The Guardian drowned Tokyo in 1936
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
- Toto Has Moved!
- Cooling Nuuk
- Escape The Heat At Your Local Movie Theater
- Charles Butler Interview – May 2, 2016
- Massive Greenland Fraud Is Rapidly Growing
- More Detail On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- 1995 IPCC Report Showed No Troposphere Warming From 1958 To 1995
- More On The NSIDC Disappearing Ice
- Climate Hustle Today
- On The Air Monday
- NOAA Quadrupling Radiosonde Temperatures By Data Tampering
- Skiing Is A Thing Of The Past
- Alarmist Brains Depleted Of Oxygen
- Climate Scam Being Driven By Politicians/Actors/Journalists
- 1905 : Valdez, Alaska Relocated Due To Glacial Melting
- Today’s Climate Fraud Winners – Science News
- Most Influential Climate Denier On Twitter
- SCIENCE : 230 Years Of Blaming White Men For Climate Change
- Battling Climate Misinformation In Santa Fe
- 1906 : Belief In Climate Change Is Due To Defective Memories
- Oswald’s Rifle?
- The Arctic Is Ice Free – How Can Sea Ice Be Declining?
- Climate Hustle Next Monday – One Night Only
- The Surface Temperature Record Is A Farce
- NASA – Doubling Sea Level Rise By Data Tampering
-
Join 1,965 other subscribers
Recent Comments
D-Link doesn’t let me read this message.
Just for clarity, this is not the Guardian to which we usually refer, correct?
Same one
In 1936 it was known as “The Manchester Guardian”.
Boulder?
So Climate Change in the 30’s resulted in the attack on Pearl Harbor!
Wenzhuan Tibet Maybe?
Altitude 16,730 feet above sea level.
The Guardian hasn’t drowned my home town, yet. I feel left out.
I keep hearing the news refer to “record flooding” along the Mississippi from St. Louis down through Missouri. Though I have not checked I suspect that the records being set are local and not general because I remember at least a couple times before when there was worse flooding in the same areas. The great flood of 1993 was much more extensive.
The one in 1972? wasn’t anything to sneeze at either.