NOAA US Temperature Fraud

Future President Ted Cruz recently held a Senate hearing on climate which featured the two graphs below showing the various stages of NOAA’s vandalism of the US temperature record.

2015-12-15-05-09-47

The graph on the left was published by NOAA around 1999, and shows about 0.5F data tampering, which flatlined after 1990. All of the adjustments were upwards at that time.

ts.ushcn_anom25_diffs_urb-raw_pg

ts.ushcn_anom25_diffs_urb-raw_pg.gif (650×502)

I generated the equivalent graph for 2015, which now shows about 1.5F data tampering – three times as much as they did in 1999. All of the pre-2000 adjustments are now downwards (previously were upwards) indicating that these hacks are simply making it up as they go – and not doing any actual science.

2015-12-18-10-02-47

Reported : ushcn.tavg.latest.FLs.52j.tar.gz
Measured : ushcn.tavg.latest.raw.tar.gz

Next graph shows the 1999 and 2015 versions overlain at the same scale, and normalized to 1910-1920. There has been massive additional tampering, and the post-1990 flatline is now a hockey stick.

2015-12-18-11-03-45

Next graph is an updated version of the graph Ted Cruz showed on the right side, showing how NOAA turns an 80 year measured cooling trend, into a hockey stick of warming – by simply altering the data.

2015-12-18-12-36-03

In 1989, NOAA reported no US warming trend over the previous century.

2015-12-18-12-01-35

U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend – NYTimes.com

Now they show about 0.5°F warming during that same period.

2015-12-18-12-18-43

Climate at a Glance | National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI)

The way that they created this hockey stick, is by simply making up data. When they having missing data for a station for a month, they make up fake data using a computer model and mark it with an ‘E’. Almost half of their data is now fake, which makes it possible for them to create any shaped graph they want.

2015-12-18-11-36-52

The graph below shows the measured trends since 1990 vs. the trend of their fake data. As you can see, more than 100% of reported warming is due to fake data from models. Thermometers no longer play any meaningful role in USHCN temperature trends.

2015-12-18-11-32-53

The next graph hints at what their models are doing. It shows the amount of data tampering vs. atmospheric CO2. NOAA is forcing temperatures to rise as CO2 increases, with almost perfect correlation.

2015-12-18-11-52-05

NOAA temperature graphs have nothing to do with what is occurring on this planet, and everything to do with pushing the White House global warming agenda.

About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to NOAA US Temperature Fraud

  1. scott says:

    Throw in the IPCC to this criminal conspiracy too.
    The mandate for the IPCC is to find the MAN MADE CAUSES OF GLOBAL WARMING and doesn’t allow any other explanations to be included in their reports. These would preclude the sun, earths tilt, earths orbit or any other plausible explanation. So of course the only man made identifiable gas is CO2 even though water vapor is a better green house gas but the IPCC thru its mandate is forbidden to study water vapor because its not man made.

    from the IPCC website

    http://ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/index.php?idp=22

    “assess scientific, technical, and socioeconomic information that is relevant in understanding human-induced climate change, its potential impacts, and options for mitigation and adaptation”

    If a detective is only allowed to look for one named suspect and build a case around that suspect. Any findings would and should be derided. This is what the IPCC is doing and should suffer derision as well.

    • Gail Combs says:

      Humans were tried and found guilty BEFORE the IPCC ever looked at a scientific fact. The IPCC mandate is not to figure out what factors effect the climate but to dig up the facts needed to hang the human race. The IPCC assumes the role of prosecution and and the skeptics that of the defense but the judge (aka the media) refuses to allow the defense council into the court room.

      Western Civilization was tried and found guilty BEFORE the IPCC ever looked at a scientific fact. The IPCC mandate is not to figure out what factors effect the climate but to dig up the facts needed to hang the human race. The IPCC assumes the role of prosecution and and the skeptics that of the defense but the judge (aka the media) refuses to allow the defense council into the court room.

      Academia is providing the manufactured evidence to ‘frame’ the human race and they are KNOWINGLY doing so. In other words Academics who prides themselves as being ‘lofty socialists’ untainted by plebeian capitalism are KNOWINGLY selling the rest of the human race into the slavery designed by the bankers and corporate elite. (Agenda 21) The Financiers, CEOs, Academics, and Politicians know exactly what they are doing, and that is the complete gutting of western civilization for profit. The lament “it is for our future children” has to be the vilest lie they have ever told, since their actions sell those same children into slavery.

      The International Financier’s stake in CAGW

      World Bank Carbon Finance Report for 2007
      The carbon economy is the fastest growing industry globally with US$84 billion of carbon trading conducted in 2007, doubling to $116 billion in 2008, and expected to reach over $200 billion by 2012 and over $2,000 billion by 2020

      This is a fraud that produces nothing but poverty. It does not produce a single penny of wealth and instead acts as a short circuit across the advancement and wealth of an entire civilization.

      Worse it is a fraud where our entire world is being reorganized and place under a totalitarian bureaucracy with zero representation or answerability. (The SOBs even have diplomatic immunity to the law AND pay no tax! Can you say The New Aristocracy?)

