Climate Alarmists Vs. Science

2015-12-02-06-33-092015-12-02-06-33-25

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to Climate Alarmists Vs. Science

  1. sfx2020 says:

    The thing that is doing the most damage to the idiots using scare tactics is the actual climate change taking place,

  2. It seems Peter Caltner’s scientific education consists of reading Marxist porn about “mutual penetration of opposites”. Every Marxist knew it would get cold in Tennessee because of global warming.

  3. QV says:

    The BBC is bombarding us in the UK with people giving examples of “climate change”, which are in reality examples of weather, and which go unchallenged.
    Do these people really believe that reducing CO2 emissions will end all extreme weather events and return us to an era of perfect weather, which never actually existed?
    I fear we cannot win against such ignorance.

    • The merely ignorant don’t go on the attack; dishonesty is also required for that. He, following Obama and the rest of the Insane Left (my term, and mine alone), is deliberately lying, claiming to know the truth while denying it, even when confronted directly with it. All who defend the “consensus” against the overwhelming facts, to the clear detriment to society and to truth itself, are traitors, to the idea of peaceful civilization itself.

      • kentclizbe says:

        Harry,

        Your attention and thinking about our opponents is commendable.

        However, terminology is really important.

        Let me try to convince you that your term is not useful: Insane Left

        First is the “left/right” paradigm. This is essentially meaningless. What is the line between left and right? What does the right believe that the left does not? Right morphs into left and left morphs into right as you examine them more closely. Our opponents do have a belief system–but “left” is not a helpful description of it.

        Then the assertion that they are “insane.” They clearly are not insane, nor are they morons, nor are they stupid, nor are they “-tards.” There are clearly some very, very smart people who subscribe to, and act on, the system of beliefs. Their actions are starkly sane–they have clear goals and are working very hard to achieve those goals–organizing, writing, communicating, manipulating and more. This is NOT how insane people act.

        Our opponents’ belief system is Politically Correct Progressivism. This term encompasses everything that they are, do, and believe. PC-Progs are engaged in a decades-long, cold-blooded, highly organized, clear-eyed struggle to destroy Normal-America–its culture, its people, its economy.

        Understanding them, their belief system, and their goals is the only way to counter-act them.

        Details:

        http://willingaccomplices.com/willing_accomplices/videos

        • QV says:

          I agree, calling people names doesn’t work, it just turns people off and they stop listening.
          I was referring to people like Baroness Scotland who is Labour but as a member of the House of Lords, I wouldn’t describe as left-wing. I think she has been brainwashed however.
          On the World at One today, she was citing 6 hours of torrential rain in Dominica from Tropical storm “Erika” and floods in her own cottage as examples of climate change,
          http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b06qkl13
          (approx. 39 minutes in)
          Also:
          Here in relation to Erika, she claims “nobody knew it was coming”.
          http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p039wmhq

        • Gail Combs says:

          Harry, you can also add in my SWAG as to how and why this started. link

          In a nutshell, the elite/aristocracy controlled all property and all people for a thousand years. Then came the enlightenment and the peasants refused to be serfs any more challenging TPTB. In 1776 there was the American Revolution and that was followed by the French Revolution (1789 — 1799) That Revolution brought home the problem to the Aristocracy’s very doorstep. The elite panicked and scrambled with a way to get the peasants back under control. Enter Karl Marx stage left.

          I can’t prove it but I think Marx and his philosophy was a method for getting the peasants back under control. Notice the target is ALWAYS the The Middle Class ( bourgeoisie) and NOT the elite.

          “The bourgeoisie, wherever it has got the upper hand, has put an end to all feudal, patriarchal, idyllic relations. It has pitilessly torn asunder the motley feudal ties that bound man to his ‘natural superiors,’ and has left remaining no other nexus between man and man than naked self-interest, callous ‘cash payment.’ It has drowned the most heavenly ecstasies of religious fervor, of chivalrous enthusiasm, of philistine sentimentalism, in the icy water of egotistical calculation. It has resolved personal worth into exchange value, and in place of the numberless indefeasible chartered freedoms, has set up that single, unconscionable freedom—Free Trade. In one word, for exploitation, veiled by religious and political illusions, it has substituted naked, shameless, direct, brutal exploitation.

          The bourgeoisie has stripped of its halo every occupation hitherto honored and looked up to with reverent awe. It has converted the physician, the lawyer, the priest, the poet, the man of science, into its paid wage laborers. ― Karl Marx, The Communist Manifesto

        • kentclizbe says:

          QV,

          Yes, absolutely. “Brainwashed” is a true description of our opponents. They have been subjected to decades of influence messages, and are, in effect, programmed to believe what they believe. Breaking out of the influence bubble, and thinking for yourself is difficult. But not thinking for yourself does not make you insane–in fact, that approach to life is more “normal” than not!

          My response above was to Harry–who used the term “Insane Left” to describe our opponents.

          Applying terms to our opponents is potentially useful–but only if those terms are true.

          The “sleepers” among us awake when they realize that the PC-Prog reality is fake and based on lies. When they see that we speak the truth, they come around to reality.

          If we call PC-Progs “insane,” and “idiots,” and “stupid,” and the sleepers encounter those PC-Progs, and discover that the PC-Progs are actually smart, and sane, then we’ve done a great dis-service to the reality-based cause.

          We beat the communists because their entire belief system was a lie. And we told the truth. When sleepers from communist countries encountered reality, they awoke and rejected that belief system.

