ]

      Allah says, if the idolators with whom you conducted peace treaties for an appointed term break

      [أَيْمَـنِهِمْ]

      (their oaths) meaning, terms of their treaties, and covenants

      [وَطَعَنُواْ فِى دِينِكُمْ]

      (and attack your religion…) with disapproval and criticism, it is because of this that one who curses the Messenger, peace be upon him, or attacks the religion of Islam by way of criticism and disapproval, they are to be fought. This is why Allah said afterwards,

      [فَقَـتِلُواْ أَئِمَّةَ الْكُفْرِ إِنَّهُمْ لاَ أَيْمَـنَ لَهُمْ لَعَلَّهُمْ يَنتَهُونَ]

      Therefore, strike the swords upon the parts that contain the devil, for by Allah, it is better to me to kill one of these people than to kill seventy other men. This is because Allah said,

      [فَقَـتِلُواْ أَئِمَّةَ الْكُفْرِ]

      (then fight (you) against the leaders of disbelief.)”

      [أَلاَ تُقَـتِلُونَ قَوْماً نَّكَثُواْ أَيْمَـنَهُمْ وَهَمُّواْ بِإِخْرَاجِ الرَّسُولِ وَهُم بَدَءُوكُمْ أَوَّلَ مَرَّةٍ أَتَخْشَوْنَهُمْ فَاللَّهُ أَحَقُّ أَن تَخْشَوْهُ إِن كُنتُم مُّؤُمِنِينَ – قَـتِلُوهُمْ يُعَذِّبْهُمُ اللَّهُ بِأَيْدِيكُمْ وَيُخْزِهِمْ وَيَنْصُرْكُمْ عَلَيْهِمْ وَيَشْفِ صُدُورَ قَوْمٍ مُّؤْمِنِينَ – وَيُذْهِبْ غَيْظَ قُلُوبِهِمْ وَيَتُوبُ اللَّهُ عَلَى مَن يَشَآءُ وَاللَّهُ عَلِيمٌ حَكِيمٌ ]

      Originally found at: http://www.tafsir.com/default.asp?sid=3&tid=8052
      Completely scrubbed from the Wayback machine.

      Muslims on the subject of Peace treaties:

      What this essentially means is that Muslims living in the West can pursue a course of peace with their unbelieving neighbors since the latter clearly outnumber the former. Yet when the Muslims muster enough power and wealth to overcome the “infidels” they will be forced to abandon peace and seek to conquer the disbelievers instead.

      In particular, this Islamic teaching destroys any basis for trust in peace treaties made by Muslims. They are never thought to be lasting but only until such time as the Muslims feel strong enough that it is to their advantage to break the peace and attack the unbelievers again. For this reason Islam does not know genuine peace treaties with non-Muslims, i.e. peace treaties that end war once and for all, but only temporary truces that can be dissolved at any time. Is it any wonder that Muhammad is quoted as saying that war is deceit!

      the Quran permits Muslims to accept a peace treaty from the unbelievers whom they are fighting:

      But if they incline to peace, you also incline to it, and (put your) trust in God. Verily, He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower. S. 8:61 Hilali-Khan

      So be not weak and ask not for peace (from the enemies of Islâm), while you are having the upper hand. God is with you, and will never decrease the reward of your good deeds. S. 47:35 Hilali-Khan

      Muslims are commanded not to seek peace with the unbelievers, provided that they are the more dominant party! As the tafsir of Ibn Abbas states:

      (So do not falter) do not weaken, O believer, upon fighting the disbelievers (and cry out for peace) and it is said this means: for Islam before fighting (when you (will be) the uppermost) when you are the victorious and the ultimate consequence will be in your favour, (and Allah is with you) He helps you to defeat your enemy, (and He will not grudge (the reward of) your actions) and He will not diminish the works in which you engage during Jihad. (Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs; online source; bold and underline emphasis ours)

      Originally from
      http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/peace_or_not.html
      But as usual it has been rewritten and the back copies on the WayBack have been changed to be the same as the current.

    • Gail Combs says:

      A case in point with an American convert:

      The Making of a TERRORIST

      WE ARE COMING FOR YOU

      We will target you in your homes.
      We will target you in your businesses.
      We will target you in your synagogues and your churches.
      You are the enemies of Islam.
      For the sake of Allah we are coming for you.

