Record Crushing Fraud From NOAA And NASA Ahead Of Paris

Gavin and Tom delivered their fraud right on schedule ahead of Paris, just as I predicted they would. They claim that October had the highest temperature anomaly ever recorded for any month.

2015-11-19-03-42-18

2015-11-19-03-26-13Record-crushing October keeps Earth on track for hottest year in 2015 – The Washington Post

Somehow, they managed to calculate Earth’s temperature within 0.01 degrees – even though they had no temperature data for about half of the land surface, including none in Greenland and very little in Africa or Antarctica.

201510

201510.gif (990×765)

This kind of mind-blowing malfeasance would get them fired and probably escorted out of the building by security at many engineering companies.

Satellites cover almost the entire planet several times a day, and they showed that October had only the 25th highest monthly anomaly, and that the first ten months of 1998 all had a higher anomaly than October 2015.

2015-11-19-03-05-12RSS_TS_channel_TLT_Global_Land_And_Sea_v03_3.txt

Not only do NASA and NOAA make up fake data for much of the planet, but they massively tamper with their existing data, like these stations in Siberia where they have cooled the past nearly two degrees C since 2012 – and now claim that it is two degrees C above normal.

Zyrjanka2012-2015

2012 version :Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
2015 version: Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis

 

The graph below shows the magnitude of their data tampering since 2012.

2015-11-19-04-16-48

By tampering with the station baseline, they created the large anomalies. Then they double down their fraud by smearing their bogus anomalies across 1200 km of missing data. This is needed to create their required fraudulent record temperature claims ahead of Paris.

nmaps

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

47 Responses to Record Crushing Fraud From NOAA And NASA Ahead Of Paris

  1. eliza says:

    Unfortunately the data presented here is far more damming than anything Lamar Smith will squeeze out of them (NOAA) but of course no one is noticing. They might notice what Lamar will get though because of press coverage. Eventually the truth will out but it will take years LOL

    • If anything this false 1C claim will just make them look worse – particularly when compared with the satellites which show nothing of the sort.

      • omanuel says:

        Our leaders are now desperate and dangerous, like animals trapped in the web of their own deceit.

        The inevitable conclusion was written in the oldest scriptures centuries ago:
        TRUTH IS VICTORIOUS, NEVER UNTRUTH

    • Tom Robbins says:

      Yes, the truth will come out – BUT these jerks will claim, even though they did NOTHING, that they saved the planet, and the faithful will actaully believe the nonsense – but wait until we hit that mini-ice age…I wish we had a better sense of history – I blame institutions of so-called “HIGHER” (and probably High indeed) learning – 97% liberal professors – what could go wrong?

  2. AndyG55 says:

    See all that “heat” in Australia…. sorry, I don’t think so !!

    In UAH for Australia, on a “year to end of October” basis, 2015 is 18th out 37 in the satellite data.

    2013……0.668 ……1
    1998……0.657 ……2
    2005……0.632 ……3
    2002……0.631 ……4
    2007……0.488 ……5
    2004……0.473 ……6
    2009……0.448 ……7
    2014……0.411 ……8
    2006……0.402 ……9
    2003……0.287 ……10
    1991……0.266 ……11
    1980……0.242 ……12
    1999……0.234 ……13
    2010……0.225 ……14
    1988……0.194 ……15
    1996……0.124 ……16
    2011……0.123 ……17
    2015……0.097……18

  3. Justa Joe says:

    We’re supposed to believe that this is coincidentally prior to their big “climate” CON-fab in Paris? This October’s weather was as typical as typical can be… FOH

    • NOAAgate is about to blow. Lamar has the goods and the whistleblowers are so fed up with the corruption that they’ve jumped ship to the other side. And now those who can, have a choice: remain and take the blame & shame – or spill the beans.

  4. Gail Combs says:

    Dang, I just posted this on the other thread:
    https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/11/19/exxon-prosecuted-for-agreeing-with-the-83-consensus/#comment-553558

    Looks Like we LOST ALREADY GUYS! They hustled the agreement through the back door and also gave it teeth that applies to ANY treaty the USA now or in the past signs!

    No wonder there are 5,544 pages and the negotiations were conducted behind closed doors with no oversight by the peons who get saddled with the decisions.

    • David A says:

      …which makes the millions of Islamic “refugees” soon to be a US problem, regardless of any we receive directly, as this makes us essentially borderless. A new president and attorney general could reverse all this very shortly but for now this will require rebellion by the states and if a miracle occurs, by a cowardly congress.

  5. ed k says:

    In theory , even if there is a 1 degree temp rise per century, every month can be the hottest ever

    • rah says:

      I really don’t know why they bother with this 10th of a degree stuff. Just up the antie and go for broke. The same people that defend them now would still defend them no matter if the suckers said it was the hottest month or year on record by 5 or 10 degrees. Why piddle around? They have already gone well past the point of plausible deniability in their fraud.

  6. Climatism says:

    Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
    With current record Antarctic ice mass and sea ice growth and record Arctic sea ice growth, inc Greenland, it’s no wonder climate criminals, Schmidt and Peterson had to make places like Australia 5 degrees *C* above normal !?

  7. pinroot says:

    Just curious, but what’s the accuracy of the instruments/thermometers? I ask because there is no way you can get 0.01 degree accuracy for a global temperature if your instruments only have an accuracy of, say, 0.1 degree or so. At least that’s what i was taught in math class. Not that it matters, especially to the average dumbed down person on the street.

