Scientists Used To Actually Do Science

In 1903, scientists observed that glaciers were receding all over the world, and recognized that it was due to cosmic climatic changes.


7 Dec 1903, Page 5 – at

Now scientists simply lie, make up utterly nonsensical fake data, and parrot brainless theories.



About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Scientists Used To Actually Do Science

  1. Dave G says:

    Real science requires getting off your duff and looking at things… Playing around with computer models is much for fun… I mean you can control the outcome and stuff.

  2. Robertv says:

    GISS Surface Temperature Analysis

    Station Data: Harare (Kutsa (17.9 S,31.1 E)

    Maybe GISS forgot to update this station.

  3. ralfellis says:

    And they don’t like it when people have contrarian ideas. You must conform…….

    Clive Best has a really good summary of the “dust-ice-albedo” theory for ice age modulation – and therefore for global temperature control. It is not an idea that the establishment likes to talk about too much, but it is logical and likely….


  4. gator69 says:

    Everything has its price.

  5. lorne50 says:

    Martin hum guess you be the clod from climate deniers blog do believe I called you SS cook O:-)

  6. omanuel says:

    The basic principles of science are as sacred to real scientists as Catholicism is to the Pope.

    But we almost all failed to seriously consider the warning in George Orwell’s two books

    1. “Animal Farm” on the rise of Comminism before WWII, and
    2. “Nineteen Eighty-Four” on the rise of a new form of Communism based on

    Falsehoods disguised as unanimous, consensus scientific conclusions.

    On pages 153-154 of his 1994 autobiography, “Home Is Where The Wind Blows”, Sir Fred Hoyle explains the rise of unanimous, consensus science immediately after WWII:

    Fred Hoyle and everyone he knew in the field of astronomy and astrophysics agreed that the interior of the Sun was:

    1. Mostly iron (Fe) in 1945, but
    2. Mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946

    and the change in opinions was unanimous, with no discussion or debate.

    Most real scientists could not believe our government capable of purposefully deceiving the public after WWII, until Climategate emails finally forced us to consider that fact in 2009.

    The future seems bleak today, but I am absolutely certain that ancient scriptures will be confirmed:“Truth is victorious, never untruth.”

    • Martin Smith says:

      “Falsehoods disguised as unanimous, consensus scientific conclusions.”

      If your argument is that the consensus is always wrong, it’s a pretty silly argument.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s