      The words of Islamic bomb plotter Derrick Shareef.
      “…Shareef’s friend was actually an FBI informant who recorded Shareef plotting to detonate the grenades at Rockford’s Cherry Vale mall during the height of the Christmas shopping season.

      A born and bred American intent on killing his fellow countrymen. The type of person, Homeland Security says, is being recruited by foreign-born terrorists….”

      • catweazle666 says:

        Gail Combes:

        WE ARE COMING FOR YOU

        We will target you in your homes.
        We will target you in your businesses.
        We will target you in your synagogues and your churches.
        You are the enemies of Islam.
        For the sake of Allah we are coming for you.

        Sounds like Greenpi$$!

        “We know who you are.
        We know where you live.
        We know where you work.
        And we be many, but you be few.”

        Gene Hashmi, communications director, Greenpeace India.

    • DD More says:

      Gail, everyone needs to confirm which word it is, to be totally understood. Found in looking for “Peace Treaty” defined in Arabic.

      For it turns out there are three different words in Arabic for “peace.” Only one of them is for real. And it’s not the one used at Annapolis, just like it wasn’t the one used at Camp David II, Oslo, or Camp David I. All failed a linguistic test, a test which any real Arab-Israeli agreement must pass, the Test of Suhl.
      The three Arabic words translated as “peace” in English are salaam, hudna, and suhl.

      Salaam is the peace of submission. It’s the drawn out pronunciation of “slm” in “Islam,” (written Arabic has no vowels) the Arabic word for submission and obedience, and in “Moslem” or “Muslim,” the Arabic word for “one who submits.” There is peace, salaam, among Moslems when they submit to Allah and the teachings of the Koran. There is peace, salaam, between Moslems and kafirs, infidels, only when the latter submit to the rule of the former. In other words, salaam, Moslem peace, is not the absence of violence as it is for us, but the absence of disobedience. Just like it was for the Communists.

      Hudna, the second Arabic word translated in English as “peace,” means cease-fire, a temporary truce. When the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, for example, proposes a hudna with Israel, it’s hailed in the Western media as a peace proposal. It is instead a tactical, temporary break in hostilities, giving Moslems time to re-organize, re-arm, then renew the Jihad against the kafirs when they can be most caught off-guard.

      Suhl, the third Arabic term for “peace,” is the most interesting, the one we must insist on Arabs using, the one they always avoid and refuse to use. Suhl means reconciliation.
      The Encyclopedia of Islam describes sulh as a concept of Islamic sharia law: The purpose of sulh is to end conflict and hostility among believers so that they may conduct their relationships in peace and amity….In Islamic law, sulh is a form of contract (aqd), legally binding on both the individual and community levels. Note that it applies only between believers. Once again, it’s deuces wild with unbelievers.
      http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/009345.html

      Words mean something, even in arabic.

      • Gail Combs says:

        The correct term is ‘Ceasefire’ and it is used so the muslims have time to build up strength before they attack again. It is just another weapon in their word against non-muslims.

        Muslims on the subject of Peace treaties:

        In particular, this Islamic teaching destroys any basis for trust in peace treaties made by Muslims. They are never thought to be lasting but only until such time as the Muslims feel strong enough that it is to their advantage to break the peace and attack the unbelievers again. For this reason Islam does not know genuine peace treaties with non-Muslims, i.e. peace treaties that end war once and for all, but only temporary truces that can be dissolved at any time. Is it any wonder that Muhammad is quoted as saying that war is deceit!

        The Quran permits Muslims to accept a peace treaty from the unbelievers whom they are fighting:

        But if they incline to peace, you also incline to it, and (put your) trust in God. Verily, He is the All-Hearer, the All-Knower. S. 8:61 Hilali-Khan

        So be not weak and ask not for peace (from the enemies of Islâm), while you are having the upper hand. God is with you, and will never decrease the reward of your good deeds. S. 47:35 Hilali-Khan

        Muslims are commanded not to seek peace with the unbelievers, provided that they are the more dominant party! As the tafsir of Ibn Abbas states:

        (So do not falter) do not weaken, O believer, upon fighting the disbelievers (and cry out for peace) and it is said this means: for Islam before fighting (when you (will be) the uppermost) when you are the victorious and the ultimate consequence will be in your favour, (and Allah is with you) He helps you to defeat your enemy, (and He will not grudge (the reward of) your actions) and He will not diminish the works in which you engage during Jihad. (Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs; online source; bold and underline emphasis ours)

        Originally at: http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/Contra/peace_or_not.html
        But wiped from the internet.