          Just so with climate fakers and climate realists. Sleepers awake every day to reality. We should make it easier for them, by focusing on reality, not on inventing new naughty names to call the fakers.

        • Zebo says:

          @Gail

          I think you don’t need(and won’t get) real proof that Karl Marx(& Moses Hess)
          were just Pawn of the elite,
          BUT
          there are many things pointing to that direction.

          1)Karl Marx was in Exile in?
          The powerhouse of World Banking=London.
          The city of London is an ,independent,autonom mini-state with own laws comparable to the vatican.

          2)Karl Marx was able to analyze many flaws of capitalism,
          but he was not able to see the elephant in the room,
          the most destructive tool and weapon of the elite=
          fake FIAT money and corporate interrest.
          (if you lend 10000 dollars with 7% interesst,within 100 years you’ll have 70.000 dollars debt,if you do the same with corporate interrest you’ll have almost 1 million debt)
          Marx did not see this because he was paid not to do so.

          3)Who are the kings of “the city of London”?
          (even the queen have to ask for permission if she wants to visiti the city og L.-
          you can read this even on wikipedia)
          The Rothschild.

          Who started the global warming hoax world wide?
          1992 Rio/UN-Maurice Strong and Edmund Rothschild.

          Who owns the FED since 1913?
          The Rothschild and Rockefellers+friends.

          Who is controlling the co2 exchange in Chicago and will benefit most from co2 tax?
          Goldman Sachs.

          Who owns goldman sachs?-the Rothschild.

          4)Where did Trotzky started from to bring marxism to russia?
          The other world banking center=New York/Wall Street.
          There were almost no Russians involved in the russian revolition and less than 5% have been russians among the top 400 leaders of the russian revolution.
          This was no russian revolution but a coup.

          5)After Marx prdedictions failed miserably(there will be no war//workers will unite etc)
          the elites created the frankfurt school(Frankfurt is the original home of the rothschild)
          The purpose of frankfurt school was to protect Marx teachings by perversion of logic.
          Blaming workers and christianity for marx failings+ the aim to destroy western civilisation with things like polymorphic perversion.

          In 1950 communist whistleblower bela dodd revealed that communists had infiltrated christian churches with 1100 agenst just in the usa(and pretty sure also south america,looking at pope franciskus)

          Decades later green parties and happies have been created
          to promote adorno(frankfurt) school

        • kentclizbe says:

          Zebo,

          You’re onto a sound course of analysis, but you lost the track at the “Frankfurt School.”

          “The elites created the frankfurt school(Frankfurt is the original home of the rothschild)
          The purpose of frankfurt school was to protect Marx teachings by perversion of logic.”

          The overt manifestations of the operation to destroy Anglo-Saxon culture/economy were many–including the Frankfurt School. However, as with many sources of power, the unseen are more powerful than the obvious.

          The Frankfurt School’s teachings/beliefs were drawn directly from the Comintern genius of influence, Willi Muenzenberg. He designed the message, the strategy and tactics of insertion into American (and European) culture. His approach was subtle, and unseen. Therefore much more powerful.

          The message and effects you ascribe to the Frankfurt School were 100% Muenzenberg, and his vast covert influence operations.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Thanks Zebo and Kent,
          I think it is useful to track back to the beginning especially since it appears to be a con job by the elite. Then perhaps it can be used on those who have been indoctrinated.

          Let’s face it. If there had not been a lot of money behind it socialism and communism would have been a foot note in history.

          This seems to have a lot of info:
          http://www.eurocanadian.ca/2014/06/the-socialist-capitalist-alliance.html

    • gator69 says:

      They know that their plans will do nothing to change the climate, but they also know that their plans will usher in the socialist utopia for which they yearn.

  4. kentclizbe says:

    Yeah, that graph may LOOK like it’s getting cooler–BUT…….have those thermometer readings been homogenized?

    /sarc

  5. willys36 says:

    Truth be told, institutionalized ‘science’ is nothing more than strong-armed political propaganda parading as truth. The only saving grace is the occasional widget that escapes the system that is beneficial to society. The greatest example of this assertion (second to this blog) is the book “The Five Equations that Changed the World”. It is a series of short bios of Isaac Newton, Daniel Bernoulli, Michael Faraday, Rudolf Clausius, and.Albert Einstein and the common thread in all the stories is the fact that the ‘scientific community’ did everything in its power to destroy these men personally, not satisfied with simply discrediting their work.

    • Gail Combs says:

      The mainstream generally has to be dragged kicking and screaming into the future.

    • Ted says:

      And then there’s Tesla. The mud they’ve dragged that poor man’s name through is jaw dropping. I could make a solid argument that he was the single most influential man of the 20th century. Yet the mere mention of his name gets one labeled a kook.

  6. lectrikdog says:

    Bigotry – intolerance toward those who hold different opinions from oneself.
    Just when you thought Climate Stupid couldn’t get any more ugly:
    https://pjmedia.com/trending/2015/12/2/obamas-organizing-for-action-call-out-the-climate-change-deniers

    • Gail Combs says:

      WOW that PJ media post certainly got a lot of comments.

      Looks like Obummer started yet another “Let You and He Fight while I steal the cheese.”

      • DougM says:

        That is all he is good at – divide and conquer. Keep the sheeple in the dark and fed on enough excrement to keep the dissenters (his “enemies”) at bay. And it looks like we are well on our way to getting a new crop of the same in the next four years.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s