Southern Hemisphere Temperature Fraud

Government climate fraudsters claim that they know Southern Hemisphere temperatures back to 1880, and that they basically match northern hemisphere temperatures.


What Gavin forgot to mention is that the southern hemisphere graph is fake. In 1978, scientists agreed data south of 30S was too meager to be reliable.

PaintImage83ScreenHunter_10659 Oct. 04 06.22

TimesMachine: January 5, 1978 –

The 1990 IPCC report showed that there was insufficient temperature data for analysis in much of the Arctic, most of the southern oceans, and all of the Antarctic.


In Climategate E-Mails, Phil Jones admitted that much of his southern hemisphere ocean temperatures were made up, because there is no actual data.



(h/t Gail Combs)

In 1997, NASA showed that three fourths of southern hemisphere land warming occurred before 1940.


Now let’s look at what the criminals at NASA have done since 1997. They now show almost no southern hemisphere warming before 1940, and 80% of warming occurring after 1940.


Fig.A3.gif (625×474)

They accomplished this fraud largely by throwing in lots of non-existent ocean temperature data.


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

13 Responses to Southern Hemisphere Temperature Fraud

  1. gator69 says:

    “Climate Science” is becoming a fact-free zone, and this is quite possibly as dangerous as a gun-free zone.

  2. Geoff Gubb says:

    Pointing out the fraud will only play to those in our church. There is a way to do it [think Mike Sanicola] and it’s almost childishly easy. I’m about 3 (+/-) hrs. S. of you and “Have CO2-meter, Can Travel.”

  3. rah says:

    SG says: “What Gavin forgot to mention is that the southern hemisphere graph is fake.”
    Why would anyone think that he would so anything less since much of his northern hemisphere thermometer “data” is fake also?

  4. Ted says:

    But do you have any peer reviewed studies PROVING that the non-existent data doesn’t exist?

    • Mark Luhman says:

      Don’t you mean does Galvin have any pal review studies with the data in it. Galvin is making the claims that the world is warming the gathering and providing the data is on him. At least that the way science use to work!

      • Ted says:

        Sorry, inside joke. That’s a reference to the interminable demands of one of our resident imbeciles on this site.

      • Gail Combs says:

        I just answered one of his loopy logic points:

        CFool says: “No proof of a fraud has been presented. Smoke and mirrors it seems.”

        Yeah, right try that on the IRS! Civil Asset Confiscation: The US Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Can Now Seize Bank Accounts On Suspicion Alone

        “How can this happen?” Ms. Hinders said in a recent interview. “Who takes your money before they prove that you’ve done anything wrong with it?”

        The federal government does.

        * * *

        The topic of civil asset forfeiture has been high on our agenda recently as federal ‘agents’ discover how to steal Americans’ hard-earned cash with zero repurcussions , and decide unilaterally how much cash a ‘common man’ is allowed to carry; but as The NY Times reports, the escalation to The IRS brings a whole new world of possibilities with regard asset confiscation based on no actual crime being proved…

        The Internal Revenue Service agents did not accuse Ms. Hinders of money laundering or cheating on her taxes — in fact, she has not been charged with any crime. Instead, the money was seized solely because she had deposited less than $10,000 at a time, which they viewed as an attempt to avoid triggering a required government report.

        Her money was seized under an increasingly controversial area of law known as civil asset forfeiture, which allows law enforcement agents to take property they suspect of being tied to crime even if no criminal charges are filed. Law enforcement agencies get to keep a share of whatever is forfeited….

        Critics say this incentive has led to the creation of a law enforcement dragnet, with more than 100 multiagency task forces combing through bank reports, looking for bank accounts to seize.
        … the Institute for Justice, a Washington-based public interest law firm that is seeking to reform civil forfeiture practices, analyzed structuring data from the I.R.S., which made 639 seizures in 2012, up from 114 in 2005. Only one in five was prosecuted as a criminal structuring case.

        The practice has swept up dairy farmers in Maryland, an Army sergeant in Virginia saving for his children’s college education and Ms. Hinders, 67, who has borrowed money, strained her credit cards and taken out a second mortgage to keep her restaurant going.

        Under the Bank Secrecy Act, banks and other financial institutions must report cash deposits greater than $10,000. But since many criminals are aware of that requirement, banks also are supposed to report any suspicious transactions, including deposit patterns below $10,000. Last year, banks filed more than 700,000 suspicious activity reports….

        As one lawyer defending against the IRS’ aggressive ‘stealing’ tactics concludes…

        “I don’t think they’re really interested in anything,” Mr. Potashnik said of the prosecutors. “They just want the money.”