  4. DD More says:

    But it is okay when they are doing it.

    KABUL, Afghanistan — In his last phone call home, Lance Cpl. Gregory Buckley Jr. told his father what was troubling him: From his bunk in southern Afghanistan, he could hear Afghan police officers sexually abusing boys they had brought to the base.

    “At night we can hear them screaming, but we’re not allowed to do anything about it,” the Marine’s father, Gregory Buckley Sr., recalled his son telling him before he was shot to death at the base in 2012. He urged his son to tell his superiors. “My son said that his officers told him to look the other way because it’s their culture.”
    http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/21/world/asia/us-soldiers-told-to-ignore-afghan-allies-abuse-of-boys.html?_r=0

    And their outlook has not changed for a long time. William Eaton was involved with the Barbary Pirates.

    Eaton’s stark and stereotyping view of Islam and Muslims can be seen when he describes these segments of society as being not only “abject slaves to the despotism of their government,” but also “humiliated by tyranny, the worst of all tyranny, the despotism of priestcraft. They live in more solemn fear of the frowns of a bigot who has been dead and rotten above a thousand years, than of a living despot whose frown would cost them their lives.”
    73 William Eaton, 10 August 1799, 123.

  5. Steve Case says:

    I have to decide if the video is real or not. The man at the podium asks a question, and it looks like the audience is responding to that question. But maybe it’s clever splicing. The question could have been, “Raise your hand if you would like to visit Disneyland?”

    I suspect it’s real, but I really don’t know.

  6. Bill Junga says:

    The civilized world is being pushed. Soon, it will be in the kill or be killed mode. It’s not going to be pretty.

  7. Psalmon says:

    Why commit adultery when you they have rape or sex slaves!

    Result: Women turn out in droves to vote for Hillary.

  8. au1corsair says:

    Compared to the Green Agenda, Islam is harmless. For example, the United Nations guarantees reproductive freedom. Globalists (the children of statists) practice forced sterilization on mass scales, when they cannot actually murder thousands at a time. The link below mentions only women being sterilized–but any “undesirable” is the target. Don’t forget that failure to buy into the Global Warming pseudo-science means that you are feeble-minded and evil.

    http://faculty.webster.edu/woolflm/forcedsterilization.html

  9. Psalmon says:

    Muslims are ramping up and broadening their attacks because they are worried the West will destroy itself before they get a chance to.

  10. Climatism says:

    Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
    If that was the ‘non-extremist’ get together, imagine the ‘extremist’ powwow.

  11. Ric Werme says:

    Q: How is Islam like a roach motel?

    A: you can check in, but you can’t check out.

    From http://www.wikiislam.net/wiki/Islam_and_Apostasy

    In Islam, the rejection in part (of any of the pillars, or individual principles of Islam), or discarding the faith as a whole, amounts to apostasy.[1] The punishment for apostasy in the Islamic faith is death. Though it may be argued that this is not clear through the Qur’an alone, scholars have found justification for the penalty from within its pages, and there are also numerous Sahih (authentic) hadiths confirming this punishment as attested by Prophet Muhammad. In Sahih Bukhari, we see it as “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him’”,[2] and it was also one of only three reasons given by him where killing a Muslim is permitted.[3]

  12. OrganicFool says:

    “Whomever is not guilty of sin may cast the first stone.”

  13. Peter says:

    I note that at 20 Nov 2015 this video is no longer available due to copyright claim by Det Islamske Netverk. But anyone who saw it would never again believe in moderate muslims. (I notice spell check wants to dignify muslims with a capital M). That you cannot tell who is going to inflict harm on others, means you have to tar all muslims as criminals i.e be prejudiced; they’re not innocent until proven guilty; the disdain for making collective/ global judgments need to be dropped

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s