    • Gail Combs says:

      From my notes.
      On Thermometer resolution, and ERROR
      http://pugshoes.blogspot.se/2010/10/metrology.html

      http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/11420

      Back in 1918, the text book by Willis Isbister Milham I have linked to on occasion found the liquid-in-glass thermometers used good to 0.5F and the best thermometer, a ventilated thermometer invented by Assman at Berlin in 1887, “will determine the real air temperature correctly to a tenth of a degree.”

      The MMTS sensors used have an accuracy of “generally” +/-0.5°F according to NOAA
      MMTS Specs: http://www.srh.noaa.gov/srh/dad/coop/specs-1.html

      This paper estimate error bands:
      http://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/uploads/media/E___E_algorithm_error_07-Limburg.pdf

      “By knowing this the minimum uncertainty for every annual global mean temperature should be expanded not only to the value described here i.e. with 95 % confidence interval to ± 1.084 °C, but should be at least 3 to 5 times wider. Thus, the average global temperature anomaly for the last 150 years is dissolved in a wide noisy uncertainty band, which is much wider than the whole assumed variation of the 20th century.”

      A peer-reviewed study Sensor and Electronic Biases/Errors in Air Temperature Measurements in Common Weather Station Networks by Lin et. al. concluded:

      Therefore, the RSS errors in the MMTS are from 0.31° to 0.62°C from temperature -40°C to -50°C (Fig. 5)… For the HO-1088 sensor, the self-heating error is quite serious and can make temperature 0.5°C higher under 1 m/s airflow, which is slightly less than the actual normal ventilation rate in the ASOS shield (Lin et al. 2001a). http://ams.allenpress.com/archive/1520-0426/21/7/pdf/i1520-0426-21-7-1025.pdf

      In the peer reviewed study “Air Temperature Comparison between the MMTS and the USCRN Temperature Systems” Hubbard et. al. concluded:

      Although the MMTS temperature records have been officially adjusted for cooler maxima and warmer minima in the USHCN dataset, the MMTS dataset in the United States will require further adjustment. In general, our study infers that the MMTS dataset has warmer maxima and cooler minima compared to the current USCRN air temperature system.” http://www.homogenisation.org/files/private/WG1/Bibliography/Applications/Applications%20(F-J)/hubbard_etal.pdf

      Klaus Hager carried out a study comparing MMTS and Glass thermometers side by side for a period of 8.5 years and found that the MMTS gave a mean difference that was 0.93C warmer. Klaus Hager is a 44-year veteran German meteorologist and wrote a peer-reviewed paper on his findings. http://wkserv.met.fu-berlin.de/Beilagen/2013/Autom%20WSt_Hager.pdf

      Now Dr. Bill Johnston a retired scientist has found the same problem with Australian MMTS temperature records and a lot more…
      On the quality of Australia’s temperature data by Dr. Bill (WH) Johnston.
      (Former NSW Department of Natural Resources Senior Research Scientist.)

      • gregole says:

        “…Thus, the average global temperature anomaly for the last 150 years is dissolved in a wide noisy uncertainty band, which is much wider than the whole assumed variation of the 20th century…”

        Uh-huh. Greatest problem facing humanity? No, not really. Just fools looking at noise and drawing conclusions. If there is a future for humanity, and I thing there is, future people are going to write volumes about this scam.

  8. Barbara says:

    I heard about the “record” world temp. for October on the radio this morning. I knew Steve and all of you posting today would be on top of it. Thanks for trying to spread a little truth!

    • rah says:

      It is all over all the news. As usual the press stenographers are doing what journalists do these days and report uncritically report whatever NOAA and NASA say with no vetting at all. I have no idea why they just don’t get rid of these so called “science journalists” and just digitize the press releases of NASA and NOAA except for the fact that the digitized message wouldn’t provide a pretty girl with nice T&As as most “science journalists” seem to be these days.

      • Talk about the poor choices we have. The alternative is being fed the same BS accompanied by images of Gavin’s Ts&A.

        • I shouldn’t have written that. I must run now and do something more pleasant to shake it off. I will try to distract myself by emptying the mouse traps and checking effluent levels in the septic tank.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Here is one to really make you lose your lunch!

          A Group of Kids Are Suing Obama Over Climate Change

          A group of 21 children and teenagers are suing the Obama administration over climate change, which Slate calls “next important civil rights struggle of the 21st century.”

          The kids aren’t going it alone, however. Their “guardian” is James Hansen, the former chief climate scientist for NASA. The lawsuit argues that the government’s inaction on climate change is a violation of their right to life, liberty and property. They are requesting the President to act immediately to protect the earth for the benefit of Americans, now and in the future…..

          I didn’t get any further, I had to make a run for it.

        • AndyG55 says:

          Let’s make those little kiddies live without all the mod-cons that are totally dependant on a good solid reliable power supply.

          Make them walk to school.. no mum to drop them off in the SUV.

          Take away their iPhones… see how long they last 😉

        • That won’t work, Andy. The climate guards would just get more appropriate analog devices …

          … denounce their mommies, and the whole climate collective would walk to school together …

  9. Billy Liar says:

    Expect Gavin to win some $100k ‘prize’ not long after Paris.

  10. Bill H says:

    Tony,

    Your post is very confusing. You say you are are providing evidence of fraud by both NOAA and NASA, yet the only evidence is a map taken from the NOAA website on the day NASA/GISS released its global data. All this means is that NOAA had only posted THEIR data for half the Earth’s land surface on 17th October, two days prior to their publication. You show no evidence at all for the NASA data only having 50% coverage when it was published.

    This looks like carelessness on your part. It also indicates that your followers (including, by extension the denizens of Tallbloke’s Talkshop) aren’t bothered by the possible unreliability of your claims, since they have accepted the truth of what you say without question.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s