        GOTTA pay all those bribes salaries to the ClimAstrologists some how I guess.

        • Jason Calley says:

          The supposed “justification” for the seizures is that the money itself is charged with a crime. No, I am not joking. There will be a case filed with a name like “United States vs $21,548 dollars in cash” or perhaps, “State of Maryland vs House at 2757 Elm Street, Springfield, Maryland”. Because an inanimate object has been charged with a crime, it has no Constitutional rights. There is no “innocent until proven guilty.” No, I am not making this up. That is how it works. It truly is theft under color of law.

          Can anyone doubt that the equal rule of law no longer applies in the United States? The fat lady has finished her aria and left the stage. The only people who don’t know it are the ones in the audience who are still asleep.

        • DD More says:

          Gail, see also Constructive Fraud

          Under contract law, a defendant can be liable to a plaintiff for constructive fraud if there was: (1) a false misrepresentation; (2) in reference to a material fact; (3) for the purpose of inducing the other party to rely on such representation; 4) on which the other party did justifiably rely; (5) which resulted in damages or injury; and (6) a fiduciary relationship between the parties. Hagarty v. Ithaca City School District, 423 N.Y.S. 2d 843 (1979).

          Bad intent or dishonesty is not a requirement to satisfy constructive fraud.

          The elements for actual and constructive fraud are the same with two exceptions: constructive fraud drops the element of scienter–knowledge on the part of the injurer of the representation’s falsity–and adds the element of a fiduciary relationship.

          It is a false misrepresentation, a material fact (no warming without it), its purpose it to get people to rely on it, some are justifiably relying, our power bills and study grants are injuring us, they are paid (fiduciary) by taxpayers. We do not need to show intent under Constructive Fraud.

        • Gail Combs says:

          Thanks Jason and DD More

          COLOR OF THE LAW (what is happening in the USA)
          USC Title 18 Part 1 Chapter 13 § 242 – Deprivation of rights under color of law


          Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States. For the purpose of Section 242, acts under “color of law” include acts not only done by federal, state, or local officials within the their lawful authority, but also acts done beyond the bounds of that official’s lawful authority, if the acts are done while the official is purporting to or pretending to act in the performance of his/her official duties. Persons acting under color of law within the meaning of this statute include police officers, prisons guards and other law enforcement officials, as well as judges, care providers in public health facilities, and others who are acting as public officials. It is not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status or national origin of the victim.

          The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury, if any.

          TITLE 18, U.S.C., SECTION 242

          Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnaping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

          Now think of the EPA and their illegal human guinea pig trials at universities.

          Teen dies:

          And our blasted courts side with the murders…

          The corruption is throughout the system at this point. All the way up to the Supreme Court that ruled our rights to a jury trial no longer exist!

          “Anyone accused of a crime in this country is entitled to a jury trial.”

          The Constitution may say so but, in fact, this is simply not the case — and becoming less so as politicians fiddle with legal definitions and sentencing standards in order specifically to reduce the number of persons entitled to a trial….

          In contrast to the near-universal support for the civil jury trial in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, modern jurists consider civil jury trial neither “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty,” Palko v. State of Connecticut (1937), nor “fundamental to the American scheme of justice,” Duncan v. Louisiana (1968).

  5. markstoval says:

    Sometimes a scam, fraud, delusion, whatever is so large and widespread that it is hard for the common man to believe it is going on. “How could that many people be in on it and it still be secret?”

    The surface temperature records are a massive fraud of unbelievable proportions. This site documents this fact nearly daily, but the average man “on the street” in the US would never believe what is revealed here. There are no “scientists” working at NOAA or NASS, only propagandists paid to defraud the public.

    The surface temperature record just makes up data for large parts of the earth’s surface (how many thermometers in South America for example) and when they have temperature reading they change these reading by “adjustment” and then call the “adjustments” as data. Unbelievable!

    There must be some sort (say 1,500 words or less) way to show the massive nature of the fraud. Must be.

  6. Steve Case says:

    markstoval says:
    December 21, 2015 at 11:03 am

    The surface temperature record just makes up data for large parts of the earth’s surface (how many thermometers in South America for example) and when they have temperature reading they change these reading by “adjustment” and then call the “adjustments” as data….

    They change data from 100 or more years ago every month.

  7. Robert B says:

    You might be interested in this

    Like the old average temperatures of Australia, Chile showed cooling in the first half of the 20th C and then warming in the second half.

    Amazingly, the SH follows the NH closely in the first half of the 20th C in GISS and HadCRUT (up until the satellite ere).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s