      …………….
      “Can we balance the need for a sustainable planet with the need to provide billions with decent living standards? Can we do that without questioning radically the Western way of life? These may be complex questions, but they demand answers…..The reality is that, so far, we have largely failed to articulate a clear and compelling vision of why a new global order matters — and where the world should be headed… All had lived through the chaos of the 1930s…. All, including the defeated powers, agreed that the road to peace lay with building a new international order — and an approach to international relations that questioned the Westphalian, sacrosanct principle of sovereignty… ” ~ Pascal Lamy Director-General of the World Trade Organization

      “We need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination…
      So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements and make little mention of any doubts… Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest.”
      ~ Prof. Stephen Schneider, Stanford Professor of Climatology, lead author of many IPCC reports

      “The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.” ~ Prof. Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research

      “The models are convenient fictions that provide something very useful.” ~ Dr David Frame, climate modeler, Oxford University

      “The only way to get our society to truly change is to frighten people with the possibility of a catastrophe.” ~ Daniel Botkin emeritus professor Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara.
      ……….

      Mann, Jones et al, in a nutshell. From Judith Curry:
      http://judithcurry.com/2013/08/20/scientists-and-motivated-reasoning/

      Once the UNFCCC treaty was a done deal, the IPCC and its scientific conclusions were set on a track to become a self fulfilling prophecy. The entire framing of the IPCC was designed around identifying sufficient evidence so that the human-induced greenhouse warming could be declared unequivocal, and so providing the rationale for developing the political will to implement and enforce carbon stabilization targets. National and international science programs were funded to support the IPCC objectives.

      Were these just hardworking scientists doing their best to address the impossible expectations of the policy makers? Well, many of them were. However, at the heart of the IPCC is a cadre of scientists whose careers have been made by the IPCC. These scientists have used the IPCC to jump the normal meritocracy process by which scientists achieve influence over the politics of science and policy. Not only has this brought some relatively unknown, inexperienced and possibly dubious people into positions of influence, but these people become vested in protecting the IPCC, which has become central to their own career and legitimizes playing power politics with their expertise.

      …I believe advocacy by climate scientists has damaged trust in the science. We risk our credibility, our reputation for objectivity, if we are not absolutely neutral. At the very least, it leaves us open to criticism….

      http://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2013/jul/31/climate-scientists-policies

      Love this from the comment section. It says it all.

      SteelyGlint says:
      “What’s the difference between a policy wonk who’s up to date with the science and someone employed as a scientist who is informed about the policy questions? Indeed, one might expect a possible career path to include a transition from scientific practitioner to policy adviser.”

      dave204 answers:
      As someone who worked for years in ‘policy’ and ‘advice’ I think that’s one of the funnier things I ever read. The qualities that take you forward as ‘policy adviser’ are not the qualities that help you to succeed in science. To put it bluntly, people who do well in policy advice are by and large people who are willing to make the figures/facts say whatever the politician/career loon wants to hear. Hope that helps.
      http://discussion.theguardian.com/comment-permalink/25632079

      That answer is certainly a keeper!

    • lorne50 says:

      Please don’t use the words that give them conspiracy 😞

    • Bartleby says:

      The assertion “the IPCC thru its mandate is forbidden to study water vapor because its not man made.” is, in the context of modern civilization, incorrect.

      I suggest looking at the number of square miles of desert placed under irrigation over the past 100 years, essentially since the great depression and the subsequent public works projects that created dams such as the Grand Coulee and irrigation districts such as the Columbia Basin Project.

      These were essentially terraforming projects and they resulted in creating water where it hadn’t existed before, water that contributed to increased vapor in the atmosphere.

      If a person can argue CO2 is a greenhouse gas produced by humans, certainly very large scale irrigation projects can be said to have increased atmospheric H2O artificially also.

  2. Tony, I certainly hope that you’ve already sent this to Ted Cruz.

  3. gator69 says:

    One of your best Tony! Thanks.

  4. Andy DC says:

    President Cruz would be a nightmare for climate scientists and useless bureaucrats in general.

  5. Climatism says:

    Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
    Tony,
    Thanks for another great year of excellent work and in particular getting some serious runs on the board in exposing the NOAA / NASA et al fraud.
    Was chuffed for you and your efforts, watching Ted’s senate hearing ‘dogma over data’ and seeing your graphs used and logged as evidence!!
    Your tireless work makes such a difference and keeps a lot of people sane, confident and happy for our future, amongst so much insanity that abounds!

    Wishing you and fam a safe and happy Xmas and a brilliant new year!

    As a thank you and Chrissy gift, would like to send you and your wife a gift from a new biz I’ve been developing this year. Product is finally back and would love to send some stuff your way.
    Will be perfect for your next trip down to Cancun or any of those places where sea level rise “threatens” !

    Send Postal or PO BOX details to my email if you would like …

    fiveovintage@icloud.com

    Cheers,

    Jamie.

  6. scott says:

    where can I find the raw data for the for the USHCN temperature that have the estimate value.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s