Another Massive IPCC Fail – Autumn Snow Cover

The IPCC predicted a reduction in late autumn snow.

For the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA) model mean, at the end of the 21st century the projected reduction in the annual mean NH snow cover is 13% under the B2 scenario (ACIA, 2004). The individual model projections range from reductions of 9 to 17%. The actual reductions are greatest in spring and late autumn/early winter, indicating a shortened snow cover season (ACIA, 2004).

10.3.3.2 Changes in Snow Cover and Frozen Ground – AR4 WGI Chapter 10: Global Climate Projections

November snow cover has been steadily increasing for 40 years, with all of the last seven years above the mean. This is caused by Arctic air pushing further and further south.

2015-12-02-05-45-23

Rutgers University Climate Lab :: Global Snow Lab

We had nine snow days last month in Boulder, topped only by 1991 after the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo. November snow occurs about twice as often as it did 100 years ago.

2015-12-02-05-49-14

The world’s best climate scientists are clueless buffoons who rely on incompetent interpretations of output from worthless software. COP 21 is based largely on the garbage these morons generate.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to Another Massive IPCC Fail – Autumn Snow Cover

  1. richard says:

    Not meaning to nitpick; would someone please tell the
    people reporting the weather, that you can’t have
    WINTER storms in the fall. My education is old fashioned
    so I believe the winter solstice is the first day of winter, and
    it falls late in December. I appreciate that these FALL storms
    are embarasing to them and their agenda, but can’t they
    tell it right just once??(or they are truly ignorant??).

  2. sfx2020 says:

    There seems to be so much denial and confusion about even weather, (thanks to the global warming hysteria of course), that no weather event can be just about weather any longer. Nothing has escaped the global warming meme.

    Everything is due to global warming, because they believe global warming is ALL THAT IS HAPPENING, so we have this incredibly idiotic filter that everything has to be passed through before it can be vomited up for the idiots of the world to swallow.

    It’s so bad, it’s affecting science.

    • gator69 says:

      It isn’t affecting science, it is replacing science, with religion.

      • sfx2020 says:

        “It isn’t affecting science, it is replacing science, with religion.”

        No, a lot of people still want to do real science. When you fuck with the actual data, it makes that impossible.

        • gator69 says:

          Of course there are many who long for and seek the truth, which is what “science” is all about. But those who replace data with what they “feel” or “believe” to be true, are replacing science with faith.

  3. Powers says:

    No, no listen to me! Don’t pay any attention to what is going on outside. listen to ME!

    I understand the AG of NY wants to start throwing people in jail with all this chicken little, sky falling, temperatures warming, epic failure of political science?

    This is how Dictatorships Operate. It is time for the average Joe and Jane to be very, very, afraid.

  4. “The world’s best climate scientists are clueless buffoons who rely on incompetent interpretations of output from worthless software”

    Damn, that’s funny. And 100% true.

  5. Andy DC says:

    Global warming causes less Autumn snowcover, but after further review, sometimes global warming causes more Autumn snowcover. Climate science has advanced SO much over the past few years and is SO much more sophisticated. Plus you can’t prove the advanced AL-Gore-Rhythms used by today’s climate scientists are a fraud, even if they obviously are!

    • Jason Calley says:

      Hey Andy! “Plus you can’t prove the advanced AL-Gore-Rhythms used by today’s climate scientists are a fraud, even if they obviously are!”

      I suspect that a lot of warmists do not realize that the word “prove” has several gradations of meaning. Mathematical proof, theological proof, legal proof, scientific proof, ordinary proof, etc. Evidence that suffices for one kind of proof may not be enough for another type of proof. For many warmists, no amount of evidence is enough to prove CAGW is even wrong, much less fraudulent.

      I have been told that geese will eat pork but cannot digest it. I passes through their system with no assimilation. True CAGW enthusuasts seem to do the same thing with facts and figures.

      • Gail Combs says:

        “I have been told that geese will eat pork but cannot digest it. I passes through their system with no assimilation. “

        I doubt that is true. Geese are primarily herbivores, but they sometimes eat small insects and fish. Biologist trying to find out what the main predators of ground nesting birds are found it was DEER!!! And then there was the chicken eating cow…

        Heck I have had a horse grab my ham and cheese sandwiches and have no problem and their stomachs are very delicate.

        It is the carnivores who have problems with veggies.

        • saveenergy says:

          Put some pork on a long fishing line, feed to first Goose, next day It’s popped out of other end, feed to second goose, repeat daily until you have a line of geese.

          When fun & mirth has subsided, simply pull line gently through in the natural direction.

  6. Jason Calley says:

    Typo: I = It

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s