Cause Of El Nino Found!

It turns out that NASA data tampering is the cause of El Nino.

Screenshot 2016-01-23 at 12.29.10 AM

Nasa say El Niño should start to disappear but global warming could change that 


About stevengoddard

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

16 Responses to Cause Of El Nino Found!

  1. NASA? What does El Nino have to do with Muslim Outreach?

  2. RAH says:

    Of course as we have seen, nothing can falsify their hypothesis. But they have continually put great stock in claiming that temperatures will rise and not go back down much after this El Nino ends. Starting years before the El Nino Modoki which preceded this El Nino Joe Bastardi was saying that this would be the test of the AGW hypothesis. If we have a significant La Nina and temperatures do not stay at a higher level then as far as he’s concerned the alarmists have no case.

    It is typical, now that this El Nino has apparently peaked and the time begins to approach when their previous claims about what would happen comes closer,they start equivocating. Where before a lot of them were saying that temperatures would remain at a higher level after this El Nino and there would be, we are seeing them now say “anything could happen”.

    • Snowleopard says:

      When they say “anything can happen” it’s a win win for them. Anything that does happen can now be blamed on “climate change”.

      Never mentioned is actual climate change: The incremental drop in insolation that is slowly returning earth’s climate back toward its more stable cold phase. Eventually (without a possible catastrophic acceleration) a mid millennial “little ice age” becomes a full glacial when the solar peak at the end of a millennium is insufficient to melt the ice.

  3. AndyG55 says:

    Seems “climate change started snowfall changes in Antarctica around 1900 !!

    • Gail Combs says:

      …The researchers contend that the dramatic increase in snowfall is a reflection of climate change driven by human activity, deepening the Amundsen Sea Low and driving the melting of the Antarctic ice sheets as early as the 1920s. Since thinning glaciers along the Amundsen coast are one of the biggest Antarctic contributions to sea level rise….
      Citation: Strelich, L. (2016), Climate change drives increasing snowfall in western Antarctica, Eos, 97, doi:10.1029/2016EO044021. Published on 21 January 2016

      This is science? Are they nuts? [T]he dramatic increase in snowfall means a glacier is GROWING unless there is something else happening… LIKE GEOTHERMAL HEAT AND VOLCANOES melting the glacier from underneath and putting it on a fast track into the sea. (2014)

      And yes I pointed that study out in the comments.

      • Gail Combs says:

        Gail Combs • 2 hours ago

        Hold on, this is waiting to be approved by Eos.

        More snow means glaciers grow. So why is the glacier thinning?

        Research from two years ago says from geothermal sources. Water under the glacier will also make it slide faster into the sea accelerating thinning.

        This is an example of very poor science. I should not have to point out a study from a couple years ago that show your ‘contention’ is baseless.

        It will be interesting to see if Eos approves this or censors it.

        So far it has not been approved.

  4. Jason Calley says:

    LOL! NASA says “global warming means ‘anything could happen'”. That is the first accurate thing I have heard NASA say about “global warming”. There is a reason why I almost always refer to it as CAGW, “catastrophic anthropogenic global warming”. Why because none of the alarmist can agree on what global warming is; it might make us cold, it might make us hot, it might make us dry, it might make us wet, it might make it stormy or on the other hand the annual monsoons might stop… The ONLY things they agree on is that we humans have caused it and it is going to be CATASTROPHIC!

    It is embarrassing to see grown ups embrace such nebulous quackery as CAGW.

      • Jason Calley says:

        Many of the same people who think that carbon offsets are a good idea will tell you that the Catholic Church was a chump scam during the Middle Ages because they sold absolution from sins.

        • kmbold says:

          I see a similarity in what you MEANT to say but just for the record may I clear up one thing? Whatever simony took place at any time in the past regarding the SELLING OF INDULGENCES had NOTHING to do with absolution from sins. NEVER has there been a charge for abolution. ABSOLUTELY. What went on, and it was deplorable, was the SELLING OF INDULGENCES, an indulgence being the TEMPORAL REMISSION OF PUNISHMENT DUE TO SINS. When we sin we have hurt ourselves and/or others as well as offended the infinite goodness of God. Pretend for a moment that you committed a sin: you deliberately lied about global warming and collected carbon offset fees. You realized it was a scam, confessed the sin, were forgiven, but there is still harm done that has to be dealt with. (Agreed?) An indulgence helps with that. Prayers, penance, pilgrimages, almsgiving, etc. are sources for indulgences. No money changes hands, except for the alms, at least shouldn’t have. The penitent just did the good deeds. Some corrupt clerics (and probably politicians) decided to get in on this gravy train and charged money for these indulgences. This came to an end some time ago. Indulgences are still possible to attain, such as during this Year of Mercy, but only by doing specified actions. No charge.
          Please note this and do not intentionally mistake the words “indulgence” and “absolution” again. If you need a lesson on the difference between the Immaculate Conception and the Virgin Birth give me a ring. 😉

        • Jason Calley says:

          Hey kmbold! One of the things that I like about this site is that I often get to read things by people who know more than I do. Thanks! You make some very good points and what you say is a real help in clarifying the subject. I will try to be more accurate in the future. Thanks for taking the time to help me out about this!

  5. smamarver says:

    Though some seem to have answers for every question/fact happening in our world, others keep asking questions and making research. Maybe a comparison between two different winters with strong El Nino events will help us understand some issues:

  6. Dave N says:

    Alarmist BS means that “any kind of stupid explanation could happen”, despite what happens after the El Niño

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s